Operative Dentistry Flashcards
f
Describe retention form.
Ability of restoration to RESIST forces along the long axis of the tooth.
Describe resistance form.
Prevents dislodgement of restoration under occlusal forces in apical or oblique direction.
In the study, “Achievable Convergence Angle and the Effect of Preparation Design on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs” JVD 2011.2 what was the overall mean CA?
26.7 degrees
In the study “Achievable Convergence Angle and the Effect of Preparation Design on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs,” JVD 2011.2, what were the main takeaways?
An ideal CA of 12 degrees is almost never attained. But the more clinical crown (high H/D) the less concerned we need to be about achieving a low CA.
In the study “Achievable Convergence Angle and the Effect of Preparation Design on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs,” JVD 2011.2, the CA_lim can be used as a guide for determining the necessary CA for retention and resistance. What is the formula?
CA_lim = arcsin (H/D)
In the study, “Effect of Preparation Surface Area on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs” JVD 2014.1 what was the success rate?
84.4 % or 27/32 crowns
In the study, “Effect of Preparation Surface Area on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs” JVD 2014.1, how many crown failures were due to fractures vs cohesive/adhesive failures?
Fractures - 2/5 (40%)
Cohesive/adhesive failures - 3/5 (60%)
In the study, “Effect of Preparation Surface Area on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs” JVD 2014.1, what was the mean surface area for successful crowns, crown failure due to adhesive/cohesive failure and crowns that failed due to fracture?
1.9 cm2 - success
1.23 cm2 - failed due to adhesion
1.73 cm2 - failed due to fracture
In the study, “Effect of Preparation Surface Area on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs” JVD 2014.1, what was the importance of the axial grooves?
They decrease the CA, and therefor increase resistance and retention. They also increase SA.
In the study, “Effect of Preparation Surface Area on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs” JVD 2014.1, what was the main take away of the study?
There is a positive correlation between preparations with greater surface area and successful clinical outcome, but this was not found to be statistically significant.
What is the definition of convergence angle?
Soukup, Synder. Achievable Convergence Angle and the Effect of Preparation Design on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs. JVD 2011.
angle between two opposing axial walls, equals the sum of the taper of two opposing axial walls
Ideal convergence angle 3-14 degrees, not clinically achievable
What is the defintion of and formula for limiting average taper?
Soukup, Synder. Achievable Convergence Angle and the Effect of Preparation Design on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs. JVD 2011.
The point at which resistance form is lost
CAlim = arcsin (H/D)
If H/D > 1 then there is no CAlim –> adequate resistance/retention
In Soukup’s 2011 article “Achievable Convergence Angle and the Effect of Preparation Design on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs,” restorations that failed from adhesive/cohesive failure vs teeth that fractured had higher or lower H/D ratios significantly?
JVD 2011
Restorations that failed from adhesive failure had a lower H/D ratio (not stat sig)
Restorations that failed from tooth fracture had higher H/D ratio (not stat sig)
In the study, “The Influence of Crown Height to Diameter Ratio on the Force to Fracture of Canine Teeth in Dogs” JVD 2015.3, when the H/D is decreased by 10% and 20% what is their probability of fracture decreased by?
10% decrease in H/D - 24.1%
20% decrease in H/D - 60.4%
What has been shown to be the amount of force required to displace a crown with a convergence angle of 22? What force in N do dogs generate when chewing and when military dogs are biting/pulling with their canine teeth?
Soukup. Crown Preparation Design: An Evidence-Based Review. JVD 2013
Crown displacement force: 1386N
Chewing: 20-937N
Biting/pulling: 180-1120N
Dogs generate forces lower than forces required to displace crown
In the study, “The Influence of Crown Height to Diameter Ratio on the Force to Fracture of Canine Teeth in Dogs” JVD 2015.3, across 2 canine teeth, decreasing H/D by 20% decreases the probability of fracture by?
86.5%
In the study, “The Influence of Crown Height to Diameter Ratio on the Force to Fracture of Canine Teeth in Dogs” JVD 2015.3, decreasing H/D by 20% increases the probability of fracture of the contralateral canine by?
54.4%
What effect have internal grooves been shown to have on effective CA?
Soukup. Crown Preparation Design: An Evidence-Based Review. JVD 2013
Internal grooves decrease the “effective” CA to improve resistance/retention form
In the study, “The Influence of Crown Height to Diameter Ratio on the Force to Fracture of Canine Teeth in Dogs” JVD 2015.3, the mean force to fracture an unaltered canine is?
494 Newtons
What was the main take away in the study, “The Influence of Crown Height to Diameter Ratio on the Force to Fracture of Canine Teeth in Dogs” JVD 2015.3?
There was a significant inverse relationship between H/D and force to fracture.
The amount of force required to dislodge a crown cemented onto a die with CA of 24 degrees and height of 4mm increased how many times when a resin-based cement was used instead of zinc phosphate?
Soukup. Crown Preparation Design: An Evidence-Based Review. JVD 2013
3.5 times
According to Soukup’s 2011 article “Achievable Convergence Angle and the Effect of Preparation Design on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs,” resin-based cements allowed successful use of up to what convergence angle?
JVD 2011
70 degrees
What level of evidence suggest that CAs of 25-30 degrees may be clinically acceptable in dogs?
Soukup. Crown Preparation Design: An Evidence-Based Review. JVD 2013
Grade III
Only Grade IV evidence for use of CA 5-12 degrees
According to Soukup’s 2011 article “Achievable Convergence Angle and the Effect of Preparation Design on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs,” H/D ratios of less or greater to what values are associated with adhesive/cohesive failure vs failure due to fracture respectively?
JVD 2011
H/D ratios < 1.6 may be more likely to fail due to adhesive/cohesive failure
H/D ratios > 1.8 may be more likely to fail due to fracture
There is what grade of evidence to refute the recommendation that minimum 3-8mm (or 1/3 clinical crown) must exist to support full metal crown?
Soukup. Crown Preparation Design: An Evidence-Based Review. JVD 2013
Grade III evidence that crown heights of less than 1/3rd the original height may lead to higher rates of crown failure of canine teeth in dogs
Grade III evidence that preparations with H/D ratios < 1.6 may have higher failure rates
In the study, “Assessment of 68 Prosthodontic Crowns in 41 Pet and Working Dogs (2000-2012)” by Reiter 2015.3,of the 10 crowns that failed how many were due to bond failure vs fractures?
Bond failure - 3
Fracture failure - 7
In the study, “Assessment of 68 Prosthodontic Crowns in 41 Pet and Working Dogs (2000-2012)” by Reiter 2015.3, what is the mean canine bite force?
256 N
In Soukup’s 2013 article “Soukup. Crown Preparation Design: An Evidence-Based Review,” what was the only recommendation that was supported based off of current evidence?
JVD 2013
Recommendation #4: the crown margin should be placed supragingivally
What is the following a picture of?
Shear force vectors during mastication
In the study,” Evaluation of the natural crown convergence angle of dog carnassial teeth” by Soukop 2015.4 what was the mean CA for 108?
42.89 degrees
In the study,” Evaluation of the natural crown convergence angle of dog carnassial teeth” by Soukop 2015.4 what was the mean CA for 409?
36 degrees
What was the main take away in the study, “The Influence of Axial Grooves on
Dislodgment Resistance of Prosthetic Metal
Crowns in Canine Teeth of Dogs” by Soukop 2016.3?
Crown retention is improved in canine teeth when axial grooves are made by increasing the force to dislodge a crown by 6 times!
What was the main take away in the study, “The Influence of Axial Grooves on
Dislodgment Resistance of Prosthetic Metal
Crowns in Maxillary Fourth Premolar Teeth of Dogs” by Soukop 2016.3?
Crown retention is improved in maxillary fourth premolar teeth when axial grooves are made by increasing the force to dislodge a crown by 1.5 times!
In Reihl’s 2014 study “Effect of Preparation Surface Area on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs,” what was the failure rate and what percent of failures were due to fractured teeth vs adhesive/cohesive failure?
Soukup JVD 2014
Failure rate: 15.6% (5/32)
Fractured teeth: 40% (2/5)
Adhesive/cohesive failure: 60% (3/5)
In Reihl’s 2014 study “Effect of Preparation Surface Area on the Clinical Outcome of Full Veneer Crowns in Dogs,” what was the mean surface area and what was the association of surface area with likelihood of clinical success?
Soukup. JVD 2014
Mean SA 1.78 cm^2
No significant association between preparation SA and likelihood of clinical success
Positive trend of higher mean SA with success
Feathered edge crown preparation margins have a bevel of what angle or greater?
Fink, Reiter. Assessment of 68 Prosthodontic Crowns in 41 Pet and Working Dogs (2000–2012). JVD 2015
70 degrees or greater
Are water based, oil based or resin based luting cements stronger?
Fink, Reiter. Assessment of 68 Prosthodontic Crowns in 41 Pet and Working Dogs (2000–2012). JVD 2015
Resin based cements
Water based: glass ionomer
Oil based: zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE)
In human studies, teeth without crowns are lost how many times faster than teeth with crowns?
Fink, Reiter. Assessment of 68 Prosthodontic Crowns in 41 Pet and Working Dogs (2000–2012). JVD 2015
6 times faster
In Fink’s 2015 study “Assessment of 68 Prosthodontic Crowns in 41 Pet and Working Dogs (2000–2012),” what percent of dogs were working dogs vs pet dogs, and what percent of cases had full crowns vs partial crowns?
Reiter. JVD 2015
Working dogs 70%
Pet dogs 30%
Full crowns 82%
Partial crowns 18%
In Fink’s 2015 study “Assessment of 68 Prosthodontic Crowns in 41 Pet and Working Dogs (2000–2012),” treatment was considered successful in what percent of cases and what percent of overall cases failed due to bond failure or fracture respectively?
Reiter. JVD 2015
Success rate 85.3%
Bond failure 4.4% cases
Fractured 10.3% cases
Success rate lower than previous study that just evaluated mandibular canine teeth: 87.8%
In Fink’s 2015 study “Assessment of 68 Prosthodontic Crowns in 41 Pet and Working Dogs (2000–2012),” what was the mean days that the crowns remained in place?
Reiter, JVD 2015.
1,598 (~1,600) days
In Zimmerman’s 2015 article “Evaluation of the Natural Crown Convergence Angle of Dog Carnassial Teeth,” what were the overall CA of 108 and 409 respectively?
Soukup JVD 2015
108: 43 degrees
409: 36 degrees
In Zimmerman’s 2015 article “Evaluation of the Natural Crown Convergence Angle of Dog Carnassial Teeth,” what was the association between natural CA and weight, age or skull type for 108 and 409?
Soukup JVD 2015
No sig associations between CA with weight, age or skull type for 108 or 409
Patients assigned to 1 of 3 groups: <10 kg, 11-20 kg & >20 kg
In Collins’ 2015 study “Quantitative comparison of mathematical models to measure surface area of canine teeth prepared to receive full veneer crowns in dogs,” what was the association of estimated surface area with actual surface area?
Soukup Frontiers 2015
Estimate surface area showed a significant linear association with actual surface area
All methods of eSA had sig linear association with aSA
In Collins’ 2015 study “Quantitative comparison of mathematical models to measure surface area of canine teeth prepared to receive full veneer crowns in dogs,” which mathematetical models showed the best association?
Soukup Frontiers 2015
H3: right elliptical frustum
E1: right circular cone
In Collins’ 2015 study “Quantitative comparison of mathematical models to measure surface area of canine teeth prepared to receive full veneer crowns in dogs,” what models were proposed to be best for research and clinical settings respectively?
Soukup Frontiers 2015
- Right elliptical frustum (H3): most accurate estimate of crown SA, better for research as it requires laser scanner and CAD program
- Right circular cone (E1): better for clinical setting, only need major base diameter and crown height to calculate
The canine shape can be described as what?
Collins, Hetzel, Soukup. Quantitative comparison of mathematical models to measure surface area of canine teeth prepared to receive full veneer crowns in dogs. Frontiers 2015
Eccentric elliptical cone with dynamic curvature of distal surface
In Soukup’s 2015 paper “The Influence of Crown Height to Diameter Ratio on the Force to Fracture of Canine Teeth in Dogs,” what was the relationship between H/D ratio and force to fracture?
JVD 2015
Linear regression model showed a significant inverse relationship between H/D and force to fx
For every 0.1 unit > in H/D, the force to fx < by 30N
As H/D increases, force to fracture decreases
In Soukup’s 2015 paper “The Influence of Crown Height to Diameter Ratio on the Force to Fracture of Canine Teeth in Dogs,” when 100% of the load was applied to a single unaltered canine tooth (Group A) what was the probabilty of fracture?
JVD 2015
Group A: 37% probability of fracture
In Soukup’s 2015 paper “The Influence of Crown Height to Diameter Ratio on the Force to Fracture of Canine Teeth in Dogs,” when the H/D ratio was decreased by 10% and 20% the probability of fracture was decreased by what percent respectively?
JVD 2015
- 10% decrease in H/D → decreased probability of fracture by 24%
- 20% decrease in H/D → decreased probability of fracture by 60%
In Soukup’s 2015 paper “The Influence of Crown Height to Diameter Ratio on the Force to Fracture of Canine Teeth in Dogs,” when loads were distributed across 2 maxillary canine teeth, a 20% decrease in H/D ratio decreased the probability of fracture of that tooth by what percent and had what effect on the unaltered contralateral canine tooth?
JVD 2015
20% decrease in H/D decreased probability of fx of that tooth by 86% but increased the probability of fx of the unaltered contralateral canine tooth by 54%
In Goldschmidt’s 2016 study “The Influence of Axial Grooves on Dislodgment Resistance of Prosthetic Metal Crowns in Maxillary Fourth Premolar Teeth of Dogs,” what were the unfavorable retention features and what were CA and H/D?
Soukup. JVD 2016
Low H/D ratio: 4/10
High CA: 35 degrees
In Goldschmidt’s 2016 study “The Influence of Axial Grooves on Dislodgment Resistance of Prosthetic Metal Crowns in Canine Teeth of Dogs,” what was the mean force for dislodgement with teeth with no grooves vs teeth with grooves?
Soukup, JVD 2016
Mean force for no grooves: 156N
Mean force for grooves: 901N → stat sig 6 fold increase in force needed for dislodgement with grooves
In Goldschmidt’s 2016 study “The Influence of Axial Grooves on Dislodgment Resistance of Prosthetic Metal Crowns in Maxillary Fourth Premolar Teeth of Dogs,” what was the maximum displacement force for teeth with and without grooves?
Soukup, JVD 2016
No grooves: 1618N
Grooves: 2473N
What was the main conclusion in Goldschmidt’s 2016 study “The Influence of Axial Grooves on Dislodgment Resistance of Prosthetic Metal Crowns in Maxillary Fourth Premolar Teeth of Dogs?”
Soukup JVD 2016
Crown retention is improved in maxillary fourth premolar teeth with otherwise poor retention features when axial grooves are made in the mesial and distal walls during crown preparation
In Goldschmidt’s 2016 study “The Influence of Axial Grooves on Dislodgment Resistance of Prosthetic Metal Crowns in Maxillary Fourth Premolar Teeth of Dogs,” what was the mean force for dislodgement for teeth with no grooves vs teeth with grooves?
Soukup JVD 2016
Mean force for no grooves: 1618N
Mean force for grooves: 2473N (SIG)
Stat sig increase in force required for crown dislodgement in teeth prepared with axial grooves
Soukup and Goldschmidt recommend placement of axial grooves on what surfaces for canine and maxillary fourth premolar teeth respectively?
Canine teeth: labial and palatal grooves
Maxillary PM4 teeth: mesial and distal grooves
Soukup and Goldschmidt found that canine or maxillary PM4 teeth have the greatest change in force required to dislodge a crown when axial grooves are applied?
Canine teeth
What is the mean bite force and maximum bite force of canine teeth and maxillary fourth premolar teeth respectively?
Goldschmidt, Soukup. The Influence of Axial Grooves on Dislodgment Resistance of Prosthetic Metal Crowns in Maxillary Fourth Premolar Teeth of Dogs. JVD 2016.
Canine teeth: mean 534N, max 926N
Maxillary PM4 teeth: mean 1890N, max 3417N
Caudal bite force 2.4x greater than canine
In Goldschmidt’s 2017 paper “The Influence of Force Direction on the Fracture Pattern and Fracture Resistance of Canine Teeth in Dogs, what were the statistically significant findings?
JVD 2017
The influence of force direction on fracture pattern was significant
Each group had a significantly individual fracture profile
In Goldschmidt’s 2017 paper “The Influence of Force Direction on the Fracture Pattern and Fracture Resistance of Canine Teeth in Dogs, what findings were not stastically significant?
JVD 2017
No sig difference in amount of force required for fracture among groups when surface area was corrected for
In Goldschmidt’s 2017 paper “The Influence of Force Direction on the Fracture Pattern and Fracture Resistance of Canine Teeth in Dogs,” what treatment groups/force directions were tested and what was the association of fracture propagation pattern and force direction?
JVD 2017
Distal to mesial
Labial to lingual
Mesial to distal
Most common fracture propagation pattern for each group was in the same direction as the load direction
In Goldschmidt’s 2017 paper “The Influence of Force Direction on the Fracture Pattern and Fracture Resistance of Canine Teeth in Dogs,” what type and direction of fractures were most common and what was the association of H/D ratio and crack propagation to failure?
JVD 2017
Transverse fractures in direction of force most common
When H/D ratio > 1 increasing height is protective againist crack propagation to failure when a longitudinal load is placed on the cusp tip
In Mestrinho’s 2019 study “Retrospective study of 18 titanium alloy crowns produced by computer-aided design and manufacturing in dogs,” how many crowns were lost and what was the mean survival time for the crowns?
Frontiers 2019
2/18 crowns lost
1/2 lost 2 times
Mean survival time 58 months (1,740 days)
similar to Fink, Reiter 2015 study mean survival time 1600 days
In Matelski’s 2020 study “Effect of Alternative Palatal Root Access Technique on Fracture Resistance of Root Canal Treated Maxillary Fourth Premolar Teeth in Dogs,” what treatment groups were tested?
Goldschmidt Frontiers 2020
1.) Conservative access site/control: 2mm diameter transcoronal mesiobuccal access/single mesial site, 2mm distal canal access
2.) Increased mesiobuccal access: mesiobuccal transcoronal access 4mm, distal 2mm
3.) Direct palatal access: 2mm mesiobuccal, distal and palatal access sites
4.) Palatal hemisection: palatal root extracted
In Matelski’s 2020 study “Effect of Alternative Palatal Root Access Technique on Fracture Resistance of Root Canal Treated Maxillary Fourth Premolar Teeth in Dogs,” what was the association between H/D ratio and maximum force to fracture?
Goldschmidt Frontiers 2020
No stat sig association between crown H/D ratio and maximum force to fracture
However, for each standard deviation increase in crown H/D ratio (0.04) there was an associated decrease of 14 N (95% CI: −121, 93) in the resulting force to fracture
Not stat sig likely due to small variation in H/D ratio
In Matelski’s 2020 study “Effect of Alternative Palatal Root Access Technique on Fracture Resistance of Root Canal Treated Maxillary Fourth Premolar Teeth in Dogs,” what was the association between mean force to fracture among treatment groups?
No stat sig difference in mean force to fracture between treatment groups or between control and treatment groups
HOWEVER palatal root hemisection group had highest mean force to fracture
In Matelski’s 2020 study “Effect of Alternative Palatal Root Access Technique on Fracture Resistance of Root Canal Treated Maxillary Fourth Premolar Teeth in Dogs,” what were the three most common types of fractures in descending order?
Goldschmidt Frontiers 2020
CCF 65%
CCRF
RF
In Matelski’s 2020 study “Effect of Alternative Palatal Root Access Technique on Fracture Resistance of Root Canal Treated Maxillary Fourth Premolar Teeth in Dogs,” what was the mean maximum force to fracture and how did it compare with previously reported force to fracture of intact teeth?
Goldschmidt Frontiers 2020
Mean maximum force to fracture all endontically treated teeth in study: 831N
Intact teeth mean maximum force to fracture: 1,281N
suggests that endodontically treated teeth have a decreased fracture resistance similar to people
In Ribka’s 2022 paper “Success of Feather Margin Preparation for Full Metal Prosthodontic Crowns in the Canine Teeth in 84 Pet and Working Dogs (2005-2017),” how did the success rate of feather preparations compare to canine teeth with full metal crowns in Fink’s 2015 study?
Niemiec JVD 2022
Present study feather margins 97.5% success rate
Chamfer margin canines Fink 2015 92%
No stat sig difference between the two
In Ribka’s 2022 paper “Success of Feather Margin Preparation for Full Metal Prosthodontic Crowns in the Canine Teeth in 84 Pet and Working Dogs (2005-2017),” what percent of teeth were endodontically treated and what was the association between endodontically treated vs non-endodontically treated teeth and failure rates?
Neimiec JVD 2022
46% endodontically treated
No stat sig difference in failure rates between teeth treated endodontically and those not treated endodontically prior to crown placement
In Ribka’s 2022 paper “Success of Feather Margin Preparation for Full Metal Prosthodontic Crowns in the Canine Teeth in 84 Pet and Working Dogs (2005-2017),” what was the overall failure rate and how many were due to fractures vs adhesive/bond failure?
Neimiec JVD 2022
Overall failure rate 2.5% (4/160 teeth)
Tooth fracture 2/4
Adehsive failure 1/4
Wore through crown 1/4
In Morris’ 2022 study “Success of Occlusal Aperture Access for Endodontic Therapy of Canine Teeth in Dogs,” what was the overall success rate and what percent of teeth did not require any further restorative treatment?
Hale JVD 2022
100% of treated teeth did not require extraction or further endodontic treatment
83% did not require any further restorative treatment
In Morris’ 2022 study “Success of Occlusal Aperture Access for Endodontic Therapy of Canine Teeth in Dogs,” what percent of dogs had damaged other teeth at follow up evaluation?
Hale JvD 2022
53% of dogs had trauma (abrasion, UCF, CCF)
In Morris’ 2022 study “Success of Occlusal Aperture Access for Endodontic Therapy of Canine Teeth in Dogs,” what were the two main clinical conclusions?
Hale JVD 2022
natural canine crown can remain healthy without the protection of a prosthetic crown
Conservation of crown with only one access site may leave the tooth stronger than with mesial access and additional restoration
When referencing implantology, what is the emergence profile?
It is the way the tooth emerges from the bone in relation to the gum tissue, it directly influences surrounding tissue and adjacent teeth. Good emergence profile is important to prevent plaque being trapped at soft tissue/crown interface and protect crestal gingiva from recession related to mastication.
The image shows what step of dental implant placement in a cat?
Mele. Feline Dental Implants: Long-Term Follow-Up of Two Cases. JVD 2017
First surgery: cover screw placement into implant prior to flap closure
The image shows what step of dental implant placement in a cat?
Mele. Feline Dental Implants: Long-Term Follow-Up of Two Cases. JVD 2017
Second procedure 6 months after implant placement
5mm tissue punch used to expose implant
Image shows healing abutment placed into implant
Healing abutment helps develop the soft tissue at punched site
The image below shows what step of dental implant placement in a cat?
Mele. Feline Dental Implants: Long-Term Follow-Up of Two Cases. JVD 2017
3rd procedure: 3 weeks after healing abutment placement
Impression abutment placed
Soft tissue stone model with implant analog attached to closed tray impression abutment made
The image below shows what step of dental implant placement in a cat?
Mele. Feline Dental Implants: Long-Term Follow-Up of Two Cases. JVD 2017
Fourth procedure: patient returned in 1 month for placement of prosthesis
Cemented into integrated implant with dual-cure resin cement
What are the surgical and restorative phases of implant placement?
Mele. Feline Dental Implants: Long-Term Follow-Up of Two Cases. JVD 2017
Surgical phase: extraction of tooth and placement of the implant subcrestally, flap closed and implant left to osseointegrate for 5-6 months
Restorative phases: Placement of healing abutment for soft tissue healing, placement of impression abutment for prosthesis impression, placement of prosthesis
What is the implant stability quotient (ISQ)
Mele. Feline Dental Implants: Long-Term Follow-Up of Two Cases. JVD 2017
Value on a scale of 1 to 100 which indicates level of stability and osseointegration in dental implants obtained via resonance frequency analysis
Acceptable range 55-85 ISQ
In Aramburu’s 2021 study “Correlation of Fracture Resistance of Dental Implants and Bite Force in Dogs described in the literature: An In Vitro Study,” what treatment group had the highest values of resistance and strength?
JVD 2021
Group 3: 5.0mm diameter implant stat sig greater resistance and strength than smaller diameter implant groups
group 1: 3.3mm, Group 2: 4.0mm