Module 8 Flashcards
Immutability of species
The idea that each individual species on the planet was specially created by God and could never fundamentally change
Microevolution
The theory that natural selection can, over time, take an organism and transform it into a more specialized species of that organism
Macroevolution
The hypothesis that processes similar to those at work in microevolution can, over eons of time, transform an organism into a completely different kind of organism
Strata
Distinct layers of rock
Fossils
Preserved remains of once-living organism
Paleontology
The study of fossils
Structural homology
The study of similar structures in different species
Natural selection
The process by which organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring
Where did Darwin do most of the work that led to his hypothesis of evolution?
Onboard the HMS Beagle
Did Darwin ever recant his scientific beliefs?
No
What was the main idea that Thomas Malthus’s work gave to Darwin?
The idea that organisms are in a constant struggle for survival. Without this, Darwin wouldn’t have come up with natural selection
What was the main idea that Sir Charles Lyell’s work gave to Darwin?
The idea that the present is the key to the past. He thought that the entire geological column could be explained by referring to the same processes that we see happening today
What age-old concept was Darwin able to dispel with his research?
The idea of the immutability of the species. By showing the evidence for microevolution, Darwin was able to show that species did change
From a genetic point of view, what is the main difference between microevolution and macroevolution?
In microevolution, the same genetic code exists throughout the change. The changes that occur are simply the result of variation within that genetic code. In order for macroevolution to occur, information must be added to the genetic code, essentially creating a new genetic code
Is the geological column evidence for, against, or inconclusive to macroevolution? Why?
It is inconclusive because if you believe that the geological column was formed according to the speculations of Lyell, it is evidence for macroevolution because it shows that life forms early in earth’s history were simple and gradually got more complex. If you believe that the geological column was formed by natural catastrophe, then it is evidence against macroevolution. Since geologists have seen rock strata formed each way, it is impossible to tell which belief is scientifically correct