Mandible OMF Flashcards
A 12-year-old boy is brought to the emergency department after he fell while riding his bike and landed on the chin. Panorex radiographs show a minimally displaced fracture of the high right condylar neck and an open left parasymphyseal fracture. Which of the following is the most effective management?
(A) Observation with serial radiographs and restriction to soft diet
(B) Intermaxillary fixation with infraorbital and circummandibular wires for four weeks
(C) Intermaxillary fixation with arch bars for four weeks
(D) Open reduction with internal fixation of the parasymphyseal fracture and arch bars for two weeks
(E) Open reduction with internal fixation of both the parasymphyseal fracture and the fracture of the high condylar neck
The correct response is Option D.
Observation alone is inadequate management of the parasymphyseal fracture. This child presents in the late phase of the mixed dentition and should have enough adult dentition in place to secure the arch bars. Wires to reduce the fractures will not provide as much stability as arch bars. This technique, however, is useful in the child who does not yet have enough adult dentition to secure the arch bars.
Immobilization for a short period (i.e., two weeks) is the appropriate management of the condylar neck fracture. This will help to allow the fractures to become stable enough to maintain the reduction once movement is instituted. Early movement helps to decrease the risk of ankylosis of the temporal mandibular joint. Extended immobilization to allow for healing of the parasymphyseal fracture will increase the risk of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the parasymphyseal fracture will ensure an anatomic reduction of a stable skeletal unit. This, in turn, will decrease the risk of infection and nonunion.
ORIF of the condylar neck fracture is not indicated because the fracture is minimally displaced. Conservative management of these fractures is well accepted and has stood the test of time. Open reduction would incur the risks of injury of the facial nerve.
A 63-year-old woman is admitted to the hospital with a fracture to the left mandibular angle that she sustained in a motor vehicle collision. Open reduction and internal fixation is planned via a submandibular (Risdon) incision. The region between which of the following planes of dissection is most appropriate for approaching the fracture and avoiding injury to the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve?
A) Carotid sheath and the posterior belly of the digastric muscle
B) Platysma and the superficial (investing) layer of the deep cervical fascia
C) Skin and the platysma
D) Submandibular gland and the carotid sheath
E) Superficial (investing) layer of the deep cervical fascia and the submandibular gland
The correct response is Option E.
The submandibular approach to the mandibular body/ramus is an important surgical approach to address a number of facial fractures. An understanding of the anatomy of the submandibular region is crucial to performing this approach with minimal complications.
The marginal mandibular nerve leaves branches off the facial nerve trunk during its intraparotid course. One to three branches usually exit the inferior border of the parotid gland before changing course to travel along the mandibular border toward the symphysis. In almost all cases, the marginal mandibular nerve travels superficial to or within the investing layer of the deep cervical fascia as it courses anteriorly.
In several cadaveric studies, the nerve consistently coursed within 1 cm below the mandibular border posterior to the facial vessels, and above the mandibular border anterior to the facial vessels.
The submandibular approach to facial fractures involves incising the skin 2 cm below the mandibular border, dividing the platysma and dissecting deep to the investing fascia, just above the submandibular gland . Once in this plane, the course of dissection is carried superiorly toward the mandibular border.
A 22-year-old man sustains a left subcondylar fracture of the mandible during a motor vehicle collision. On CT scan, the condyle is displaced medially and anteriorly. This displacement is most likely caused by tension from which of the following muscles?
(A) Medial pterygoid
(B) Lateral pterygoid
(C) Masseter
(D) Mylohyoid
(E) Temporalis
The correct response is Option B.
The inferior belly of the lateral pterygoid originates from the lateral pterygoid plate and inserts onto the scaphoid fossa of the condyle and joint capsule. The superior belly of the lateral pterygoid muscle originates from the sphenoid and inserts on the temporomandibular joint. The effect of the lateral pterygoid muscle is to displace the condyle medially and anteriorly in fractures of the condylar neck. It also tends to displace the meniscus anteriorly. The muscles inserting directly on the mandible exert significant forces on fracture fragments. An understanding of their direction of pull and insertions is important in the proper reduction and fixation of mandibular fractures. All the muscles of mastication serve to elevate and protrude the mandible. The elevators include the masseter, medial pterygoid, and temporalis. The temporalis inserts onto the coronoid process and the superior aspect of the external oblique line. The masseter inserts onto the lateral aspect of the mandibular angle while the medial pterygoid inserts on the medial aspect of the mandibular angle. None of these muscles directly affect the condyle. The mylohyoid muscle inserts on the body of the mandible, displacing segmental body fractures medially.
A 33-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department after sustaining injuries in a motor vehicle collision. The patient notes pain on opening her mouth. Physical examination shows bilateral facial swelling and loss of posterior facial height. An anterior open bite is also noted. Which of the following additional findings on physical examination is most likely to suggest a bilateral subcondylar fracture in this patient?
A) Bilateral facial numbness
B) Bilateral mastoid ecchymosis
C) Blood in the external auditory canal
D) Clear fluid in the external auditory canal
E) Preauricular pain
The correct response is Option E.
Bilateral subcondylar fractures result in premature occlusion of the posterior teeth along with an anterior open bite, loss of posterior facial height, and bilateral facial swelling with pain on mouth opening. These findings occur because the subcondylar fracture interrupts the integrity of the vertical buttress. The lateral pterygoid muscles displace the condylar necks medially and anteriorly, allowing the unopposed vertical action of the temporalis and masseter muscles to shorten the posterior facial height. Swelling bilaterally would be expected in this fracture, and opening would displace the fracture line, causing pain.
Bilateral facial numbness suggests a fracture of the ramus or body as the inferior alveolar nerve traverses these areas. Blood in the external auditory canal suggests a fracture more proximal than subcondylar. Bilateral mastoid ecchymosis and/or clear fluid in the external auditory canal suggest a skull base fracture.
In pediatric patients, abnormalities in mandibular growth are most closely associated with fractures involving which of the following regions of the mandible?
(A) Angle
(B) Body
(C) Condyle
(D) Ramus
(E) Symphysis
The correct response is Option C.
In children, abnormalities in mandibular growth are most closely associated with fractures involving the mandibular condyle. More than one-third of all facial fractures in children involve the mandible. The pediatric condyle, which is the primary growth center of the mandible, is immature, highly vascular, and covered with a thin sheath of periosteum. Any compressive or traumatic forces may cause the condyle to burst, rather than fracture, resulting in fragmentation of bone, hemarthrosis, and increased osteogenic potential. Ankylosis and growth disturbances are potential long-term complications. According to one study, 47% of children who sustained condylar fractures subsequently developed temporomandibular joint dysfunction or abnormalities of facial growth.
In order to maintain the height of the mandibular ramus and adequate function of the temporomandibular joint, appropriate management should include closed reduction and immobilization for five to eight days, followed by initiation of physical therapy.
Which of the following regions of the adult mandible has the highest incidence of fracture?
(A) Angle
(B) Body
(C) Coronoid
(D) Ramus
(E) Symphysis
The correct response is Option A.
The angle of the mandible has the highest incidence of fracture €”up to 30%. Incidence of fracture is 15% to 20% for the body and parasymphysis. The presence of an isolated symphyseal or parasymphyseal fracture should alert the surgeon to the possibility of a second fracture near the angle.
Which of the following mechanisms of action of the mandible occurs during the terminal 4 cm to 5 cm of jaw opening?
(A) Rotation within the lower joint space
(B) Rotation within the upper joint space
(C) Translation and rotation within the lower joint space
(D) Translation within the lower joint space
(E) Translation within the upper joint space
The correct response is Option E.
Normal opening of the mandible results from the synchronized movements of muscles surrounding the joint space. The articular disk separates the joint space into upper and lower spaces. The combination of motions of the mandibular condyle generates the motion of the temporomandibular joint. At rest and during rotation, the mandibular condyle is located in the lower joint space. During translation, the condyle moves into the upper joint space.
Most patients have a maximal incisal opening of 4 cm to 5 cm. The initial 1 cm to 2 cm of jaw opening involves rotatory, or hinge, movements. Jaw opening at 2 cm to 3 cm is a combination of rotation and translation. The terminal 3 cm to 5 cm of jaw opening involves translatory movements only.
A 22-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department after being hit by a car where she was intubated at the scene. A maxillofacial CT scan performed on admission shows a non-displaced right mandibular parasymphaseal fracture. She is extubated later that day after being cleared by trauma. Upon reevaluation the next morning, significant malocclusion with a step-off between the right mandibular cuspid and lateral incisor is noted. She has a right-sided open bite. Which of the following mechanisms most likely explains the change in physical examination findings after extubation?
A) Delayed disruption of the periodontal ligament
B) Differential pull of muscles on the mandible
C) Dissipation of post-traumatic edema
D) Fibrinolysis of the fracture hematoma
E) Refracture of the parasymphysis

The correct response is Option B.
This patient has a right mandibular parasymphyseal fracture that is in an unfavorable orientation. The right temporalis and pterygomasseteric sling will work naturally to close the mandible while the floor of mouth musculature, including the mylohyoid, work to open the mandible at the level of the symphysis. Because of the orientation of the fracture, these forces distract the fracture, causing it to become more displaced. When this patient was first examined, the paralytic agent she received when she was intubated at the scene inhibited those distraction forces and kept her in appropriate occlusion. However, upon extubation, she fell out of occlusion as those muscle groups separated the fracture. While hematoma fibrinolysis and edema reduction occur after mandible fractures, they are not likely to result in displacement of the fracture. The periodontal ligament has no role in fracture displacement.
An edentulous 65-year-old man sustains bilaterally displaced fractures of the mandibular body in a motor vehicle collision. Which of the following is most effective for determining the patient’s maxillomandibular relationship prior to the application of rigid fixation?
(A) Analysis with a face-bow
(B) CT scans of the face
(C) Custom-fabricated intraoral splints
(D) Erich arch bars
(E) Plain radiographs
The correct response is Option C.
Management of maxillomandibular fractures involves determination of the anatomic relationship of the maxilla and mandible to each other, as well as to the cranial base. After the orientation of the jaws has been established, the fracture segments can be exposed and rigid fixation can be applied. Human teeth are typically used to establish maxillomandibular orientation; however, this is not possible in the edentulous patient. Custom-fabricated intraoral splints or the patient’s own dentures can instead be rigidly fixed to the maxilla and mandible using wire or screws. The maxilla and mandible can then be brought into occlusion and fixed together.
A face-bow is used to determine the relationship of the maxilla and the midface to the cranial base; the mandible is not assessed. Plain radiographs and CT scans of the face are also helpful in determining the extent of the patient’s injuries and in planning surgery, but not in establishing skeletal orientation. Erich arch bars can only be used in patients with functional dental occlusion.
A 35-year-old woman has minimally displaced bilateral subcondylar fractures of the mandible without loss of posterior vertical height, but she reports subjective malocclusion. Which of the following is the most appropriate management of this patient?
A) Advise the patient to eat a soft diet for 6 weeks
B) Application of a gunning splint for 8 weeks
C) Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) for 4 to 6 weeks
D) MMF for 1 week
E) MMF for 8 to 10 weeks
The correct response is Option C.
Closed reduction has historically been the standard treatment option for subcondylar fractures of the mandible. Its widespread use is attributed to the idea that closed reduction results in fewer complications with similar functional and aesthetic outcomes compared with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). For instance, complications such as facial nerve damage and excessive scarring are significantly decreased due to the noninvasive nature of this approach. However, as highlighted by the ongoing debate, a consensus regarding outcomes between open and closed reduction is not evident in the literature. In short, some studies conclude that both approaches produce roughly similar results, while others have associated an array of unfavorable outcomes with closed reduction. These include facial asymmetry, deviation upon mouth opening, skeletal malocclusion, and chronic pain of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). The fact that many of these parameters lack standardization in time course of treatment further obscures the debate. Larger studies with consistent parameters are needed to reassess outcomes with the surgical techniques and technology present today. However, it is unlikely that a large enough trial will deliver granular evidence to conclusively quell this debate.
Another controversial point regarding closed reduction is the length of time a patient should spend in maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). Many surgeons choose to apply fixation for a very short period (ie, 2 weeks) to avoid ankylosis of the TMJ secondary to forced immobilization during MMF. While the etiology of ankylosis is not completely understood, it is hypothesized that trauma leading to intracapsular hematoma results in fibrosis and excessive bone formation, ultimately causing hypomobility of the affected side.
Given the current hypothesis, ankylosis of the TMJ is likely a manifestation of direct injury within the joint capsule or condylar head itself. It is imperative to point out that as a result, there should be a decreased risk for ankylosis in subcondylar fractures compared with fractures of the condylar head. Therefore, the position of the fracture line relative to the joint capsule should be closely examined, and a longer period of MMF should be employed if there is no involvement of the condylar head, disc, or capsule. A longer period of MMF results in better union of the fractured segments with no increase in the incidence of ankylosis. In a nondisplaced fracture or minimally displaced fracture with a functional occlusion, 4 to 6 weeks of MMF followed by 2 to 3 weeks of guiding elastics is recommended. The same treatment applies in the case of nondisplaced bilateral fractures. However, this scenario is less common because the force parameters to cause the bilateral fractures are often greater and tend to displace the fracture fragments significantly, necessitating ORIF.
A 16-year-old boy is evaluated for multiple fractures to the mandible after crashing his ATV into a tree. Which of the following modalities best takes advantage of load-bearing osteosynthesis in the management of this patient’s fractures?
A) Bicortical border plate for a mandibular parasymphyseal fracture
B) Champy plate fixation for a mandibular angle fracture
C) Lag screw fixation for a displaced fracture of the mandibular symphysis
D) Locking reconstruction plate for a comminuted mandibular body fracture
E) Maxillomandibular fixation for a minimally displaced mandibular subcondylar fracture
The correct response is Option D.
Load-bearing osteosynthesis differs from load-sharing osteosynthesis in that the fracture plate assumes all of the load of the given bone rather than distributing the load among the plate and the bone.
Examples of load-sharing osteosynthesis include lag screw fixation, maxillomandibular fixation, nonlocking mandibular border plate, and monocortical miniplate (Champy principle) fixation.
An example of load-bearing fixation is a mandibular locking reconstruction plate for a comminuted fracture.
A 22-year-old man sustains a transverse, noncomminuted fracture of the right mandibular angle when he is struck in the face during a fistfight. Which of the following interventions best adheres to Champy’s principle for management of this fracture?
(A) Dynamic compression plate with bicortical screws on the inferior edge of the mandible and a superior tension band
(B) Dynamic compression plate with bicortical screws and a mandibular arch bar
(C) Lag screw
(D) Miniplate with monocortical screws along the external oblique ridge
(E) Reconstruction plate with bicortical screws
The correct response is Option D.
Champy’s principles for fracture management call for placement of miniplates along the lines of tension in the mandible at the site of the fracture. Because compression is not necessary, the miniplates can be anchored with monocortical screws. Based on the muscular forces pulling on the mandible, Champy determined that, anterior to the canine tooth, two miniplates are needed to control the rotational forces of the genial and digastric muscles; posterior to the canine tooth, just one miniplate is required.
In a 10-year review examining various methods for treating fractures of the mandibular angle, Ellis concluded that use of a single 2.0-mm noncompression miniplate was associated with fewer complications than a double-plate system (one using two compression or noncompression plates) or a reconstruction plate.
A 6-year-old boy is brought to the emergency department following facial trauma from falling on his bicycle handlebars. Which of the following mandible fracture locations is most commonly associated with anterior open bite?
A) Angle
B) Body
C) Coronoid
D) Subcondylar/condylar
E) Symphysis/parasymphysis
The correct response is Option D.
Anterior open bite, also known as apertognathia, is vertical separation of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. It is caused by premature contact of the posterior molars, most commonly following bilateral subcondylar mandible fracture. When present, a unilateral subcondylar/condylar fracture causes an open bite on the side opposite the fracture.
A 25-year-old man who sustained a fracture of the maxillary alveolus involving the right central and lateral incisors is scheduled to undergo operative reduction and application of an arch bar in the emergency department for stabilization of the fracture. Adequate local anesthesia in this patient involves blockade of which of the following nerves?
(A) Greater palatine and anterior superior alveolar
(B) Greater palatine and buccal
(C) Nasopalatine and anterior superior alveolar
(D) Nasopalatine and buccal
(E) Infraorbital and middle superior alveolar
The correct response is Option C.
This 25-year-old man is to undergo operative reduction of a fracture of the maxillary alveolus involving the right central and lateral incisors, followed by application of an arch bar. To obtain a sensory blockade, the surgeon must anesthetize the nasopalatine nerve to block the palate (lingual surface) and the anterior superior alveolar nerve to block the teeth and alveolar mucosa (buccal surface). The nasopalatine nerve originates from the infraorbital nerve and passes through the incisive foramen to reach the anterior hard palate. It innervates the premaxilla at this point, then extends posteriorly to innervate the maxillary cuspids. The anterior superior alveolar nerve branches from the infraorbital nerve after it exits the infraorbital foramen and provides innervation to the maxillary incisors and canine teeth.
The greater palatine nerve emerges from the greater palatine foramen and provides sensation to the posterior portion of the hard palate.
The buccal nerve provides sensation to the buccal mucosa and lower gingiva.
The middle and posterior superior alveolar nerves are derived from the infraorbital nerve after it exits the pterygopalatine fossa. The middle superior alveolar nerve innervates the bicuspids, and the posterior superior alveolar nerve innervates the first, second, and third molars within the maxilla.
An 18-year-old man is evaluated for a mandibular fracture sustained in a motor vehicle collision. CT scan shows displaced left parasymphyseal and right mandibular body fractures. Resorbable plate fixation is planned. Compared with titanium implants, the use of resorbable fixation to treat this fracture is associated with which of the following?
A) Decreased postoperative pain
B) Decreased risk for malunion
C) Increased overall cost
D) Increased risk for infection
E) Lower hardware profile
The correct response is Option C.
Bioresorbable fixation is now widely employed in craniomaxillofacial surgery. While this technology has theoretical advantages in the treatment of craniosynostosis (e.g., obviates concerns of intracranial implant migration), the benefits of orthognathic surgery and the management of facial trauma are dubious. For mandibular fractures, several studies have found no statistical differences in overall or specific complication rates, including the need for plate removal, postoperative infection, malreduction/malocclusion, postoperative pain, or loss of fixation. Rigorous comparisons are lacking, but a recent comprehensive review of the reported studies demonstrated a trend toward increased complications using resorbable fixation to treat facial fractures. The only consistent difference is the cost of the implants, which is considerably higher for the resorbable systems.
A 16-year-old girl is brought to the emergency department after sustaining fractures to the mandible in a rollover motor vehicle collision. She is intubated during the primary survey because of her critical airway. A CT scan is shown. Which of the following is the most appropriate treatment of this fracture pattern?
A) Maxillomandibular fixation only
B) Observation and soft diet
C) Open reduction and internal fixation of both the right body and the left angle fractures
D) Open reduction and internal fixation of the right body fracture only
E) Secondary mandible reconstruction after 6 weeks

The correct response is Option C.
This CT scan shows right–body and left–angle fractures, both with clinically significant displacement. Modern facial fracture management dictates early primary reduction and repair; therefore observation and soft diet without surgery is incorrect, as is avoiding disturbance of the mandible and allowing 6 weeks of bone healing.
Since she has reached the age of skeletal maturity permanent titanium hardware is an accepted modality of treatment; therefore it is incorrect to avoid hardware and rely on non-reduced maxillomandibular fixation. In addition, an angle fracture cannot typically be treated with maxillomandibular fixation alone, but requires a Champy plate or more rigid fixation. Open reduction and internal fixation of the right–body fracture, without repairing the left angle is incorrect, as Champy lines do not preclude the need for fixation. Open reduction and internal fixation of both the right body and the left angle fractures is correct, as both fractures need to be reduced, and then fixated, for the best chance of restoring occlusion.
A 25-year-old man was assaulted 72 hours ago and presents with a noncomminuted, minimally displaced right angle fracture of the mandible. The plastic surgeon plans to perform open reduction and internal fixation. Which of the following factors is most likely to place the patient at greatest risk for a postoperative complication?
A) Perioperative ampicillin-sulbactam administration
B) Placement of two mini-plates
C) Postoperative maxillomandibular fixation
D) Sex of patient
E) Time to operative intervention
The correct response is Option B.
In multiple studies, the use of a single plate along either the oblique ridge or the lateral cortex demonstrates the lowest incidence of complications for this type of fracture. Specifically, placement of two mini-plates has been associated with an increased risk for postoperative complication. Postoperative maxillomandibular fixation has not been shown to influence the incidence of complications. Furthermore, time to operative intervention and the sex of the patient have not been shown to increase the complication rate. Factors such as smoking and the number of fractures have been associated with an increased risk for complication with mandible fractures. Finally, perioperative ampicillin-sulbactam administration has been shown to decrease the risk for complications in this patient population.
In planning open reduction and internal fixation in a patient with a low subcondylar neck fracture, which of the following extraoral incisions provides the safest and most versatile exposure to the fracture site?
(A) Postauricular
(B) Preauricular
(C) Retromandibular
(D) Submandibular
The correct response is Option C.
The retromandibular incision provides the safest and most versatile exposure for open reduction and internal fixation of submandibular fractures. When compared with the subcondylar and preauricular incisions, there is significantly less injury to the marginal mandibular, temporal, and zygomatic branches of the facial nerve.
The retromandibular incision allows access superiorly to the coronoid notch and inferiorly to the angle of the mandible. The addition of a transfacial trocar to this approach facilitates access to higher level subcondylar fractures as well. The preauricular, postauricular, and submandibular incisions provide a more limited view of low subcondylar fractures.
A 46-year-old man comes to the office because he has pain in the jaw and trismus after being involved in a motor vehicle collision two days ago. Radiographs show a mandibular fracture. In adults, the normal range of vertical mandibular opening is closest to which of the following?
(A) 11 to 20 mm
(B) 21 to 30 mm
(C) 31 to 40 mm
(D) 41 to 50 mm
(E) 51 to 60 mm
The correct response is Option D.
In adults, the vertical mandibular opening measured from maxillary incisal edge to mandibular incisal edge (interincisal distance) typically ranges from 40 to 50 mm. In addition, normal range of motion of the mandible includes lateral jaw excursion (measured at the midline incisor) to 10 mm on each side.
Decreased mandibular opening may indicate dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) or surrounding soft tissues. Patients who may potentially have internal derangement of the TMJ also may experience painless clicking when opening the mouth.
A 35-year-old woman is unhappy with the appearance of her “square face,” especially at the bottom jaw “near the corners,” and she wishes to have a smoother mandible contour permanently. Which of the following is the most appropriate treatment?
A) Alloplastic implant
B) Autologous fat grafting
C) Hyaluronic acid dermal filler
D) Mandible angle and body contouring
E) Suction lipectomy
The correct response is Option D.
Mandible contouring surgery, frequently called mandible angle reduction, is a bony procedure to decrease the angular contours in a “square face” or bottom jaw with “sharp corners.” The term “mandible angle” reduction is a misnomer, as usually both the mandible angle and the mandible body need to be gracefully contoured or resected to result in an aesthetically pleasing, rounder face.
Although fillers, fat grafting, and implants are used in the face, they are not usually used for mandible contouring. Suction lipectomy for a patient with a square jaw would not be successful.
A 5-year-old child has malocclusion and limited opening of the mouth after falling from playground equipment. A CT scan is shown. Which of the following is the most likely long-term sequela of this patient’s injury?
(A) Bimaxillary prognathism
(B) Mandibular hypoplasia
(C) Mandibular prognathism
(D) Maxillary hypoplasia
(E) Maxillary prognathism

The correct response is Option B.
This child is at increased risk for mandibular hypoplasia. The condyle serves as a growth center for the mandible and contributes primarily to vertical growth. The condylar cartilage is a site of secondary passive growth dependent on forces acting on it, notably the medial and lateral pterygoid muscles. Pediatric condylar fractures generally remodel and do not often cause growth disturbance. However, the thin, localized functional matrix of the condyle may disallow normal mandibular growth after it has been injured and may result in unilateral or bilateral hypoplasia depending on the injury. Pediatric mandibular fractures are frequently treated conservatively via closed reduction and short periods of maxillomandibular fixation.
A 25-year-old man with a fracture of the mandibular angle is evaluated for open reduction and internal fixation. Which of the following is the most appropriate location for placement of internal fixation when using the Champy technique in this patient?
A) External oblique ridge
B) Lingula
C) Mandibular notch
D) Mental tubercle
E) Mylohyoid line
The correct response is Option A.
This technique for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures was first described by Michelet in 1972, and biomechanical studies by Champy et al were published in 1976. In his original paper, Champy advocated placement of an internal fixation miniplate along the external oblique line of the mandible. By contouring the plate to this line, rigid fixation is achieved in two planes, taking advantage of the force vectors along the angle of the mandible to help compress the fracture site.
Mylohyoid line is not appropriate because the mylohyoid line is located along the lingual surface of the mandibular body and is not used routinely as a location for plate fixation for mandibular fractures.
Lingula is not appropriate because the lingula is located along the lingual surface of the mandibular ramus, and is the location where the mandibular nerve (V3) enters the mandible. Plate fixation should be avoided in this area because of the difficulty of exposure and the risk for damaging the mandibular nerve.
Mental tubercle is not appropriate because the mental tubercle is not an appropriate place to apply internal fixation when utilizing the Champy technique.
Mandibular notch is not appropriate because it is located between the mandibular condyle and the coronoid process and is not an appropriate place to apply internal fixation when utilizing the Champy technique.
A 6 year old boy is evaluated because of severe pain on opening his mouth. One week ago, he hit his chin in a fall. Physical examination shows chin deviation to the right and premature contact of the molar region on the right. Facial radiographs are ordered. The most likely cause of these findings is fracture of which of the following segments of the mandible?
(A) Angle
(B) Body
(C) Condyle
(D) Ramus
(E) Symphysis
The correct response is Option C.
Mandibular condyle fractures are the most common facial fractures seen in children. In a recent review of more than 1250 pediatric maxillofacial fractures, condylar injuries constituted 34.9% of all mandible fractures; however, the angle (17.7%), body (14.9%), ramus (8%), and symphysis (9%) are also important sites of potential mandible fracture.
A 25-year-old healthy man presents with a painful clicking when opening and closing his mouth 12 weeks after being involved in a physical altercation. He is able to chew and open and close his mouth normally, but with discomfort. Anteroposterior x-ray study shows no abnormalities. Which of the following is the most likely source of his discomfort?
A) Articular disc subluxation
B) Dynamic condylar subluxation
C) Early arthritis
D) Occult fracture of the condylar head
E) Spasm of the lateral pterygoid muscle
The correct response is Option A.
This patient likely has increased mobility of the articular disc. This can occur as a result of acute trauma (as in this case) or chronic trauma, such as bruxism. At this juncture, the disc is reducing with motion, so there is no obstruction to movement. Nevertheless, symptoms can worsen over time and create a closed-lock wherein the patient cannot open his mouth. An MRI and/or ultrasound can help confirm the pathology. With the limited and nonmechanical symptoms (eg, locking), treatment is conservative.
Arthritis is possible but unlikely in a patient of this age, especially without some other reason, such as infection or a history of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Fracture of the condylar head is possible, but this should have healed after 2 months and would be asymptomatic. Subluxation of the condylar head would restrict motion, and spasm of the lateral pterygoid can cause temporomandibular joint pain, but subluxation of the condylar head does not produce the click that is heard.










