Facial Trauma - OMF - Mandible Flashcards
During the application of rigid fixation in a 9-year-old child who has sustained a Le Fort I fracture, which of the following permanent tooth buds is at greatest risk for injury?
(A) Canine
(B) Central incisor
(C) First molar
(D) First premolar
(E) Lateral incisor
The correct response is Option A.
A 9-year-old child has mixed dentition; deciduous (primary) and permanent (secondary) teeth are present within the oral cavity simultaneously. This commonly occurs between ages 8 and 10 years. As a result, it is imperative for the surgeon to be aware of the potential for injury to the tooth buds when applying rigid fixation for management of pediatric maxillofacial fractures. The permanent canine teeth, or cuspids, erupt between ages 10 and 11 years. Therefore, the tooth buds can be injured during the application of rigid fixation in the region of the nasomaxillary buttress.
The central and lateral incisors erupt between ages 6 and 8 years. The permanent first molars erupt between ages 6 and 7 years, and the first premolars erupt between ages 8 and 9 years. Therefore, in a 9-year-old child, all of these teeth should have already begun erupting into the oral cavity, and the risk for injury to the tooth bud will be minimal.
A 65-year-old man develops a hemorrhagic stroke requiring decompressive craniotomy. The bone is found to be unusable and a customized polyetheretherketone prosthesis is planned. Which of the following is the most common complication of using this material?
A) Cerebrospinal fluid leak
B) Contour deformity
C) Dehiscence
D) Hematoma
E) Infection
The correct response is Option E.
Reports on using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as an alloplast for cranial reconstruction vary in terms of outcomes and complications. The larger studies conclude that it is a reliable material compared with other alloplastic alternatives and has the advantage of being custom made for a variety of craniofacial defects. However, infection remains the most common complication, and choosing this material should be weighed against the risk for microorganism seeding through, wound dehiscence, hematogenous spread, or indolent colonization of the wound bed.
A 41-year-old man was punched in the eye two days ago and now has numbness in his cheek and double vision. Physical examination shows paresthesias in the V2 distribution, edema of the eyelids, and proptosis. Diplopia occurs at 40 degrees of upward gaze, but there are no definite signs of entrapment. A coronal CT is shown. Which of the following is the absolute indication for repair of the orbital floor fracture in this patient?
A ) Diplopia on upward gaze
B ) Extent of orbital floor loss
C ) Medial maxillary sinus wall fracture
D ) Medial orbital wall fracture
E ) Paresthesia between the lower eyelid and upper lip

The correct response is Option B.
The absolute indication for repair of the orbital floor fracture in the patient described is the CT finding of loss of greater than 50% of the orbital floor. Without repair, this patient is prone to enophthalmos and long-term diplopia.
Diplopia, without evidence of entrapment, is not an absolute indication for operative repair of orbital floor fractures, especially when not within 20 to 30 degrees of primary gaze. Diplopia in extreme gazes is not particularly dysfunctional; therefore, it is only a relative indication for surgery. Definite entrapment noted on examination would be an indication for surgery, but it was not demonstrated in the patient described. Note on the CT the round shape (relative to the left side) of the inferior rectus muscle in coronal section. This shape is indicative of edema in the muscle, which is the likely cause of the diplopia in extreme upward gaze.
Concomitant medial maxillary sinus wall fracture is not an indication for operative repair of the orbital floor. Further, the patient described does not demonstrate such a fracture on the CT.
A fracture of the medial orbital wall is not present on the CT image. When present, a fracture of the medial orbital wall may make enophthalmos more likely. Enophthalmos would be an indication for surgery but also was not demonstrated.
Numbness between the lower eyelid and upper lip indicates injury to the infraorbital nerve, which is present in nearly all orbital floor fractures. It is usually a neurapraxic injury, which improves to some degree with time. It is not improved by surgery, and therefore this finding is not an indication for surgery.
An 18-year-old man presents with right periorbital edema and ecchymosis after an all-terrain vehicle collision. Physical examination shows enophthalmos, diplopia, and pain with eye movements. When asked to look upward from forward gaze, there is upward gaze restriction. A photograph is shown. Which of the following locations is most likely fractured?
A) Greater wing of sphenoid bone
B) Lamina papyracea of ethmoid bone
C) Orbital plate of frontal bone
D) Orbital process of maxillary bone
E) Posterior crest of lacrimal bone

The correct response is Option D.
Limitation with vertical gaze, as described in the vignette, is indicative of extraocular muscle (EOM) entrapment.
The lamina papyracea of the ethmoid bone contributes to the medial orbital wall. Fractures of the medial wall may result in medial rectus entrapment and restriction with lateral gaze. Such injuries can involve the ethmoidal/sphenoidal sinuses.
The greater wing of the sphenoid bone contributes to the lateral orbital wall. Fractures of the lateral wall are less common due to its increased strength, but at the wings of the sphenoid, bone can have serious effects on contents of the superior orbital fissure and may even involve the intraorbital portion of the optic (II) nerve.
The orbital plate of the frontal bone contributes to the superior orbital roof. Fractures of the superior roof may result in superior rectus and/or oblique entrapment. Such injuries can involve the frontal sinus, frontal lobe, supraorbital nerve, and/or supratrochlear nerve (resulting in loss of sensation of the forehead and upper eyelid).
The orbital process of the maxillary bone contributes to the inferior orbital floor. Fractures of the inferior floor may result in inferior rectus/oblique entrapment and restriction with upward gaze. Such injuries can involve the maxillary sinus and/or infraorbital nerve (resulting in malar and superior alveolar numbness).
The posterior crest of the lacrimal bone contributes to the medial orbital wall. Fractures of the medial wall may result in medial rectus entrapment and restriction with lateral gaze. Such injuries can involve the ethmoidal/sphenoidal sinuses.
A 23-year-old man is brought to the emergency department 30 minutes after sustaining a self-inflicted shotgun wound to the face. Physical examination shows loss of soft tissue of the mid face with exposed mandible and maxilla, sonorous respiration, and periods of apnea. Heart rate is 100 bpm and blood pressure is 65/30 mmHg. Which of the following is the most appropriate course of management?
A) Assess and establish airway, control bleeding, perform secondary survey, stabilize cervical spine
B) Assess and establish airway, stabilize cervical spine, control bleeding, perform secondary survey
C) Assess and establish airway, stabilize cervical spine, perform secondary survey, control bleeding
D) Stabilize cervical spine, control bleeding, assess and establish airway, perform secondary survey
E) Take the patient to the operating room for debridement of facial wound with reconstruction
The correct response is Option B.
The appropriate management sequence in this patient is to assess and establish the airway, stabilize the cervical spine, control bleeding, and perform a secondary survey. Only after the patient’s condition has been stabilized using standard Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocol would he be taken to the operating room for debridement and eventual facial reconstruction. While the deformity is obvious, and will require near-immediate attention in the operating theater, it can easily distract the evaluator from executing the ATLS management protocol.
The ATLS protocol was developed by the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma (COT) in 1980 and is the standard of care for all trauma patients. The steps of the primary survey are remembered by the mnemonic ABCDE (Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Environment/exposure). The airway is the first priority and is assessed by determining the ability of air to pass unobstructed into the lungs. Treatment may require endotracheal intubation or establishment of a surgical airway. Breathing should then be evaluated to determine the patient’s ability to ventilate and oxygenate. Circulation is evaluated by identifying hypovolemia and external sources of hemorrhage. Disability is determined by performing gross mental status and motor examinations. The final step includes patient exposure and control of the immediate environment. The secondary survey should only be completed after following the fundamental steps of the ATLS protocol.
Cervical spine injury should be assumed in all trauma patients and should be managed as such until it can be definitively excluded. This patient with a gunshot wound to the face should have the cervical spine stabilized immediately and strict cervical spine precautions should be maintained during the assessment of the patient’s airway and breathing. During assessment of the airway, the cervical spine should not be flexed, extended, or rotated. If the external neck support must be removed, a member of the trauma team should maintain control of the head and neck using the in-line immobilization technique.
A 70-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department after a fall. Examination shows periocular ecchymosis, epistaxis, and a bluish bulge of the septal mucosa. No other serious injuries are noted. CT shows fracture of the nasal septum. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
(A) Administration of intranasal oxymetazoline (Afrin)
(B) Drainage of hematomas and resection of septal cartilage
(C) Evacuation of hematomas through a direct incision
(D) Nasal packing only
(E) Needle aspiration of hematomas
The correct response is Option C.
Hematomas can develop between the septal mucoperichondrium and the cartilage in fractures and dislocations of the septum. Untreated septal hematomas may lead to septal perforation or fibrosis with eventual septal distortion, abscess, or complete septal necrosis with development of a saddle nose deformity. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of septal hematomas are essential to prevent such sequelae. Septal hematomas should be treated promptly with an L-shaped incision over the hematoma with thorough evacuation using suction and irrigation. This can be followed by loose repair of the incision to allow drainage and quilting sutures to prevent reaccumulation. It should be followed by internal nasal packing, systemic antibiotic coverage, and close follow €‘up to ensure absence of reaccumulation. Generally, although septal hematomas tend to be bilateral, they should not be incised on both sides because through €‘and €‘through septal perforation may occur. If the entire hematoma cannot be evacuated with a unilateral approach, the incisions on each side should be made at different levels.
Observation and administration of intranasal oxymetazoline (Afrin) spray are not appropriate treatment options because a persistent hematoma can result in significant morbidity. Resection of septal cartilage at the time of drainage should be avoided because septal perforation may occur. Needle aspiration can be used for small hematomas. However, it is not the treatment of choice and may require multiple attempts and extremely close follow €‘up to ensure resolution. Resection of septal cartilage at the time of drainage should be avoided because septal perforation may occur.
A 72-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after he sustained injuries in a high-speed motor vehicle collision as an unrestrained backseat passenger. He has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a 40-pack-year history of smoking. The following measurements are obtained:
Heart rate 88 bpm
Respirations 18/min
Blood pressure 115/70 mmHg
Oxygen saturation 98% on 6 L by face mask
Physical examination shows severe swelling in the face. He is coughing blood and mucus from his mouth and nose. Gross malocclusion is noted, but full dentition is present with no dental caries. CT scan shows a naso-orbital-ethmoid fracture, Le Fort III fracture, palatal fracture, and comminuted mandibular body and angle fractures. Which of the following is the most appropriate method of airway management during surgical repair of this patient’s fractures?
A) Cricothyroidotomy
B) Nasotracheal intubation
C) Placement of an orotracheal tube
D) Tracheostomy
E) Use of a laryngeal mask airway
The correct response is Option D.
The method of airway management in patients with facial fractures can be controversial and should be individualized. The patient described has complex facial fractures involving both the midface and the lower face. He also has a significant history of smoking. This particular patient is likely to have continued respiratory issues postoperatively, making pulmonary management challenging. The placement of a tracheostomy at the time of surgery will allow the surgical team full access to all of the patient’s facial fractures and will facilitate the patient’s pulmonary care postoperatively.
Cricothyroidotomy is indicated occasionally as an emergency procedure when there is concern for acute control of the patient’s airway. The patient described is hemodynamically stable and is not in respiratory distress.
Nasotracheal intubation is contraindicated in a patient with a naso-orbital-ethmoid fracture because the presence of a tube can complicate fracture reduction.
Generally, placement of an orotracheal tube is feasible and successful in most facial fracture patients. However, given the complex nature of fractures in the scenario described, the patient will need to be placed into mandibular-maxillary fixation during surgery to obtain normal occlusion and possibly for an indefinite period of time after surgery. Although the tube can occasionally be placed behind the last molar or through a gap where there is a missing tooth, an orotracheal tube can make it difficult to obtain normal occlusion. It is not as beneficial as tracheostomy in providing the postoperative pulmonary care that will likely be required in the patient described. A laryngeal mask airway does not provide as secure an airway as either orotracheal intubation or tracheostomy. During a complex facial fracture surgery, the head may need to be manipulated or turned, which could potentially dislodge a laryngeal mask airway.
Isolated orbital fractures most commonly occur in which of the following bones?
A) Ethmoid
B) Frontal
C) Lacrimal
D) Maxillary
E) Zygomatic
The correct response is Option D.
Most isolated orbital fractures involve the orbital floor, a majority of which is made up of the maxillary bone. The maxillary bone is quite thin behind the infraorbital rim, and is perforated by the infraorbital nerve passing in a canal below it. Most pure blowout fractures involve the orbital floor.
Long-term epidemiologic data regarding the natural history of orbital bone fractures are important for the evaluation of existing preventive measures and for the development of new methods of injury prevention and treatment.
A patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation of naso-orbital-ethmoid fractures 12 months ago, and epiphora was noted on follow-up examination. After 6 months of observation and persistent epiphora, which of the following is the most appropriate next step to evaluate the function of the patient’s nasolacrimal system?
A) Conjunctivorhinostomy tube placement
B) Continued observation, as function is likely to return
C) Jones tests
D) Lacrimal system flushing
E) Schirmer tests
The correct response is Option C.
The Jones test is used to evaluate lacrimal drainage. Divided into two parts, the Jones I test investigates lacrimal outflow under normal physiologic conditions. A drop of sterile 2% fluorescein solution or a moistened fluorescein strip is placed into the conjunctival fornix and a cotton-tipped wire applicator is placed into the inferior nasal meatus in the region of the ostium of the nasolacrimal duct at 2 and 5 minutes to check for fluorescein. As this test occasionally yields abnormal results in normal patients, it is not uniformly performed. The Jones II test determines the presence or absence of fluorescein when the residual fluorescein is flushed from the conjunctival sac with clear saline to determine whether there is reflux of fluorescein.
Naso-orbital-ethmoid (NOE) fractures can be challenging fractures, and either through direct instrumentation with transcanthal wiring or from the fractures themselves, the lacrimal drainage system can be affected. Postoperative epiphora can be very common and is present in at least 50% of patients who have undergone open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of an NOE fracture. After 3 to 6 months approximately half of this epiphora resolves, with the other half of patients (25%) requiring consideration for other investigations to evaluate lacrimal drainage. Schirmer test is used to evaluate dry eyes and is not appropriate in this patient.
A 12-year-old girl is brought to the emergency department after she sustained injuries in a motor vehicle collision. Physical examination shows extensive lacerations of the right medial orbit and forehead (shown) with complete transection of the medial canthal tendon (MCT). For effective reattachment of the MCT with transnasal wiring, which of the following is the most appropriate direction of resuspension of the tendon in relation to the anterior lacrimal crest?
A) Anterior and inferior
B) Anterior and superior
C) Directly horizontal
D) Posterior and inferior
E) Posterior and superior
The medial canthal tendon (MCT) consists of three limbs: 1) a prominent anterior limb that inserts medially on the anterior lacrimal crest, 2) a thinner posterior limb that attaches to the posterior lacrimal crest, and 3) a vertical limb of fascia that inserts on the medial orbital rim inferior to the nasal frontal suture. The resultant vectors of these attachments suggest that resuspension of the entire complex of the MCT following disruption should be posterior and superior to the anterior lacrimal crest.
A 10-year-old boy is brought to the physician after sustaining a nondisplaced fracture of the mandibular body in a fall. Soft diet is recommended. Two days later, he is brought back to the office and reports pain in the right mandibular lateral incisor when drinking cold liquid. The base of the defect appears yellow and is tender when probed. Examination shows a lingual fracture of the tooth crown. On the basis of these findings, which of the following is the deepest layer of exposed tooth?
A) Cementum
B) Dentin
C) Enamel
D) Pulp cavity
E) Root canal
The correct response is Option B.
This patient has a fracture of the tooth crown that extends through the dental enamel into the deeper parts of the tooth. This is evidenced by the sensitivity to touch and cold, a finding not characteristic of a fracture limited to the enamel. The yellow color to the base of the fracture indicates exposed dentin, which resides just under the hard outer enamel layer of the tooth. If the fracture had extended deeper into the pulp cavity, the area where the vessels and nerves reside, the base of the fracture would appear as a blood-filled cavity. These injuries often challenge the viability of the tooth and often require drilling and packing of the pulp space (root canal). The fracture described is of the crown and there is no indication that it involves the root of the tooth or the surrounding structures. Cementum is a bone-like covering of the tooth root and would not be affected by this injury.
The Ellis classification provides a useful system of categorizing these injuries. There are 9 categories:
Ellis I: enamel fracture. The tooth is non tender and treatment is smoothing of the rough surfaces and, possibly, application of a filling or amalgam.
Ellis II: fracture of the enamel and dentin. Tooth is tender to air, cold, and probing and the base of the defect often appears yellow.
Ellis III: involves the enamel, dentin, and the pulp space. The tooth is sensitive as in Ellis II, but the base of the defect appears red or bloody.
Ellis IV: a nonviable tooth.
Ellis V: luxation of the tooth.
Ellis VI: tooth avulsion.
Ellis VII: displacement without fracture.
Ellis VIII: fracture of entire crown.
Ellis IX: fracture of deciduous teeth.
A 12-year-old boy is brought to the emergency department because of double vision six hours after sustaining a blow to the eye with an elbow while jumping on a trampoline. He has had pain since the incident but has not had loss of consciousness. He had one episode of nausea and vomiting before arrival. Pulse rate is 45 bpm, respirations are 18/min, and blood pressure is 110/80 mmHg. Examination shows photophobia, periorbital ecchymosis, and restriction of extraocular motion. CT of the head shows a fracture of the orbital floor. Which of the following is the most appropriate time for surgical repair of the fracture?
(A) Emergently
(B) 1 to 3 Days
(C) 4 to 7 Days
(D) 8 to 14 Days
The correct response is Option A.
Observation alone is not indicated for entrapment with nausea, vomiting, and oculocardiac reflex. Recent publications in the ophthalmologic literature emphasize the importance of urgent surgical intervention to prevent ocular muscle damage, improve postoperative function, and decrease the need for additional surgery.
A 22-year-old man comes to the office because of a history of nasal trauma with resultant nasal deformity, C-shaped septal fracture, and nasal obstruction. Two weeks after injury, he undergoes closed reduction of the nasal fractures, but significant nasal obstruction persists. Which of the following is the most likely reason for his residual nasal deformity and nasal obstruction?
A) Inadequate time of nasal casting
B) Nonunion of the nasal bones
C) Presence of a septal fracture
D) Turbinate hypertrophy
E) Unidentified septal hematoma
The correct response is Option C.
One of the most important causes of failure of closed reduction to address the nasal fracture is simultaneous nasoseptal fracture. Murray, et al. found 30 to 40% residual nasal deformity after closed reduction. The cadaver study showed failure consistently associated with a C-shaped nasoseptal deviation and fracture when the external nose deviated at least 1/2 of the nasal bridge width. The theory is that the interlocking of the septal fracture creates tension causing the nasal bone to displace.
Untreated septal hematoma results in thickening of the cartilage and nasal obstruction, but not with inadequate reduction. Nasal casting for 7 to 10 days is sufficient to allow the reduction to set. Nonunion is a rare cause of inadequate reduction, usually in comminuted or open nasal fractures. Turbinate hypertrophy can cause nasal obstruction but does not interfere with nasal bone reduction.
A 24-year-old man has moderate ectropion three weeks after undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of a malar complex fracture through subciliary and intraoral incisions. Operative exploration of the orbital floor was performed to confirm fracture reduction.
Which of the following anatomic sites is the most likely origin of this patient’s ectropion?
(A) Lateral canthal ligament
(B) Orbicularis oculi
(C) Orbital septum
(D) Skin
(E) Tarsus
The correct response is Option C.
This patient has ectropion that has most likely been caused by edema and scar contracture of the orbital septum. Incision into the first eyelid crease is recommended to prevent the development of this complication. This incision has the lowest associated incidence of ectropion because it preserves the innervation of the pretarsal portion of the orbicularis oculi; therefore, normal eyelid tone is maintained. Although there is no true skin shortage seen in this patient, longstanding ectropion can lead to further untoward complications.
The lateral canthal ligament and tarsus would not be affected by this incisional approach. Cutaneous deficiencies should not occur because skin should not be resected.
A 24 year old woman is brought to the emergency department after being involved in a motor vehicle collision. Physical examination shows multiple minor abrasions of the face. Clear rhinorrhea is noted. CT of the head shows a nondisplaced fracture of the posterior table of the frontal sinus. No other serious injuries are noted. The patient is admitted to the hospital, and antibiotic therapy is initiated. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
(A) Bed rest, head elevation, and observation
(B) Cranialization of the frontal sinus
(C) Craniotomy and repair of the dural tear
(D) Lumbar puncture and drainage of spinal fluid
(E) Obliteration of the frontal sinus
The correct response is Option A.
The patient described has a nondisplaced fracture of the posterior table of the frontal sinus with a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and should be treated with antibiotic coverage and maneuvers to facilitate spontaneous resolution of the leak. These include bed rest and head elevation greater than 30 degrees. If the CSF leak persists for more than four days, spinal drainage is recommended. Prolonged CSF leakage for longer than seven to 10 days requires craniotomy, repair of the dural laceration, and either obliteration of the sinus or cranialization.
In treating frontal sinus fractures, the involvement of the anterior sinus wall, posterior sinus wall, dural lining, and frontonasal duct are the major determinants of the type and extent of treatment.
Isolated anterior wall fractures without depression do not require surgical treatment. However, some authors recommend treatment with antibiotics for one week. In patients with isolated depressed anterior wall fractures, surgical correction to restore aesthetic contour is indicated. If there is frontonasal duct injury, the sinus mucosa is removed and the cavity is obliterated. During sinus obliteration, the mucosa usually is removed and the sinus is curettaged with a sharp periosteal elevator or a high-speed burr. The frontonasal duct can then be occluded with a pericranial flap or a bone graft and the sinus obliterated with autogenous fat, dermal fat, muscle, cartilage, bone, pericranial graft, Surgicel, bone wax, or other material.
Posterior table fractures without displacement, CSF leakage, or frontonasal duct involvement do not require surgical intervention but do require antibiotic treatment.
Posterior table fractures without displacement, but with CSF leakage, are initially treated conservatively as described above. Should the leakage persist for longer than 10 days despite measures to resolve spontaneously, a craniotomy with dural repair is required. This procedure is usually done in conjunction with neurosurgical colleagues. Displaced posterior wall fractures require exploration with repair of any dural tears and either sinus obliteration or cranialization. Cranialization involves removal of the entire posterior table, plugging of the frontonasal duct, repair of any dural lacerations, and separation of the intracranial cavity from the aerodigestive tract. The frontal lobe is then expected to fall into and fill the previous sinus cavity.
Although the specifics of treatment of frontal sinus fractures remain controversial, the illustration below shows a simple algorithm for treating these fractures.
Long-term follow-up with annual CT is required for all frontal sinus fractures.
In adults, which of the following bones is most commonly fractured in isolated orbital floor fractures?
A) Ethmoid
B) Frontal
C) Lacrimal
D) Maxillary
E) Zygomatic
The correct response is Option D.
Most isolated orbital fractures involve the orbital floor made up of the maxillary bone. The maxillary bone is quite thin behind the infraorbital rim and is perforated by the infraorbital nerve passing in a canal below it. Most pure blow-out fractures involve the orbital floor with the maxillary bone making the majority of the orbital floor.
A retrospective study by Hwang et al. evaluated 391 patients with orbital bone fractures from a variety of accidents that were treated at the department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, South Korea, between February 1996 and April 2008. The medical records of these patients were reviewed and analyzed to determine the clinical characteristics and treatment of the orbital bone fractures. The following results were obtained. The mean age of the patients was 31.1 years, and the age range was 4 to 78 years. The most common age group was the third decade of life (32.5%). There was a significant male predominance in all age groups, with a ratio of 4.43:1. The most common etiology was violent (assault) or nonviolent traumatic injury (57.5%) followed by traffic accidents (15.6%) and sports injuries (10.7%). The most common isolated orbital bone fracture site was the orbital floor (26.9%). The largest group of complex fractures included the inferior region of the orbital floor and zygomaticomaxilla (18.9%). Open reduction was performed in 63.2% of the cases, and the most common fracture reconstruction material was MEDPOR (56.4%) followed by a resorbable sheet (41.1%). The postoperative complication rate was 17.9%, and there were no statistically significant differences among the reconstruction materials with regard to complications. During follow-up, diplopia, hypoesthesia, and enophthalmos occurred as complications; however, there was no significant difference between porous polyethylene sheet (MEDPOR) and resorbable sheet groups.
Long-term epidemiologic data regarding the natural history of orbital bone fractures are important for the evaluation of existing preventative measures and for the development of new methods of injury prevention and treatment.
A 25-year-old man comes to the office for evaluation of unilateral proptosis, visual impairment, and limitation of ocular movements. History includes basilar skull fractures and repair of panfacial fractures 4 weeks ago. On physical examination, the left eye appears to be pulsating. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step?
A) Beta-2 transferrin assay
B) Carotid duplex
C) Cerebral angiography
D) Craniotomy
E) Noncontrast CT scan
The correct response is Option C.
This case described represents the classic presentation of a posttraumatic carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF). Symptoms include pulsatile proptosis, ocular and orbital erythema, chemosis, diplopia, headaches, and visual loss. This pathology occurs through abnormal connections between the internal carotid artery and the cavernous sinus, and, on rare occasions, may appear between the internal carotid or branches of the external carotid artery and the venous plexus of the skull. Traumatic CCF can lead to blindness as the disorder progresses and, in rare cases, can result in paralysis, unconsciousness, and even death. It is important that clinicians operating on the craniofacial region, and especially those who manage craniofacial trauma, have a thorough understanding of this potentially lethal entity. Although CCF occurs rarely after craniofacial trauma, this disorder is thought to occur relatively frequently in patients with basilar skull fractures. Once there is a suspicion, a prompt evaluation of the arterial vasculature around the cavernous sinus is required. Most commonly, a cerebral angiogram is used to make the diagnosis and, using related techniques, a variety of curative measures (e.g., embolization) can then be enacted. A craniotomy-type modality would be relegated to only the most refractory of cases and would be for cure and not diagnosis. A noncontrasted CT scan would only show posttraumatic bony derangements. Beta-2 transferrin assay could be used if there is an accompaniment of clear rhinorrhea to rule out a craniospinal fluid leak. CCF can be mistaken for other pathologies such as an orbital apex syndrome or even stroke. The latter suspicion may lead to the ordering of a carotid duplex, which would be expected to be normal.
A 33-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after sustaining injuries to the face during a snowmobile collision. Axial CT scan is shown. Which of the following is the most appropriate management?
A ) Ablation of the frontal sinus
B ) Cranialization and reconstruction of the anterior frontal sinus wall
C ) Obliteration of the frontal sinus
D ) Observation with x-ray studies monthly
E ) Reconstruction of the nasofrontal duct and anterior and posterior frontal sinus walls
The correct response is Option B.
A comminuted fracture of the frontal sinus is shown in the CT scan, with significant displacement of fragments involving both the anterior and posterior frontal sinus walls and the region of the nasofrontal duct. The most appropriate treatment is cranialization and reconstruction of the anterior wall to restore normal forehead contour and protect the brain. Cranialization involves removing the posterior frontal sinus wall to make the sinus part of the intracranial space and blocking the nasofrontal duct, typically with bone or a pericranial flap so that sinus mucosa is excluded from the intracranial space. The anterior frontal sinus wall is also reconstructed as part of this procedure to restore normal forehead contour and to protect the brain.
Ablation (or exenteration) involves removing the anterior frontal sinus wall and allowing the skin to collapse in on the posterior wall, if it is intact, or on the dura if the posterior wall requires removal as well (as it would in this scenario). While this may lead to a stable, healed wound in the patient described, it is not the most appropriate management as it would leave the patient with a significant deformity that would be difficult to reconstruct. It would also leave the underlying brain unprotected by bone. Ablation is appropriate only in extreme cases of acute infection that require open drainage and removal of infected bone.
Obliteration of the frontal sinus involves removing the sinus mucosa and burring the bony walls to remove mucosal invaginations, plugging the nasofrontal duct, and filling the sinus cavity with fat, muscle, bone, or alloplasts. A variation of this is osteoneogenesis, where the cavity is not filled but allowed to fill spontaneously with bone or scar over time. This would not be feasible in the patient described because of the extreme comminution and displacement of the posterior wall fracture fragments.
Observation is appropriate for minimally or nondisplaced fractures of the frontal sinus that do not involve the nasofrontal duct or do not acutely obstruct the nasofrontal duct. Regular plain x-ray studies should be obtained for several months afterward to monitor for development of a frontal sinus mucocele, which requires surgical treatment.
Reconstruction involves preserving sinus mucosa and reducing fractures of the nasofrontal duct and sinus walls. There are currently no data to support this technique, and in the patient described it could to lead to mucocele development as the nasofrontal duct became scarred and obstructed postoperatively.
Which of the following best represents the likelihood that a patient with a frontal sinus fracture would have a concurrent intracranial injury?
A) 1%
B) 15%
C) 30%
D) 55%
E) 90%
The correct response is Option D.
In an acute trauma setting, the recognition of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a diagnostic challenge as there are often competing diagnoses that take immediate priority. Furthermore, within this cohort, patients with craniofacial fractures have been shown to be at risk for delayed or missed diagnosis for all degrees of TBI, although with a higher likelihood of missed or delayed diagnosis for mTBI compared with moderate to severe TBI. Previously, it was hypothesized that facial fractures buffered the forces transmitted during blunt head trauma, thereby protecting intracranial structures. This conceptual framework has since been questioned as evidence has mounted that individuals with facial fractures are at increased risk for head injury. The biomechanics resulting in different types of facial fractures and the amount of force required to fracture the different components of the facial bony structure have been well described. The nasal bone has the lowest tolerance for fracture at 25 to 75 lbs, while the frontal bone has the highest tolerance at 800 to 1600 lbs. Recent studies have proposed that craniofacial fractures can serve as clinical markers for brain injury and Mulligan et al. suggest that the prevalence of overall head and cervical spine injuries in the setting of facial fractures is high enough to warrant a change in current protocols. In this context, the prevalence of mTBI and moderate to severe TBI in patients with isolated facial fractures in the National Trauma Databank (NTDB) was evaluated, and further characterized the association of isolated facial fractures with different degrees of TBI in patients with mild, moderate, and severe TBI. Facial fractures can serve as objective clinical markers for the potential presence of mTBI and moderate to severe TBI in trauma patients. As mTBI patients have been shown to benefit from simple, easy-to-administer educational interventions, trauma patients with facial fractures may benefit from automatically receiving education about mTBI and TBI recovery, given the clinically meaningful prevalence of mTBI and TBI in this population. As one moves up the craniofacial skeleton, the forces are transmitted more reliably to the intracranial space. Therefore, a frontal sinus fracture is at extremely high risk (usually a 45 to 65% chance) of having an associated intracranial injury.
A 35-year-old woman sustains blunt trauma to the preauricular region during a field hockey game. Radiographs show a fracture of the condylar neck with medial displacement of the proximal fracture fragment. Which of the following muscles most likely contributes to the fracture displacement?
(A) Buccinator
(B) Lateral pterygoid
(C) Masseter
(D) Medial pterygoid
(E) Temporalis
The correct response is Option B.
In this patient who has a fracture of the condylar neck, displacement of the proximal fracture fragment is most likely caused by the action of the lateral pterygoid muscle. This muscle, which has two heads, is the only muscle that inserts directly on the mandibular condyle, on its anterior portion. The inferior head of the lateral pterygoid muscle arises from the lateral pterygoid plate and inserts into the anterior surface of the neck of the condyle; it acts to open the mandible. The superior head arises from the infratemporal crest, infratemporal surface of the greater wing of the sphenoid bone, and a portion of the squamous part of the temporal bone and inserts into the capsule and articular disk of the TMJ; it contributes to the motion of the articular disk. In patients with condylar fractures, the unopposed force of the lateral pterygoid muscle pulls the condylar head medially.
The buccinator muscle lines the oral cavity and has no attachments within the TMJ. The masseter muscle has its bony attachments at the zygomatic arch and along the inferior border of the lateral portion of the mandibular angle and body. The medial pterygoid muscle arises within the pterygoid fossa and inserts into the medial surface of the mandibular angle and ramus. The temporalis muscle originates at the insertion of the infratemporal fossa of the temporal bone and the coronoid process. This muscle does not attach to the TMJ.
In a patient who has sustained a fracture of the zygomaticomaxillary complex (tripod fracture), accurate reduction of the fracture components is most likely to be accomplished with the use of which of the following anatomic structures?
(A) Inferior orbital rim
(B) Lateral orbital wall
(C) Orbital floor
(D) Zygomatic arch
(E) Zygomaticomaxillary plane
The correct response is Option B.
Appropriate reduction of a fracture of the zygomaticomaxillary complex involves a three-dimensional process. In order to obtain the most accurate reduction, the lateral orbital wall and sphenoid wing should be visualized from inside the orbit. This will allow for visualization of the relatively flat plane of the orbital portion of the zygoma and the relatively flat portion of the sphenoid wing; accurate reduction is obtained when these two areas are aligned completely.
Although the inferior orbital rim, orbital floor, zygomatic arch, and zygomaticomaxillary plane are helpful sites for alignment individually, use of any of the sites as a landmark for accurate fracture reduction can result in significant rotational malalignment at the other sites.
A 24-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after being struck in the face. CT scan of the face shows an orbital blow-out fracture. Which of the following findings is an indication for operative intervention?
(A) Blood in the maxillary sinus
(B) Diplopia on primary gaze
(C) Hypesthesia in the infraorbital nerve distribution
(D) Orbital floor defect greater than 2 cm
(E) Subconjunctival hematoma
The correct response is Option D.
In a patient who has sustained an orbital blow-out fracture, indications for surgical exploration include an orbital floor defect of greater than 2 cm, abnormally low vertical height of the globe, and the presence of other fractures. Operative exploration should be performed in patients who have symptomatic diplopia in association with positive findings on forced duction testing. Patients who have symptoms of extraocular muscle entrapment that do not resolve in one week or indications of muscle entrapment on radiographs obtained one week after surgery should undergo additional exploration.
Diplopia on primary gaze typically improves within the first two weeks after surgery. The presence of blood in the maxillary sinus and hypesthesia in the distribution of the infraorbital nerve is common in patients with minor orbital fractures, and surgical intervention is not required. Likewise, subconjunctival hematoma is not an indication for operative intervention
Which of the following concomitant fractures is most likely to affect the perceived reduction when performing open reduction and internal fixation of a zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture?
A) Anterior maxillary wall comminution with loss of bone.
B) Articular tubercle of the zygomatic arch.
C) Le Fort I fracture.
D) Naso-orbito-ethmoid fracture.
E) Orbital floor blowout fracture.
When surgically reducing a zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture (tripod fracture), the surgeon uses multiple landmarks to confirm adequate reduction. The lateral orbital sidewall is the most reliable landmark as it is a three-dimensional landmark (junction of frontal bone, sphenoid, and zygoma). Other landmarks include the zygomaticofrontal suture, the zygomaticomaxillary lateral buttress, the orbital rim, and the zygomatic arch. Because the orbital rim is easily visualized, surgeons may rely heavily on this landmark for alignment. Sometimes due to orbital swelling or poor visualization, the lateral orbital wall is not easy to assess for adequate reduction of the fracture. If the orbital rim appears to be reduced (well aligned) but the ZMC fracture is not well reduced, then an ipsilateral unreduced naso-orbito-ethmoid (NOE) fracture is the most likely reason. It is important to reduce the NOE fracture before aligning the orbital rim for the ZMC fracture reduction. Postoperative deformity will ensue if the NOE fracture is not reduced and the ZMC is plated in position based on the orbital rim alignment. The deformity will lead to enlarged orbital volume and facial widening, loss of malar projection, and enophthalmos. Proper reduction and initial management are important, as secondary corrections are more difficult and have more morbidity.
Isolated orbital fractures most commonly occur in which of the following bones?
A) Ethmoid.
B) Frontal.
C) Lacrimal.
D) Maxillary.
E) Zygomatic.
Most isolated orbital fractures involve the orbital floor, a majority of which is made up of the maxillary bone. The maxillary bone is quite thin behind the infraorbital rim, and is perforated by the infraorbital nerve passing in a canal below it. Most pure blowout fractures involve the orbital floor. Long-term epidemiologic data regarding the natural history of orbital bone fractures are important for the evaluation of existing preventive measures and for the development of new methods of injury prevention and treatment.











