lecture 8 slides Flashcards
ghosts + cognitive dissonance
- 2 conflicting cognitions
- we try to change something to feel better (rebalance)
- i.e vegetarian eats burger, and justifies it and says they need the iron
social influence
- when one person (the source) does something to get another person (the target) to engage in a certain behaviour
- can result in attitude change
- can result in compliance
- can result in both attitude change and compliance - case of patty hearst
- can result in neither
persuasion
persuasion is defined as “changing the beliefs, attitudes, or behaviours of a target through the use of info or an argument”
-we are persuaded every day
communication-persuasion paradigm
- the source (characteristics of source and how they influence how the target construes the message)
- the message (properties of message can influence persuasion)
- the target (characteristics of target influence how they interpret the message)
- the response
the source
- the credibility of the source (subjective) (expert, likeable, attractive, trustworthy)
- hierarchy of credibility (scientists, politicians, activists, celebrities)
the message
- can be based on fact or emotion
- discrepant message (where message being conveyed is diff from what the target currently believes)
- relationship between the credibility of the source and discrepancy of message
the target
-factors that may impact whether the target is persuaded (intelligence, degree of involvement, personality, degree of focus/ distraction)
complying with threats and promises
- “do as you are told”
- compliance through threat or promise (reward vs punishment)
- magnitude (the greater the magnitude the more you will comply) and credibility (believe that you will actually follow through)
obedience
- recognition of a social system ( we learn to obey authority)
- authority figures (parents, police, …)
authority
- authority must be accepted
- “civil order hinges on obedience…”
- milgram’s experiment (65% went to full voltage)
milgram’s obedience experiment
-created hierarchy in which one person (experimenter) directs another (subject) to engage in actions that hurt a third person (confederate)
-research subject instructed to shock the ‘learner’ (the confederate) when he gives an incorrect answer, with the ‘voltage’ increasing as the learner makes additional errors
FINDINGS
-65% continued to the end of the shock series (450 volts)
-not a single participant stopped prior to 300 volts
-many participants became distressed, pleaded with experimenter
factors that impact obedience
- outward sign of authority
- backing up threat of punishment
- where you are in the chain of command
resistance
-not just passive actors (we are active agents in our lives/ social worlds)
forms of resistance
inoculation
-exposure to weak discrepant info as well as counter arguments supported by target
forewarning
-warning target prior to act of persuasion
reactance
- boomerang effect
- when persuasion goes too far, target reacts forcefully