HM case study Flashcards

1
Q

what surgery did HM get ?

A

brain surgery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what year and age did HM get surgery ?

A

age 27
1953

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

why did HM get brain surgery ?

A

to alleviate his symptoms of epilepsy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what part of the brain was removed in HMs surgery ?

A

the hippocampus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was HM diagnosed with after his surgery ?

A

anterograde amnesia
retrograde amnesia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is anterograde amnesia ?

A

when the brain can’t store new information in the short term memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is retrograde amnesia ?

A

the loss of memory for events which happened before the injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

after his surgery HMs STM was normal but whay couldn’t he transfer new memory to ?

A

Long term memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

HM had no knowledge of current affairs or recent family events, give an example of a recent family event that HM struggled to recall

A

his fathers death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what could HM remember after his surgery ?

A

people he knew from a long time ago

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

HM was soon assessed on his recall of salient personal events - what could he recall and what couldn’t he recall ?

A
  • he could barely recall his fathers death
  • he had no memory of his workplace
  • he could draw a floor plan of his house
  • he had no awareness of national or international events
  • he could identify Kennedy when shown a dollar and recalled that he was assassinated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what did HMs neurological experiment assess ?

A

any changes, and coordination and motor impairment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was discovered about HMs IQ before and after his brain surgery ?

A

his IQ had increased from 104 to 112!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what tasks did HM have to complete during his neurological experiment ?

A
  • sorting tasks, e.g wisconsin card sorting tasks
  • perceptual tasks e.g mooney face perception task
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was the mooney face perception task ?

A

involves recognizing a face from black and white pattern with incomplete contour

participants have to give the sex and approximate age of the face

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how did HM perform in the mooney face perception task ?

A

he performed better compared to 8 normal controls of the same age

17
Q

when did HM die ?

A

December 2008

18
Q

who studies HM for 5 decades ?

A

Brenda Milner

19
Q

before HM, where were memory functions thought to be distributed ?

A

in the cortex

20
Q

after research with HM where was memory shown to be distinct in ?

A

a distinct cerebral function to the other cognitive abilities

the medial lobe is important for memory

21
Q

what is a case study

A

In-depth study on individual or small group of people​

Unique/rare​

Usually collects qualitative data: methods used involve questionnaires, interviews​

Triangulation of data used to compare common themes​

Can collect quantitative data through expts and brain scans

22
Q

Case studies - evaluation

A

Suitable/ethical​

Over time = valid patterns of development ​

Triangulation/in-depth and detailed = valid (also naturally occurring = ecological valid)​

Can’t infer cause and effects = low validity​

Low in generalizability because unique cases​

Can’t replicate- not reliable​

Subjective if only one researcher - qual data- could mean different people interpret the data differently.​

Case studies of brain damage can be similar, with similar findings = reliable​

Scans are objective but brain injury can be complex and scans vague – low validity​

Consent needed/ invasive/ right to withdraw/pseudonym