Group Processes And Performance Flashcards

1
Q

Definition of group

A

A group is 2 or more individuals in face to face interaction each aware of his or her membership in the group each aware of the others who belong to the group and each aware of their positive interdependence as they strive to achieve mutual goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of group

A

Intimacy groups
Task groups
social categories
Loos associations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Zajoncs Drive Theory

A

Presence of others, arousal, increase in performing dominant responses, social facilitation, social inhibition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

If correct

A

Social facilitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

If Incorrect

A

Social inhibition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Social facilitation Early Work

A

Triplett cyclists
Performances faster when paced compared with being alone
In competition compared with being paced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Allport’s more generalised affect:

A

Mere presence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mere presence:

A

Entirely passive and unresponsive audience that is only physically present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mere presence:

A

Improvement in performance due to mere presence of conspecifics as coactors or passive audience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Social facilitation focuses on research on

A

Animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

However Research also showed that

A

Social presence = social inhibition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Social presence = social inhibition

A

An improvement in performance of well learnt / east tasks and deterioration in performance of poorly learnt / difficult tasks in mere presence of members of same species

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dominant response:

A

What is typically done in that situation e.g. A well learnt / habitual response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If the dominant response is correct then performance will be

A

Facilitated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If the dominant response is incorrect then performance will be

A

Inhibited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cottrell evaluation apprehension theory

A

We learn about social reward / punishment contingencies (approval / disapproval) based on others evaluation
Perception of an evaluating audience creates arousal not mere presence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Social facilitation is an acquired effect based on

A

Perceived evaluation of others

18
Q

Cottrell supported evaluation apprehension with 3 conditions

A

Blindfolded
Merely present ( passive and uninterested )
Attentive audience

19
Q

Research against evaluation apprehension

20
Q

Distraction- conflict theory

A

Presence of audience / co-actors, attentional conflict, increase arousal/ drive, social facilitation effects

21
Q

DCT strengths

A
General distraction ( noise movement) 
Can explain performance facilitation / inhibition in animal research
22
Q

The Ringelmann effect

A

Men pulling on a rope attached to a dynamometer exerted less force in proportion to the number of people in group

23
Q

Reasons for ringelmann effect

A

Coordination loss

Motivation loss

24
Q

Coordination Loss:

A

As group size inhibits movement, distraction jostling

25
Motivation loss:
Participants did not try as hard, less motivated
26
Social loafing:
Reduction in individual effort when working on a collective task compared with working either alone or coactively
27
Ingham et al
Investigated social loafing with real groups and pseudo groups pulling on a rope
28
Real group:
Groups of varying size
29
Pseudo group:
Only one true participant, rest were confederates who did not pull at all
30
Latane supported social loafing through:
Clapping, shouting and cheering tasks
31
Reduced amount of cheering / clapping notice made per person reduced by:
29% in 2 person groups 49% in 4 person groups 60% in 6 person groups
32
Why do people loaf? Green:
Output equity evaluation apprehension Matching to standard
33
Social compensation:
Increased effort on collective task when task is important to compensate for anticipated loafing by others
34
Types of group decision making:
Brainstorming Group polarisation Groupthink
35
Brainstorming:
Uninhibited generation of as many ideas as possible in a group in order to enhance group creativity
36
Features within brainstorming
Social loafing Evaluation apprehension Production blocking
37
Group polarisation:
Tendency for group discussion to produce more extreme group decisions that the mean of members' pre discussion opinions in the direction favourited by the mean
38
Group polarisation features:
Persuasive arguments | Social comparison / cultural values
39
Groupthink
Janis: a mode of thinking in highly cohesive groups in which the desire to reach unanimous agreement overrides the motivation to adopt rational decision making procedures
40
Groupthink is also the
Group cohesiveness principle cause