foreign policy timeline Flashcards

1
Q

when was the September Programme?

A

1914

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what was the September Programme?

A

memorandum which outlined the territorial changes that Germany hoped to bring about during WW1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what does the September Programme suggest about Nazi FP?

A

it was an example of existing FP which was carried forward in Nazi foreign policy

the need for EXPANSION into Europe
example of Weltpolitik

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

was the September Programme an example of structuralist or intentionalist?

A

structuralist

Hitler CARRIED FORWARD this policy in his own policy
it was an example of continuation with an expansionist FP being adopted in Nazi FP as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

when was the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk?

A

1918

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk?

A

ended Russian involvement in WW1

outlined VERY harsh terms in terms of land given to the Germans

Russia lost 30% of land to Germany

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does the Brest-Litovsk suggest about Nazi FP?

A

to be found out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

when was the Treaty of Rapallo?

A

1922

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the Treaty of Rapallo?

A

a treaty between the USSR and Weimar Germany which established friendly terms between the two nations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

why was the Treaty of Rapallo significant for Nazi FP?

A

the Treaty of Rapallo was used by Weimar Germany to re-establish diplomatic ties with the USSR to resolve any differences

can be seen as similar to the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939 but both had differing connotations

the Nazi-Soviet pact can be seen as a part of a Hitler plan for world war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

was the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk an example of structuralist or intentionalist?

A

to be found out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

was the Treaty of Rapallo an example of structuralist or intentionalist?

A

to be found out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

when were the Locarno Treaties?

A

1925

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what were the Locarno Treaties?

A

agreements between the western powers and Germany on Germany’s WESTERN BORDERS

ended the demilitarisation of the Rheinland
agreement to uphold PEACE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did the Locarno Treaties suggest about Nazi FP?

A

Hitler in his early years of FP was trying to appease the Western powers and promoting peace

this was very similar to Stresemann’s reasons for the treaties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

were the Locarno Treaties an example of structuralist or intentionalist?

A

STRUCTURALIST

were used to show German cooperation with allied demands

Hitler used the same methods to show that he was cooperating with the Western powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

when was Hitler’s meeting with the generals?

A

February 1933

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what was Hitler’s meeting with the generals?

A

he outlined his plan to eliminate the SA in favour of the German Army

the reason for the Night of the Long Knives
- Army helped out here

stressed the importance of building up the armed forces (for war???)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what does Hitler’s meeting with the generals suggest about Nazi foreign policy?

A

suggests that he had planned for war right after becoming chancellor in January 1933

showed that he had a timeline in which the German army was to be rearmed and prepared for war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

was Hitler’s meeting with the generals an example of structuralist or intentionalist?

A

INTENTIONALIST

Hitler had clearly outlined his plan for the building up of the armed forces

was later reaffirmed by the Night of the Long Knives where Hitler had guaranteed the support of the German Army, something which he know would be important in his FP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

when did German withdraw from the League of Nations?

A

October 1933

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what did Germany’s withdrawal from the League of Nations suggest about Nazi FP?

A

suggests that Hitler had no ambitions to maintain and uphold peace, as well as be policed by the Western nations

he saw the LoN as weak with it’s dealings with other foreign powers, so he decided to leave to allow him to adopt his expansionist FP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

was Germany’s withdrawal from the LoN an example of structuralist or intentionalist?

A

INTENTIONALIST

showed Hitler pushing Germany towards war

had no intention to be stopped by the Western Powers or even help stop other Western Powers

he saw the expansionist attitudes of Italy and Japan as reasons why the LoN would fail in stopping his own FP ambititions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

when was the non-aggression pact signed with Poland?

A

January 1934

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

what did the signing of the non-aggression pact with Poland suggest about Nazi FP?

A

there was a clear plan involved

Hitler did not want to fight a war with the USSR so early so he wanted a buffer between the two nations: Poland was that buffer

he also hoped that Poland would help him with dealing with the USSR, something which he had miscalculated

26
Q

was the Nazi-Polish non-aggression pact an example of structuralist or intentionalist?

A

INTENTIONALIST/STRUCTURALIST

27
Q

how was the Nazi-Polish non-aggression pact structuralist?

A

Hitler had REACTED to the threat of the USSR by signing a pact with Poland to protect Nazi-Germany

28
Q

how was the Nazi-Polish non-aggression pact intentionalist?

A

Hitler needed peacetime in order to be able to rearm effectively
therefore it can be seen that Hitler’s ultimate plan with the non-aggression pact was to ensure peace in Eastern Europe with the USSR unable to be able to attack Germany
thus allowing Germany to rearm

29
Q

when did Austria undergo destabilisation?

A

a

30
Q

was the austrian destabilisation example of structuralist or intentionalist?

A
31
Q

when was conscription and rearmament proposed in Nazi Germany?

A

March 1935

32
Q

what did rearmament and conscription suggest about Nazi FP?

A

suggested that the Nazis were pursuing war
- both with the expansion of the German army
and
- with the establishment of an economy capable of war

33
Q

was the rearmament and conscription an example of structuralist or intentionalist?

A

INTENTIONALIST and STRUCTURALIST

34
Q

how was rearmament and conscription intentionalist?

A

showed Hitler had intentions to prepare for a large scale war of expansion

little reason why he would not pursue war with a more expanded Army

tanks built for land warfare in the East
submarines and battleships for the naval war in the West

35
Q

how was rearmament and conscription structuralist?

A

most other European nations had been making major reforms to their armies

Hitler can also be seen to be reacting to the threats from the East with Poland and the USSR being active in expansion

rearming the military can also be seen as a defensive action

36
Q

when was the Anglo-German Naval agreement?

A

June 1935

37
Q

what was the Anglo-German Naval agreement?

A

agreed that the German Krigsmarine was to be 35% of the size of the Royal Navy

38
Q

what was the significance of the Anglo-German Naval agreement on Nazi FP?

A

Germany believed that it would start an Anglo-German alliance (something which was pursued for racial reasons) which would be against France and the USSR

it had allowed the Kriegsmarine to expand beyond the remit of the TofV and thus allow Germany to further rearm it’s armed forces

39
Q

was the signing of the Anglo-German Naval agreement an example of structuralist or intentionalist?

A

STRUCTALIST and INTENTIONALIST

40
Q

how was the Anglo-German Naval agreement intentionalist?

A

Hitler had pursued an agreement with Britain which allowed Germany to further rearm
this allowed the Kriegsmarine to be more prepared for a war…idea of building up to a mass scale war

41
Q

how was the Anglo-German Naval agreement intentionalist?

A

the agreement allowed for the Kriegsmarine to expand

building up to a potential war in Europe where sea power will be needed

shows Hitler having a plan for rearmament and thus a war

42
Q

when was the Rome-Berlin Axis?

A

November 1936

43
Q

what was the Rome-Berlin Axis?

A

a coalition between Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy

44
Q

why was the Rome-Berlin Axis significant?

A

aligned Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy and would later lead to the Pact of Steel

45
Q

when was the Anti-Comintern Pact with Japan?

A

1937

46
Q

what was the Anti-Comintern Pact with Japan?

A

the formation of an alliance between Nazi Germany and Japan against the USSR
was seen by the Nazis as a litmus test of loyalty for future allies

47
Q

why was the Anti-Comintern Pact significant for Nazi FP?

A

it gave the Nazis an ally against the USSR in the east (the USSR would have to fight a war on two fronts)

it also gave the Nazis an ally against the USA with Japan being in closer proximity to the Western coast

48
Q

was the signing of the Anti-Comintern Pact intentionalist or structuralist?

A

INTENTIONALIST

Hitler clearly had a plan for support in a war against the USSR
the Anti-Comintern Pact was in direct opposition to the Cominterm association of communist powers

Communism and Bolshevism as a whole were ideologies which Hitler and the Nazi Party massively opposed

49
Q

when was the Hossbach Conference?

A

1937

50
Q

what was significant of the Hossbach Conference?

A

outlined Hitler’s FP and his aims of expansion
start of Hitler’s radical FP
showed Hitler’s desire to expand and fight small wars of plunder in order to allow the German economy to recover
BUT
can be seen to be pure daydreaming
- policy was never fully carried out

51
Q

was the Hossbach Conference an example of structuralist or intentionalist?

A

INTENTIONALIST and STRUCTURALIST

52
Q

how was the Hossbach Conference intentionalist?

A

showed clear plans set out by Hitler to start a general European war by expansion
a long term master plan done to inform his generals

53
Q

how was the Hossbach Conference structuralist?

A

can be seen to be ad hoc
can be seen to be simply Hitler’s response to the growing economic crisis in Germany to appease the conservatives

54
Q

when was the Blomberg-Fritsch affair?

A

1938

55
Q

what was significant of the Blomberg-Fritsch affair?

A

showed Hitler’s intention of merging party and state by removing most of the original German officers from office

replaced with Keitel and his OKW which was seen more in line with Nazi policy

Hitler did not want officers who did not agree with his aggressive expansion

confirmed Hitler’s desire for expansion using military force

used to reorganise the German Army

56
Q

was the Blomberg-Fritsch affair an example of structuralist or intentionalist?

A

INTENTIONALIST

Hitler clearly wanted leaders who would stick to his plans

Hitler clearly demanded a war of expansion and the dis-satisfaction of two leading generals in the German army being dismissed

he reorganised the German Army to be more in line with his ambitions of expansion

57
Q

when was Anschluss?

A

March 1938

58
Q

why was Anschluss significant?

A

had shown that Britain and France had failed to stand up to Hitler
Mussolini prioritised German friendship over the need of a buffer state (unlike in 1934)

Hitler had now encircled Czechoslovakia

59
Q

was Anschluss intentionalist or structuralist?

A

intentionalist and structuralist

60
Q

how was Anscluss intentionalist?

A

Hitler had planned for a while for Anschluss to happen (attempt in 1934)
Hitler had pushed Nazi FP to appease to Austria for better relations
was also against the TofV suggesting a planned proposal

61
Q

how was Anscluss structuralist?

A

Hitler only invaded Austria when the government pleaded for help