Ch 60 Femur fracture Flashcards
femure fractures
- 20% to 25% of all fractures encountered in the dog and cat
- Young animals are significantly overrepresented
- involving the proximal and distal physes occur most commonly in immature animals
- most closed likely because of the protective effects of the large thigh musculature
- historically porgnosis guarded > likely due to older tehcniques, less biological approach, inappropriate implants
- prognosis dependent on fracture severity, articular involvement, soft tissue trauma, and concurrent injury.
- reported to be the most common affected by osteomyelitis and nonunion
- frequently associated with severe trauma > assess for shock and injuries involving the thoracic or abdominal cavity
biological osteosynthesis stresses the importance of reducing iatrogenic trauma to the fracture site through less precise fracture reconstruction (except for articular fractures) and less rigid fixation.
- Its effect is optimization of biologic potential, which encourages early formation of callus with rapid secondary bone healing.
- In parallel, implant evolution has included improvements in plate and interlocking nail technology to provide greater strength, as well as better preservation of blood supply.
Describe the AO fracture classification system
Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen
Each bone has a number (femur = 3)
Second number denoted relative position of the fracture within the bone
- 1 = proximal
- 2 = shaft
- 3 = distal
Described with respect to its morphology
- A = Single fracture
- B = Wedge or butterfly
- C = Complex
Final number corresponding to severity and prognosis
- 1 = good to excellent
- 2 = moderate severity, guarded to good prognosis
- 3 = severe, guarded to poor prognosis
femur is composed of three separate regions?
(1) The proximal region
- head
- neck,
- trochanters
- trochanteric fossa
(2) the diaphysis is the elongated, cylindrical region of cortical bone, bordered by the proximal and distal metaphyses
(3) the distal region
- distal metaphysis or supracondylar
- trochlea
- condyles
- intercondylar fossa.
What are the main forms of proximal intracapsular fractures? (4)
- epiphyseal
- physeal
- subcapital
- transcervical
What are the main forms of proximal Extracapsular fractures? (3)
- basilar neck
- intertrochanteric
- subtrochanteric
Fractures of the distal region of the femur (3)
- supracondylar (metaphyseal fractures)
- physeal
- condylar and intercondylar (epiphyseal fractures)»_space; bi or unicondylar
muscle pull from the gastrocnemius, semitendinosus, and semimembranosus muscles results in caudal displacement of the distal fracture segment
Radiographic Assessment of the Femur
- Orthogonal radiographs
- A magnification marker is required due to magnification
- standard VD: femoral axis inclination is in excess of 35 degrees to the radiology table, which causes distortion of the entire femur (shortening)
- craniocaudal radiograph: via an extended ventrodorsal or horizontal beam projection
- semi-flexed position (“frog-leg”) beneficial for assessing the proximal region of the femur
- Adequacy of positioning by referencing the femoral trochlear ridges and intercondylar fossa rather than using the fabellae position, which is inconsistent between patients
- Given the limitations of rads, more detailed imaging via (CT) should be considered
Anatomy of the Femoral Head and Neck
- covered with hyaline cartilage, except over the fovea capitis,
- lateralization of femur provides hip joint with a greater ROM, but generates large bending stresses > The trabecular network is naturally oriented to withstand these forces
- reinforced cranially by an osseous ridge that extends from the base of the femoral head to the greater trochanter
- head and the proximal portion of the neck are within the capsule of the hip joint
- anatomic relationship between the femoral head and the diaphysis is characterized by the angles of inclination and anteversion
Where is the highest strain density observed in the femoral neck?
Most medial and distal portion
What is the normal angle of inclination?
130 - 145 degrees
in the frontal plane
What is the normal angle of anteversion?
27 - 32 degrees
in the transverse plane
Anatomy of the Trochanters and Trochanteric Fossa
- proximal femur contains three protuberances: greater, lesser and third
- trochanteric fossa: attachment site of internal and external obturator muscles and the gemelli muscle.
- The capital physis is L-shaped, which provides intrinsic resistance to shear and rotational forces
What muscles attach to the greater trochanter?
the lesser trochanter?
the third trochanter?
greater:
- Middle gluteal
- deep gluteal
- Piriformis muscles
Lesser:
- Iliopsoas
Third:
- superficial gluteal muscle
What muscle attach at the intertrochanteric fossa?
Internal and external obturator
Gemelli
What are the three subdivision of the proximal blood supply?
What does each subdivision include?
Extraosseous
- lateral and medial circumflex femoral arteries
- caudal and cranial gluteal arteries
- iliolumbar artery
- gluteal and circumflex arteries anastomose to form vascular ring at base of femoral neck
- medial circumflex branches to give nutrient a.
Intracapsular
- Arise from vascular ring, penetrate joint capsule at distal attachment and course subsynovially along craniodistal femoral neck
- Anastomose near capital physis to form intracapsule vascular ring
- Branches off ring penetrate the physis and give rise to intraosseous arcuate network
Intraosseous
- Branches of caudal gluteal and medial circumflex penetrate the floor of the trochanteric fossa and create intraosseous network
In dogs, the artery of the ligament of the head of the femur does NOT contribute to epiphyseal blood supply. This is in contrast to the cat
Disruption of vascular network may account for complications such as:
(1) abnormal development of the femoral head and neck,
(2) femoral head and neck resorption
(3) degenerative joint disease
all arteries of the intracapsular and intraosseous networks propagate from the extraosseous vessels > blood supply highly susceptible to vascular insult
How much of the femoral longitudinal growth is from the femoral capital physis and the trochanteric physis?
At what age do they close?
- Capital physis 25%
- Trochanteric physis 0% (involved more with shape)
- Closure in dogs begins at 6 months, complete 9-12m
- Closure in cats 7-10m
proximal physis normal and fracture
Open Approaches to the Proximal Region of the Femur
- the craniolateral approach
- the dorsal approach via osteotomy of the greater trochanter (Gorman approach),
- the dorsal approach via tenotomy of the gluteal muscles - only in immature animals
Gentle tissue-handling skills and preservation of the vasculature must be applied > trauma to gluteal or circumflex vessles supplying the extracapsular vascular ring
Minimally Invasive Approach to the Proximal Region of the Femur
reduce iatrogenic injury to articular surface and the vascular network of the proximal end of the femur
- requires the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy > ideally standard sized c-arm
- disadvantages of mini C-arms are the inability to provide high-quality images in larger patients and diminished clearance
- minimize personnel exposure to levels as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)
Stabilization of Fractures of the Proximal Region of the Femur
- account for approximately 25% of all fractures
- conservative management is not considered a suitable option, and early surgical intervention is recommended
- Surgical options broadly categorized as primary repair or salvage procedures.
- Primary repair = gold standard, associated with good functional recovery and limited risk for complications.
- conversion to a salvage procedure can be performed > THR or FHNE
- animal’s age, duration between the inciting trauma and treatment, and fracture location
- Prognosis varies from guarded to excellent
- preexisting OA contraindication for primary repair
(5) unique biologic and mechanical features of proximal femoral fractures which can make it challenging
- Concurrent trauma to fragile vascular network
- Residual growth potential of capital physis
- Eccentric loading of femoral head
- limited bone stock for stabilisation
- potential articular surface involvement
Fractures of the Capital Epiphysis
- associated with Coxa plana (flattening of the femoral head epiphysis) and luxation
- Ventral approach: Avoids requirement to transect ligament of the head of the femur which can contribute to instability
- Smaller fragments not amenable to fixation are excised
- large fragment, stabilization with Kirschner wires, small-diameter screws in lag fashion
- a minimum of two implants should be used to resist rotational forces,
- implants must be countersunk
- prevention of postoperative luxation often required: prosthetic joint capsule or an iliotrochanteric band, toggle if ligament gone.
- immature animals: lagged screw(s), associated with premature physeal closure, resorption of the femoral neck, and degenerative changes
Fractures of the Capital Physis
- Salter-Harris type I fractures most common
- Salter-Harris type II fractures often present with femoral head luxation with the epiphyseal fragment remaining attached to the ligament
- Type III and type IV fracture are reportedly more challenging to diagnose and repair
- delay in reduction and stabilization allows for ongoing trauma to vasculature and physeal surfaces.
- Reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the capital physis can be achieved using an open or closed approach (iatrogenic trauma to the vascular network is minimized)
- pins/wire to prevent compression and iatrogenic closure of the physis
- presumed, however, that regardless of the implant, the physis may close as a result of the inciting or surgical trauma
How often is concurrent seperation of the trochanteric physis seen with capital physeal fractures?
11 - 15%
What sized K-wires are appropriate for cats and most small-medium dogs?
How many should be placed?
In what orientation?
- 0.7 - 1.6mm diameter
- minimim of 2 pins, no more than 3
- Pin should be parallel to each other (allows continued growth of physis, allows forces to be distributed equally between pins, normal loading of growth plate and dynamic compression of the fracture)
- 2 pins shown to be as strong as intach femoral neck in one study (weaker in another).
- Addition of a third pin increases strength by 29%
- Pins can be placed normograde or retrograde. Normograde, distal-to-proximal direction, is the least invasive
- facilitated by the use of a C-shaped drill guide (which may be quite traumatic to place)
- Only after anatomic reduction is achieved are the pins advanced and secured within the proximal segment.
- insertion point is located caudal and distal to the greater trochanter within the subtrochanteric region
resist shear and rotational forces
Fluoroscopically guided placement
- pins should be advanced as deeply as possible within epiphysis, However, if extend through cartilage > OA
- hemispheric contour creates a challenge for accurate pin position
- Fluoroscopy ideal because it allows to verify pins embedded within the subchondral bone
- CARE: tip of a fixation pin could appear safely embedded on a single 2D fluoroscopic view
- avoid iatrogenic articular lesions, pin placement should be verified on no fewer than two fluoroscopic projections
- surgeon remain attentive to the haptic feedback while gently and slowly advancing the pin(s
What structures can be used to guide epiphyseal femoral head pin placement?
- epiphyseal thickness can be estimated with the use of standard radiographs
- Pins located within the center of the epiphysis can be safetly advanced a distance equal to 75-80% of the contralateral epiphysis or width of the pubic bone
- Eccentrically placed should only be advanced to 65%
alternatively, one may purposely advance the pins until they can be seen or palpated at the articular cartilage with a blunt instrument
complications
dysplasia, osteoarthritis, or the “apple core”
salvage for physis #
FHNE
- profound changes in proximal femoral anatomy and subsequent loss of function may occur with femoral head and neck excision in young animals
- altered weight bearing, disuse muscle atrophy, lameness after exercise, and ankylosis.
- Early and aggressive postoperative rehabilitation is required
THR
- posible with cementless
- however, concerns regarding the size of the implant used, with respect to the animal’s size at skeletal maturity, have arisen
What percentage of dogs are reported to have a moderate to poor outcome after a FHO?
20%
Capital Physeal Dysplasia
- definitive cause remains unknown
- early neutering has been shown to delay physeal closure and is potentially related to physeal dysplasia
- unilateral and bilateral
- Histopathology in cats: intact epiphysis with an unusually wide physis containing irregular clusters of chondrocytes in an abundant extracellular matrix and necrotic cartilage at the cleavage site
Tx
- fixation using a screw in lag fashion (growth is complete).
- To limit any loss in reduction as the screw engages the epiphysis, an antirotational Kirschner wire can be placed
- MIO with fluoro
- salvage: FHNE or THR
What is capital physeal dysplasia?
What animals are overrepresented?
- Spontaneous seperation of the capital physis in animals after timely physeal closure
- Young, overweight, castrated-males cats overrepresented
Fractures of the femoral neck
- common in dogs and cats younger than 1 year of age.
- intracapsular (subcapital or transcervical) or extracapsular (basilar)
- closed and open reduction
- difficult to treat > lack of intrinsic stability and the presence of substantial bending moments
- Kirschner wires, small-diameter Steinmann pins, and bone screws
- multiple pins recommended in immature patients to prevent premature physeal closure
- mature patient: fixation with a screw in lag fashion was significantly stronger and provided greater interfragmentary compression compared to multiple pinning techniques > beneficial in large- and giant-breed dogs.
What fracture plane minimised shear stresses of femoral neck fractures?
30 degrees or less to the transverse place
greater shear forces are associated with a greater incidence of implant failure and nonunion
Fractures of the Greater Trochanter
- typically Salter-Harris type I fractures that occur as avulsion fractures in immature animals
- frequently occur with ipsilateral fracture of the capital physis or neck
- considerably displaced, conservative treatment is not recommended because malunion and altered development of the proximal femur may result
- all pins and screws are placed perpendicular to the physis and parallel to each other
- premature closure of the trochanteric physis is likely > not affect the longitudinal length, changes in conformation of the proximal region may alter hip joint biomechanics and predispose these dogs to DJD
What are the repair options of fractures of the greater trochanter?
What are the potential results of premature trochanteric physeal closure?
Repair
- Conservative if minimally displaced
- Pins and tension band
Results in early physeal closure
- 5 deg increase in both inclination and anteversion
Subtrochanteric Fractures
- proximal metaphysis and that are distal to the trochanters
- Reduction via combined craniolateral approach to the hip and lateral approach to the diaphysis
- ORIF but with principles of biologic osteosynthesis applied when possible.
- bone plating typical (+/- IM pin for bending forces)
- due to the limited bone stock available proximally, ILN may be more effective (contraindicated if concurrent transcervical fracture present)
- ILN: bolts should be directed slightly caudolateral-to-craniomedial direction, parallel to the femoral neck, increase bone stock and avoid fossa
- Precise contouring and positioning of the plate over the lateral aspect of the greater trochanter is important
- transcervical screw optimize the stability of the proximal fragment
- Tied-in ESF has increased morbidity > predisposing the animal to contracture of the quadriceps
angle stable ILN better resists bending
What is essential in providing stability of the proximal fragment of a subtrochanteric fracture when using a bone plate?
Transcervical screw
What is the reported rate of femoral neck resorption after open reduction and internal fixation?
What thought to be responsible for this complication? (2)
apple core
Up to 70% within 3-6 weeks
Disruption of the vascular network and overfixation, resulting in vascular disruption and stress protection
Subsequent collapse is rare
Why are pins for femoral neck/capital physeal fractures recommended to be removed? (4)
- Allows remodelling and more complete healing
- Decreased interference with residual growth
- Eases revision options if sevre OA develops
- May help to reduce the risk of neck resorption
advantages of MIO of femoral neck #?
- limited soft tissue trauma
- optimal preservation of blood supply
- promote rapid healing (2 and 3 weeks after surgery)
- resorption and segmental collapse of the femoral neck is not reported
- NOT eliminate risk of proximal femoral dysplasia and secondary osteoarthritis
common error is to initiate insertion of pins too far proximally on the craniolateral femoral cortex
post-op and outcomes
post-op
- ensure appropriate alignment and implant placement with rads
- activity restriction, including cage confinement, may be required until clinical union
- physical rehabilitation, particularly in immature animals, should be implemented as early as tolerated
outcome
- following internal fixation reported to be good to excellent in multiple retrospective studies
- depending on several factors: The animal’s age (if physis affected), Preexisting hip dysplasia, severity of the inciting trauma, articular causes OA (which may require future intervension)
- type of open surgical approach used nor the duration between the time of injury and the time of primary fixation shown to be significantly associated with prognosis
- (MIO) compared with open approaches: unknown benefit, technically challenging
salvage procedures
- indications: (1) preexisting hip dysplasia/OA (2) highly comminuted fractures (3) chronic fractures (4) when revision is required
- FHNE
- THR (contrindicted: infection)