Ch 32 Thoracolumbar Vertebral column Flashcards
TL IVD anatomy
AF
NP
Cartilage
- AF: concentric lamellae of collagen. offers biomech support and all multidurectional movement
- nucleus pulposus: remnant from notocord+ chrondrocyte like cells. hydrated, contains glycoaminoglycans (chondroiton, keratan) + Type IV collagen
- cartilage ends provide nutrients
longitissimus lumbrum (T11-L7) attaches accessory process
spinal n/vessels lie ventral and cranial to tendon
accessory process ~ level with ventral canal
What ligaments help to provide stability to the vertebral column?
Three long ligaments:
- Dorsal and ventral longitudinal ligaments
- Supraspinous ligament
Three short ligaments:
- interspinous
- intertransverse
- yellow ligaments
Intercapital ligaments (T2-T11)
spinal biomechnics
what forces does IVD resist? body? joint?
passive stability?
which sites ost common?
- IVD provides majority of biomech stability, espicially for rotational and bending forces
- joint: all forces
- vertebral body: butress
- passive: zygopophyseal joint, muscle tendons, IVD, ligaments
- intercapital lig prob wh reduce disc protusion cranial to T11
- disruption of IVD and articular joint alters biomechnics, worsened by double hemilam and lareh breed.
- ## 50% IVDD @ T12/13 and T13/L1
Surgery IVDD
indications
timing (4)
aims
for decompression in apporptiate cases (based on neurolocalisation and predicted pathology)
folowing aporoptiate imaging for sxp planning
validated nuero score allow for improtant prognostic evluation (disucss order of loss…)
timing of sx: may mitigate ongoing injury due to compression, however this is contraversial and conflicting evidence in litaerature
1. acute, rapid and severe may benefit asap (bagley 2005)
2. increased PMM rate if delay (casel 2019)
3. no benefit within 24hr (upchurch 2020)
4. 5% may benefit from progression (Martin 2020)
aims: minimase bone removal to reduce instability
intuitive sooner rather than later
What muscles are encountered in a dorsal approach to the cranial thoracic spine (T1-T5) which are not encountered more caudally?
Trapezius
Rhomboideus
Splenius (cranially)
Serratus dorsalis (caudally)
Where does the nuchal ligament attach?
Spinous processes of T1 and T2
What are the main epaxial muscles encounted on a dorsal approach to the TL spine?
Multifidus
Longissimus lumborum
What epaxial muscles are encountered on a lateral approach to the TL spine?
Serratus dorsalis caudalis
Longissimus lumborum
iliocostalis lumborum
Which muscles are seperated to allow a dorsolateral approach to the TL spine?
Multifidus and longissimus lumborum
What are the anatomic landmarks of a hemilam window?
What parts of the vertebral canal does it allow access to?
Landmarks:
- Ventral accessory process
- Base of spinous process
- Base of articular processes cranially and caudally
Access to ventral, dorsal and lateral canal
What is a pediculectomy and mini-hemilam?
use xsectional imaging to dictate approptiate laminectomy sx
Pediculectomy - Removes the pedicle over the body of 1 vertebra, leaving the zygapophyseal joint intact
Mini-hemilam - combined pediculectomy over contingous vertebrae
Faster and pediculectomy avoids the spinal nerve, artery and vein. Decreased exposure
possibly increased risk of disc left behind (huska 2014)
endoscopic assissted
druid 2019
MI, thus redcued soft tissue damage
equal/preferred in humans (reduced haemorrhage, faster, reduce complciations, better reovery)
cadaver study in canine
What are the three forms for dorsal laminectomy?
alternative to bilateral hemi
Funkquist A - Removal of spinous process, laminae, articular processes and approx half of the dorsal portion of the pedicles
Funkquist B - Leaves the articular processes and pedicles intact
Modified dorsal laminectomy - Removal of spinous process, laminae and caudal articular rpocesses are removed. Medial aspect of pedicles can be undercut to enhance exposure
dorsal, lateral access
What is the accuracy of radigraphs to determine the site of the primary IVDH?
no infor re cord compression
51-61%
vacuum sign specific
What is the sensitivity of myelography in determining the primary site and lateralisation of IVDH?
Site: 74 - 98%
Lateralisation: 55-100%
What prognostic factors can be determined from a myelogram?
Length of intramedullary pattern / length L2 vert ratio on a lateral view:
- Over 5 = 26% chance of recovery
- Less than 5 = 66% chance recovery
Intraparenchymal spinal cord contrast medium - seen in 6/7 dogs with myelomalacia in one study
What is the reported rate of posy-myelographic seizures? What are some risk factors
myelopathy, apnea, arrythmia, menigitis, bleed, death
10-21.4%
Risk factors include cisternal myelogram and large body size
What is the sensitivty of non-contrast CT for detecting the site and side of IVDH?
Site: 84-100%
Side: 79-94%
MRI has significantly higher sensitivity for site (87% vs79%
MRI vs CT
CT allow localisation and planning for majority of cases
> inc sensitivity with typical breed
> <10% require other image (emery 2018)
> myelogram increase sens/sepc
> if not IVDD, then difficult to deterimine dz
> MRI outperforms CT by most measrable charactersistics
MRI pros: see non-mineralised and if severe SCI, provide prognosis
> inc, contrast res thus ST suprerior
> disc ID (protusion, extrusion, ANNPE/HNPE
MRI findings
- Hypointense on T1W and T2W
- Non-degenerative disc can be isointense on T1W and hyperintense on T2W
- loss of CSF and fat signal
- contrast can intensify disc signal
100% seinsitive for location/site
superior to detect non-IVDD
T2W hyperintensity >3x L2 length only 20% recvoer VMF (levine 2009)
degree of compression not associated with outcome (penning 2006)
What sequences can be used on MRI to help identify an inconspicuous IVDH?
- T2* can help to identify haemorrhage
- STIR and FLAIR helpful to identify low volume disc extrusion
- ultrafast, heavily T2W sequence has appearance of a myelogram
- Disc material may enhance with gadolinium contrast
CT findings
- loss of epidural fat opacity
- cord compression
- mineral density within cord
- hyperattenuation = haemorrhage, disc
Tretatment
most studies restrospective, thus limitations > not randomised, diff neuro grading, poor follow up etc
provide useful info, but must be cautious with interpretation
What is the reported success rate of conservative management with IVDH?
82 - 88% ambulatory
43 - 51% non-ambulatory
medical
stratagies (3)
ambulatory vs non
-rest allow AF to heal/scar
-pain relief and antiinflamm
physio to improve muscle mass
studies report good outcomes for ambulatory dogs, difficutl to compare outcomes due to different medical tx
levine 2007
> 80% ambulatory
> 50% recover with no relapse
> 15-20% Tx fail
> 30% recurrence
> nsaid beneficial, CCS equivolcol
in general, for non-ambul:
- longer reocvery and reduce return to functino when compared to Sx
- no DPP, 7% recovery (davies 1983)
- no new advancements in SCI mgmt with evidence-based imrpvoment
What is a lateral corpectomy?
Success of decompression?
Risks?
Creation of a “slot” in the vertebral body, 1/4 the length of the vertebrae
90% successful decompression, deeper slots more successful decompression
Risks: Possible instability and risk of fracture/subluxation
What are the improvement rates after corpectomy?
18.7% immediate impovement
52.8% improvement at discharge
64.2% improvement 4 weeks
91.4% ambulatory at 6 months, 74.5% having a normal gait
durotomy
A randomized trial comparing durotomy and standard
decompression surgery alone would be ideal but
problematic in practice.
olby ACVIM consensus
TIMING
DPN: current literature does not generally demonstrate improved neurologic outcome in deep pain negative dogs with early surgical intervention, often surgery within 24 h
DPN and PMM: one study found (Castel) an association between delay of decompression beyond 12 h and increased risk PMM, but literature overall lacking
SURGERY Emerging evidence > focal or extensive hemilaminectomy and durotomy might decrease the risk PMM in dogs DPN and
may improve survival in dogs with CS of PMM
2 Japanese retrospective studies reported a 91-100% survival rate with extensive hemi and durotomy, though most remained paralysed, including the FL if affected.
Jeffery: 1 prospective study reported a reduced occurrence of PMM following extended durotomy (4 vertebrae) in G5 dogs
AVCIM consensus suggests that extensive hemilaminectomy with durotomy can be considered for dogs with suspected PMM
however, long-term morbidity (such as spinal instability) and how much surgery require further investigation
Effect of durotomy in dogs with thoracolumbar disc
herniation and without deep pain perception in the hind
limbs
Fumitaka Takahashi
retrospective
- increased recovery to ambulate with durotomy
- no DPP, no dogs with durotomy developed PMM
- not prevent progression of PMM
- death 12%
Extended durotomy to treat severe spinal cord injury after
acute thoracolumbar disc herniation in dogs
Nick D. Jeffery
the small sample and the lack
of a control group preclude definitive conclusions regarding
the efficacy of durotomy.
Outcomes of dogs with progressive myelomalacia treated
with hemilaminectomy or with extensive
hemilaminectomy and durotomy
Yuya Nakamoto
durotomy allow insepction of cord and reduce pressure
outcomes
1. normal nociception
most retrospective studies
-most reliable indiciator of prgnosis
- 72-100% recovery (volunrary ambulate and uirnate)
- excellent if ambul
- increased sevrerity ~ increased recovery time
- >90% nonambulatory will reover within 3 months if DPP present (most within 4 weeks) Davies 2022
- mean time to walk 14d
2.absent nociception
no test 100% predictive
-ensure conscious
- 43-69% return to ambulate with Sx (Aikawaw 2012, Ruddle 2006)
- if no pain in 2 weeks, prognosis poorer
- recovery time 5-10 week
- MRI lesion prgnostic (5x >L2 Ito 2005, levine 2009)
3, timing
contraversial
Martin 7% benefit (g4 turn into 5)
Upchurch no effect
previous studies no bovious diff with duration f CS to decmopression
> disparity, this intuituive to perform sooner
4.location
no diff in outcome (ruddle 2006)
5.size
larger
slower to recover
l1-l2 common, most type I, > 90% return to function
6.type
22% successful outocme with protursion compared to 80% extrusion
older lesions gradually compress causing irrevesible damage to cord
recurrence
with or without PF
reported rate of recurrence
0 – 24.4% with PF
2.7 – 41.7% without PF
across multiple studies over the last 50 years
definition of recurrence varies in the literature.
Some studies include only patients with neurologic deficits and confirmed compressive lesions
where as others also include those with any new signs of neck or back pain, so presumed IVDD without proving a disc-based cause
20% within 3 years (mayhew 2004)
40 % medically managed
The number of radiographically opacified IVD increases the risk of recurrence 1.4x in non-Dachshund breeds.
We know that IVDD is a body-wide condition in many affected animals and those that have symptomatic disease at 1 site are at risk for recurrence at another.
Furthermore, multiple studies have shown that almost 90% of thoracolumbar Type I IVDH occur between T11 and L3
So the goal of Prophylactic Fenestration is to creates a window in the anulus fibrosus to partially remove the nucleus pulposus
> thereby reducing or preventing future extrusion of disc material