Ch 54 radius and ulna Flashcards

1
Q

What percentage of weight at the elbow is transmitted through the radius and the ulna?

A

Radius 51%
Ulna 49%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Anatomy

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The tendons of which muscle insert on the medial side of the radius and ulna?

A

Biceps brachii
Bracialis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What muscles share their origin with both the radius and the ulna in the mid-diaphysis?

A

Pronator quadratus
Deep digital flexor
Abductor pollicus longus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

cranial muscles

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the radioulnar ligament?

A

Proximal extension of the antebrachiocarpal joint capsule between the radius and ulna. Attaches proximally to the interosseus ligament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How much of the growth below the elbow is the distal ulna physis responsible for?
Proximal radial physis?

A

Distal ulnar physis 100%
Proximal radial physis 30-50%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What age do the physes of the antebrachium close?

A

222-250d (in Beagles)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

aLDRA, Anatomic lateral distal radial angle; aMPRA, anatomic medial proximal radial angle.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the mean radial procurvatum of Labs?

A

26.6 degrees
(range, 14 to 39 degrees)

conformation of normal chondrodystrophic dogs possesses values far outside the ranges established

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How do you calculate procurvatum?

A

On sagittal view:

Procurvatum = CORA magnitude + (90-aCdPRA) + (90-aCdDRA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

radius procurvatum

A

what is considered “normal” for any individual within these breeds, and at what point the characteristic conformation seen becomes pathologic in the sense of resulting pain and disability, is unknown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

radial shortening

A
  • compensatory increase in growth at the proximal radius falls short of maintaining appropriate radial length
  • radius subsequently shortens > humeroradial and humeroulnar subluxation occur.
  • With increasing space, the humeral condyle becomes cranially displaced, putting pressure on the coronoid processes of the ulna
  • premature closure of the proximal radial physis can also result in overall radial shortening
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the sensitivity and specificity of rads for diagnosing radioulnar incongruity?

A

Sensitivity 78%
Specificity 86%
Radial shortening needed to be between 1.5-4mm for a 90% sensitivty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the sensitivty and specificity of arthroscopy for diagnosing radioulnar incongruity?

A

Sensitivity 94%
Specificity 81.9%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What it he sensitivity, specificity and interobserver agreement for radioulnar incongruency on 3D printed models with a 1mm incongruence

A

Sensitivity 82%
Specificity 100%
Interobservor agreement 87%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Radial shortening Tx

goal: reestablish radioulnar congruency at the elbow + bone alignment.

A
  • depending on the severity of the condition and the age
  • young animals may outgrow the correctional measures
  • Elbow joint congruence > either by lengthening the radius or by shortening the ulna
  • can be completed acutely or gradually
  • gradual > radius should cease its migration when the articular cartilage contacts the humeral capitulum
  • in immature > gradual/dynamic best
  • in skeletally mature dogs > any of gradual dynamic lengthening procedures (for stretching the soft tissues joining the two bones) OR one-stage radial elongations
  • for acute: confirm radial head position requires radiography or, optimally, arthroscopy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are the Tx options for radial lengthening? (4)

A

.1. Distraction osteogenesis
- advantages in the young animal, allow some adjustability to adapt to continued growth.
- Semi-controlled, gradual elongation: transverse osteotomy of the proximal radius and the placement of separate pins and radius and humerus with elastic material
- main advantage> little risk that the radial head will reposition too far proximally
- controlled: circular ESF, disadvantage is radial head position is under the direction of the surgeon

.2. Transverse osteotomy and acute correction
- use of bone spreaders for distraction, stabilization with plate or ESF
- large bone gap > lack of load sharing with the implant > consider cortical bone graft

.3. Sagittal sliding osteotomy (acute correction)
- preserving load sharing
- lag screw with neutral plate

.4. ulnar ostectomy above interosseous ligament
- shorten under the progressive use of the limb and the weight of the animal
- with an IM pin> dynamic + gradual shortening
- acutely shortened with hemicerclage
- recommended for mature animals.
- in puppies, the risk ostectomy gap may heal before

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How much radial lengthening has been reported with the use of an ESF and distraction osteogenesis?

A

Up to 50% of the original radial length

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

ulna shortening

A
  • geometric configuration of the distal growth plate is the primary reason why affected
  • Most physes are relatively flat > predispose to shear fractures
  • physis of the ulna is conical in shape and thus is unable to shear
  • force from any direction can cause compression > injury to the germinal cells
  • heritability of premature ulnar physeal closure as related to conformational development of specific breeds
  • ulna shortening can affect radius growth too
  • can cause humeroulnar incongruity (alter trochlear notch) excessive biomechanical loads on radial head and anconeal process > OA
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What percentage off physeal insults is made up of distal ulnar physeal injury?

A

63%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are the typical changes in the radius secondary to premature closure of the distal ulnar physis?

PTSDv

A

Procurvatum
Torsion
Shortening
Distal valgus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the surgical options for ulnar lengthening? (5)

A

(immature or mature)
Dynamic ulnar ostectomy/osteotomy
Distal ulnar ostectomy
ESF and distraction osteogenesis

(mature)
Distracted osteotomy and plating
Sagittal sliding osteotomy

proximal ulna guided in semi-controlled or controlled, dynamic or static

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

dynamic ulnar ostectomy

semi-controlled woth IM pin

A
  • skeletally immature patients, treatment of choice.
  • frees the proximal ulna, so it is no longer constrained by retarded growth of the distal physis, move proximally and optimize congruency with the humerus.
  • goal is to allow unrestricted longitudinal bone growth of the radius, may prevent worsening of radial angulation if growth potential still reside
  • In the immature, ostectomy is preferable > larger gap will help prevent osseous union before cessation of radial growth
  • mature dog, “osteotomy” because premature union is less of a concern
  • ostectomy just distal to the coronoid processes (semi-controlled), contraction of the triceps brachii muscle group exerts a traction force
  • Placement of Hohmann retractors around the ulna will isolate the ulna and protect the radius > sawing may be ceased, completed with osteotome
    complications:
  • pulling force of the triceps not perfectly axial but an angle, exerting a bending moment at ostectomy
  • bending/caudal displacement causes an iatrogenic recurvatum deformity (methods to counteract: IM pin, oblique ostectomy but wont work if large gap)
  • accidentally score the radius, result in a synostosing callus between the two bones.
  • Instability > formation of an exuberant callus > syostosis or irritate soft tisssue caudal ulna
  • pin migration
  • irritation of triceps brachii muscle
  • pin failure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
What can done to aid in stability of a proximal dynamic ulnar osteotomy/ostectomy? (2) | to prevent bending moment
Oblique cut (proximocaudal to craniodistal) IM pin (in immature) | revision sx: graft + plate
26
method used to avoid instability and recurvatum of the ostectomized ulna
ostectomy of the distal part of the ulnar diaphysis or removal of the distal physis itself - interosseous ligament to help stabilize - unknown is the comparative efficacy of low versus high dynamic ulnar ostectomies in the skeletally immature dog in reestablishing humeroulnar congruence - in vitro: distal to the interosseous ligament did not allow adequate movement of the ulna in one study
27
What methods can reduce the chances of permature healing of the ulna ostectomy? (3) | goal: unrestricted longitudinal bone growth of the radius
- Ostectomy gap greater than 1.5x diameter of the bone (Key’s hypothesis) - Removal of all periosteum in the vicinity - Insertion of free fat graft into ostectomy
28
What is the Heuter-Volkmann law (aka Delpech’s law)?
Physeal growth is slowed by excessive compression and is accelerated by distraction
29
Developmental antebrachial angulation
(1) asymmetric premature closure of the proximal or distal physis of the radius or both (2) premature closure of the distal physis of the ulna with continued radial development (3) a combination of the two - decisions regarding timing and the type of correction to be completed - skeletally immature risk: correction before development ceases is that the angulation can return - delay surgery until mature risk: angulation will negatively affect biomechanical loads at joints, creating stress + OA - success rate of ulnar ostectomy as the sole treatment for premature ulna closure of juvenile dogs is relatively unknown - reestablishing normal antebrachial bone and joint alignment, or resolution of lameness, not prospectively studied - PUO utility as the sole corrective procedure limited to mild radial changes - >> radial corrective measures are often necessary - likely that distal radial physis also damaged, resulting in more complex deformity
30
What had been associated with unsuccessful outcomes after a distal ulnar ostectomy to treat ulnar shortening?
Radial valgus greater than 25 degrees **If varus, recurvatum or internal torsion are present then radial corrective measures will be necessary**
31
Antebrachial Angular Limb Deformity Surgical Planning
presurgical planning called the center of rotation of angulation (CORA) method goal of this technique is to determine the apex of the deformity or deformities (also referred to as CORAs) using the radial anatomic or mechanical axis in conjunction with the joint orientation angles 1. normal contralateral antebrachium agles used or mean joint orientation angles (bilateral dz) 2. frontal plane joint orientation lines 3. frontal plane radial anatomic axes 4. Determine where the anatomic axes intersect within the cortical confines of the bone > CORA 5. repreat in sagital 6. If angulation in both orthogonal planes, then an oblique plane deformity is present radioulnar angular limb deformities frequently include torsion
32
ALD torsion
- torsion in excess of 15 degrees results in radiographic miscalculation greater than 5 degrees in the frontal plane - surgical planning based on orthogonal radiographs alone appears unreliable when severe torsion is present - require additional diagnostics such as CT +/- stereolithographic modeling (perform a rehearsal surgery)
33
rads of dog affected by angular and torsional deformities
1. Radiographs of the elbow are prioritized. > “straight elbow” radiograph, which will allow determination of elbow joint orientation lines and the anatomic axis of the proximal portion of the radius. 2. Radiographs of the carpus are prioritized. > “straight carpus” view that can be assessed for the joint orientation line and the distal radial anatomic axis.
34
Uniapical Deformities
- premature closure of the distal physis of the ulna and possible associated premature closure of the lateral aspect of the distal radial physis - valgus, procurvatum, and torsion of the radius. - gross appearance of cranial bowing of the antebrachium, valgus deviation and external rotation of the distal limb - CORA may occur anywhere > most frequently localized on/proximal to, the distal physis - radial deformities in distal diaphysis or metaphysis can occur congenitally and may result in lateral deviation and luxation of the radial head - deformities occur secondary to malunion
35
Biapical Deformities
- two CORAs within the cortical confines of the radius .1.Partially compensated - planes of the proximal and distal CORAs occur in opposite directions - result of the Hueter-Volkmann law - proximal CORA with varus deviation, partially compensated by a distal CORA with valgus deviation - many chondrodystrophic dogs naturally possess biapical, partially compensated .2. Noncompensated - planes of the two CORAs exist in the same direction, thus magnifying the overall deviation of the deformity in one direction
36
What percentage of antebrachial deformities are biapical in chondrodystrophic breeds?
80%
37
Multiapical Deformities
possess more than two CORAs
38
Surgical Correction planning
**integrity of the carpus** - should be assessed through palpation or stress radiography (laxity) - may result from severe radioulnar angulation due to substantial stretching of the joint capsule and collateral ligaments on the convex side of the deformation - often laxity subsides once the limb is straightened and biomechanical loads across the carpus are normalized - persistent laxity following surgery could negatively affect the long-term function and require additional surgery (imbrication, pancarpal arthrodesis) **uniapical** - single corrective osteotomy or ostectomy on the transverse bisecting line of the CORA. - closing wedge - cylindrical (incapable of achieving accurate correction of torsional deformities) - dome osteotomies (diminished accuracy in correcting sagittal plane, less bone apposition) - ESF with opening wedge osteotomy **Biapical** - may require correction of both CORAs, challenging + invasive due to small size of bone - ulna typically requires a releasing osteotomy at the level of each radial osteotomy (torsion may prevent fixation of ulna) - Gradual with bi-hinged circular ESF - bone plates and screw | care: avoid radial nerve, runs deep to supinator muscle
39
antebrachial angular limb deformity correction | knowledge of the CORA location, magnitude, and plane
- internal fixation with bone plates - linear external skeletal fixators - circular external skeletal fixators - hybrid linear-circular external skeletal fixator constructs each offers advantages and disadvantages: PLATE - less intensive post-op - no postoperative modification possible ESF - accuracy of correction and the adaptability, - opening wedge osteotomy has the advantage of preserving some limb length - disadvantage that fixation must be applied in buttress fashion - hinged circular ESF used, the angulation correction axis is determined by the axis of the hinges of the fixation frame - complications: wire breakage, skin irritation, osteomyelitis, and radial re-fracture
40
What percentage of dogs with an antebrachial deformity corrected with a CESF has improvement in function?
60%
41
What percentage of radial deformities in an oblique plane were accurately correced using a radial or cylindrical saw?
44%
42
A true domes osteotomy ascribes to which low of osteotomies?
Paley’s second rule
43
craniomedial approach
44
distal radius juxta-articular (metaphyseal or epiphyseal) deformity
- if hinged ring fixator > opening osteotomy may be placed on the CORA - insufficient bone or using a bone plate, then Paley's second rule can be employed > osteotomy proximal to the CORA. - result in a translational deformity - use cylindrical or true dome osteotomy blade
45
distal diaphyseal deformity, which results in congenital, laterally deviated radial head luxation
poorly understood etiopathogenesis open or closed reduction Open > acute correction and thus require the release of soft tissues constraining the radial head, can result in an unstable joint - TA-ESF humeroradial distraction - closing or opening wedge osteotomy positioned on the defined CORA. - The radial head is moved by placing the olive wire, reduced over a period of 7 to 10 days - radial head is maintained > pin through the radial head into the ulna - concurrent dynamic ulnar osteotomy will help to prevent humeroulnar subluxation - young: articular cartilage of the radial head is able to remodel in response to the forces - mature: reduction of the head may result in more severe incongruity between the radial head and the capitulum of the humerus, may be limited to salage tx only (amp, arthrodesis, Cx, head ostectomy) - Regardless of technique, early postoperative physical therapy is advocated
46
What are the treatment options for congenital radial head luxation?
- Conservative managment - Open surgical reducation and fixation (50% retained reduction of between 50-80%, 50% reluxated) - Radial head ostectomy (in young dog regrowth become exuberant, humeroulnar articulation in the adult dog) - Arthrodesis
47
ALD post-op care
ESF - monitoring of the pin–soft tissue interface (irritation or drainage) - pin failure or underlying osteomyelitis, which may require pin replacement or antimicrobial therapy, respectively. - frequent radiographic examination: presence of regenerative bone in the osteotomy gap, to allow appropriate modifications in distraction speed. internal fixation - rigid caudal splint or a bivalved cast - 4-6 weeks - destabilized over time as radiographs indicate increased healing.
48
prognosis
- severity of elbow osteoarthritis and more severe functional impairments were significant prognostic indicators - dogs with biapical deformities are more likely to possess joint pathology affecting the elbow, carpus, or both joints at the time of presentation - chondrodystrophic dog more likely to be severely afffected - discussed with the owners before surgery because osteoarthritic changes may mitigate postoperative results
49
Antebrachial Fracture in the Juvenile Patient
- Salter-Harris fracture of proximal or distal radial physes or the distal physis of the ulna proximal radius - challenging because of the small size of the epiphysis, the complexity of surrounding soft tissue, and the constraints of the elbow joint - ORIF, craniolateral approach - epiphysis is cross-pinned to the metaphysis with Kirschner wires distal physis of the radius - usually accompanied by a fracture of distal ulna - fluoroscopically guided closed reduction - Kirschner wires crossed, starting at the radial and ulnar styloid processes and directed proximally - caudal splint for 1 to 2 weeks to gain additional stability (protect against the force generated by the long lever arm) - removal of the implants in 4 to 6 weeks - possibility of **premature closing** of the radial or ulnar physes, may result in 3 issues: .1. radial shortening, .2. elbow joint incongruity .3. antebrachial angulation greenstick, or incomplete, fractures - nondisplaced nature, successfully achieved with external coaptation - immobilize both carpus and elbow
50
What is the tension surface of the radius?
cranial
51
Fractures of the Proximal Region of the Radius
fracture of the proximal radius, concurrent fracture of the ulna or dislocation of the elbow joint occurs frequently. - lateral approach - Identification of the radial nerve as it passes beneath the supinator - identification of small articular fragments may require arthroscopic assistance. - comminuted radial head and neck (with no load sharing) > internal fixation + circular external skeletal fixator - radial head does not possess enough bone for implant > used proximal ulna. Radial head attached to the ulna through soft tissues (annular ligament, cranial crura of the collateral ligaments, and joint capsule)
52
What are the surgical options for proximal radial fractures?
T-plate CESF Proximal ulna stabilised to distal radius with ESF (type Ib or type II)
53
Fractures of the Radial Diaphysis tx options
External Coaptation - Indications: isolated fracture of the radial or ulnar and stable fractures involving both radius and ulna. - young, medium-sized or larger dogs - unlikely to result in satisfactory healing of unstable fractures - regular reexamination at 1- to 2-week intervals + replacement (can increase $$$) - skin irritation, bandage sores, and ulcers - dealyed, malunion or nonunion internal fixation - open reduction (anatom. recon.) or via minimally invasive - indication: small- or toy-breed dog - plate on cranial surface - medial plate: ease of application and less interference with the tendons - polytrauma, large- or giant-breed, ulna can be simultaneously repaired - locking plates allow MIO: without complete disruption of the fracture hematoma or devascularization of bone fragments, plate is applied in distal-to-proximal fashion - postoperative rigid external coaptation is advocated > depends on age, fracture configuration, and degree of load sharing ESF - especially for comminuted and open # - advantage of being easily removable - positively threaded pins, more secure clamps, and stronger connecting rods, have obviated the need for more complex frame configurations + reduced complications associated with their use. - type Ia, Ib, and II frames - type Ib corridors minimize pin-associated morbidity + utilizes a larger bone surface area compared to type II - staged disassembly of this construct can be completed - circular: minimize interference with the motion of the elbow joint, “stretch” and “horseshoe” rings - prognosis for healing and good use of the limb was excellent, despite 100% of cases had some degree of drainage
54
Fractures of the Distal Region of the Radius
divided into articular and nonarticular fractures. - T-plate if sufficient bone is available or Circular ESF for the juxta-articular fracture (opposing olive wires are based on the ring) - cephalic vein and the tendon of the abductor pollicis longus muscle may be sacrificed fracture of the radial styloid process - avulsion injury at the site where the medial collateral ligament is attached - Kirschner wires and a tension band or a screw in lag fashion - salvage > pancarpal arthrodesis.
55
Fractures of the Radius and Ulna in Toy-Breed Dogs
Studies toy vs large breed: - toy-breed antebrachii are more susceptible to fracture when loaded because of morphologic differences in the bone - small-breed dogs possess decreased vascular density > can result in a delayed healing - small cross-sectional area cause trick apposition - tx should focus on: rigid stabilization and optimizing apposition while preserving the surrounding blood supply Tx - ESF with acrylic connecting bars (predrill/low speed to avoid necrosis) - ORIF interrupting the overlying soft tissues, but ensure rigid stabilization, excellent apposition, interfragmentary compression, and access to apply a bone graft - supportive soft-padded bandage or caudal splint for 3 to 4 weeks
56
What percentage of r/u fracture in toy breed treated with external coaptation resulted in malalignment or nonunion? Successful return to function with bone plate? Complication rate?
Coaptation **83%** Bone plate - Successful **70 - 85%** - Complications **54%** (skin irritation, cold conduction, synostosis, angulation, osteopenia, plate failure, and screw loosening)
57
What should you do if there is evidence of stress protection (osteopaenia) on rads? | thinning cortices or reduced opacity of the underlying bone
Staged screw removal once clinical union is evident - Start with screws closest to the fracture on each side - Waiting 3-4 weeks after removal prior to removing the next set (allows holes to fill in)
58
What is the tension surface of the ulna?
Caudal
59
Fractures of the proximal Ulna | radius transmits load between elbow and carpus
Nonarticular ulnar fractures proximal to the elbow joint are usually avulsion fractures of the olecranon - pull of the triceps brachii muscle group, tensile forces must be counteracted - caudal or lateral approach > lateral has less pressure when lying sternally; thus, incision dehiscence may be avoided - two Kirschner wires and a tension band along the caudal aspect - retrograde fashion reduces the risk inadvertently directed into the trochlear notch - fixation strength increases with increasing implant diameter, and wire diameter is more critical than pin diameter articular # - minimize changes associated with secondary osteoarthritis - bone plate and screws along the caudal or lateral cortex of the bone - caudal: biomechnically because tension surface, disadvantage soft tissue coverage is sparse, may become irritated - comminuted fractures of the proximal part of the ulna may require interfragmentary compression techniques - Nonreducible fractures > ESF, severe osteoarthritis and loss ROM are certain sequelae.
60
What are the 4 types of Monteggia fracture? | ulna # accompanied by subluxation or luxation of the radial head
Type I: Cranial luxation of the radial head with cranioproximal angulation of ulnar fracture Type II: Caudal luxations of the radius and caudal angulation of ulnar fracture Type III: Lateral luxation of the radius Type IV: Fracture of the proximal part of the radius and the ulna diaphysis with cranial luxation of the radial head - annular ligament is still intact, closed reduction of the radial head + IM pin (and cast) - fractures of the ulna distal to the coronoid processes, the radioulnar joint is also luxated, thus necessarily disrupting the annular ligament - If the radioulnar joint is no longer intact, will have to stabilise once radial head is reduced (screw from caudal to cranial) + plate for ulna - radioulnar screws are subject to tremendous shear forces, To eliminate the effect on limiting radioulnar motion and prevent screw failure, screws may be removed 4 to 6 weeks following repair. | ulna is most frequently fractured just distal to the coronoid processes
61
Fractures of the Distal Region of the Ulna
Most fractures of the distal part of the ulna are associated with fracture of the radius; epair of the radius, stabilization of the ulna is not necessary. - large dogs, or in situations in which bilateral thoracic limb injuries are present, additional support may be required - bone plate to the lateral surface of the ulna - normograde IM pin ulnar styloid process - proximal attachment of the lateral collateral ligament of the antebrachiocarpal joint and thus provides stability to the joint, must be repaired - Kirschner wire and a figure of eight tension band
62
rate of non-union of radius and ulna - in cats? - dogs?
cats: 16.7%, dogs - 17.9% delayed union - 3.4% non-union
63
Ulnar resorption or non-union has been reported in 35–80% of cases of radial and ulnar fracture in dogs
17% of all radial and ulnar fracture repairs combined with external coaptation were associated with soft tissue injuries which represented 69% of all confirmed complications (De Arburn Parent et al. 2017).
64
Effects of simulated radioulnar synostosis on supination and pronation in cats. A cadaveric study Senn 2024
Ex vivo biomechanical study. simulated radioulnar synostosis in cats Induced radioulnar synostosis decreases antebrachial rotation by more than two-thirds, Implants fixating the radius to the ulna should be avoided in cats, regardless where they are located along the radial diaphysis. could lead to impairment of forelimb function and lameness if possible, reconstruction of the annular ligament would be preferable dogs prevalence of 11%, cats 12%, for radioulnar synostosis reported after radioulnar fractures
65
Feline radial and ulnar diaphyseal fractures: a retrospective study of 49 cases comparing single bone fixation and dual bone fixation Makar 2024
retrospectively, 6 referral clinics, Dual bone fixation was used in 13/49 (26.5%) cases, with only 1/13 (7.7%) having major complications. By comparison, 4/36 (11.1%) of single plated fractures had major complications. Single bone fixation was 14.25 times more likely to have a successful outcome compared with dual bone fixation no significant difference in the rate of minor and major complications between the SBF and DBF groups increase in stiffness with DBF clinical decision bias where DBF may be used in more complex fractures (36%) of the SBF cases had either an intact radius or ulna majority located in the distal diaphysis incidence of major complications in cases requiring revision surgery or even limb amputation was 10.2% cats having almost double the range of supination. Comminution of the fracture and concurrent orthopaedic issues did not significantly affect the outcome
66
CI When confidence intervals are narrow, we can be relatively certain about how effective a treatment is, but when they are wide, the opposite is true. With a 95 percent confidence interval, you have a 5 percent chance of being wrong
67
Evaluation of computer-aided design software methods for assessment of the three-dimensional geometry of the canine radius Karen M. Park
Results indicated that use of CADS to assess the 3-D orientation of the proximal, diaphyseal, and distal segments of normal and abnormal canine radii yielded highly repeatable and reliable measurements
68
Anatomy of the distal radioulnar ligament in cats Basa 2023
In the cat, there appears to be a less extensive interosseous component of the distal radioulnar ligament compared with the dog These anatomical differences may account for increased rotation of the feline antebrachium and have clinical implications, particularly with regard to the management of antebrachiocarpal joint injuries
69
Clinical outcomes of orthogonal plating to treat radial and ulnar fractures in toy-breed dogs Higuchi 2021
medical records, Fifteen limbs that underwent initial fracture repair and five that underwent revision surgery met the inclusion criteria. using non-locking cuttable plates long plate working length resulted in minimal compression of the periosteal blood vessels close cancellous bone grafting applied in all cases Synostosis + Re-fracture after cranial plate removal was observed in one case each radial and ulnar radiographic union was achievedafter a mean of 6.1 ± 1.5 and 5.7 ± 1.7 weeks, > open reduction with OP to the fracture region did not adversely influence radial and ulnar fracture removed the cranial plate after radial or ulnar bone union became evident destabilisation by removal of the OP cranial plate may be beneficial, leading to increased loading of the bone which could accelerate healing (Claes et al. 2011)
70
A Retrospective Study of Postoperative Development of Implant-Induced Osteoporosis in Radial–Ulnar Fractures inToy Breed Dogs Treated with Plate Fixation Muroi 2021
226 cases. implant-induced osteoporosis assessed by ratio of pixel values (PVR) - significant decrease in PVR from 1-12m post-plate fixation - persistent in dogs ≥6m age, improved/corrected in dogs <6m age - PVR not affected by screw removal - destabilisation with plate removal → increased PVR after 3m - may be more affected by age at time of injury than fixation method - possibly related to plate contact (?) - screw removal had no effect on PVR osteoporosis > major cause of refractures after implant removal. Biphasic> 8 to12 weeks due to impaired periosteal blood flow caused by plate compression on the bone and at 24 to 36 weeks due to reduced mechanical stress on the bone. According toWolff’s law, reduction in bone mineral density can occur due to reduced mechanical stress (stress shielding)
71
Stabilization of Olecranon Fractures by Tension Band Wiring or Plate Osteosynthesis: A Retrospective Study of 41 Cases Fournet 2018
olecranon fracture treated by tension band wire or plate osteosyntehsis - complications: overall 52%, 36.5% major, 29.2% minor - TBW 72% complications, plate 27% - implant failure only seen with TBW – proposed due to inappropriate selection - excellent long-term outcome regardless of technique
72
Randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial of autologous greater omentum free graft versus autogenous cancellous bone graft in radial and ulnar fractures in miniature breed dogs baltzer 2018
Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial 25 dogs Power Doppler ultrasonographic, computed tomographic (CT), and radiographic examinations Pressure-sensitive walkway gait analysis Radiographic healing occurred earlier in bones treated with OG (median, 9 weeks) than in those treated with BG (12 weeks). bones retained more vessels and greater signal intensity when treated with OG compared with treatment with BG in dogs perceived to be at risk for such complications OG did not result in major complications but led to limb swelling and erythema in 64% of dogs Conclusion: Omental grafting was not associated with major complications, and it accelerated bone healing and return to weight bearing in dogs. the effect of OG to improve healing and function postoperatively compared to no augmentation remains unknown.
73
Ulnocarpal arthrodesis as a new treatment for ectrodactyly in a dog and a cat VI Vallios, KR Crosse 2024
74
Stress Changes in the Canine Radius after Locking Plate Fixation Using Finite Element Analysis Norihiro Muroi 2024
stress changes in the radii beneath the locking plates (LP) When an axial load is applied to the radius, LP placement reduces the tension stress on the cortical bone of the radius beneath the plate, possibly related to implant-induced osteoporosis and bone formation in the cortical bone beneath the plate In contrast to the conventional plate technique, the LP technique is engineered for relative stability and secondary bone healing
75
Use of a free proximal ulnar autograft for ipsilateral radial lengthening in a dog with a short radius and subsequent elbow incongruity JSevy 2024
Case report. Animals: An 8-month-old female spayed Border Collie In dogs with radial shortening and elbow incongruity, use of an ipsilateral proximal ulnar autograft with rigid internal fixation can be an effective treatment for radial lengthening to improve elbow congruity and resolve lameness.