Biological Area Flashcards
What are the principles of the biological area?
Our behaviour is affected by our physiology such as genetics, hormones and brain structure and function
Brain structure and functioning impacts on behaviour but can also be influenced by experiences.
What are the key concepts of the biological area?
Use of scientific equipment (e.g MRI)
Brain plasticity
What are the core studies within the biological area?
Blakemore and Cooper
Maguire
Sperry
Casey
What are the strengths of the biological area?
Often high in internal reliability due to the tightly controlled lab conditions
We can establish cause and effect by having tightly controlled lab conditions
What are the weaknesses of the biological area?
Can lack ecological validity as often uses lab experiments
Is often reductionist by only investigating biological causes of behaviour
How useful is the research of the biological area?
Useful for drug therapy treatment for specific discords. For example, SSRIs can be used as a way of treating people with depression and work by increasing the availability of serotonin in the brain’s synapses.
What is the background of Sperry?
In the 1940’s a treatment was developed called ‘Split Brain Surgery’ (called commissurotomy) that included the corpus callosum being cut so that the abnormal electrical impulses could not spread throughout the brain.
What are the aims of Sperry?
To study the functions of separated and independent hemispheres
What is the sample of Sperry?
11 male and female patients who had undergone a commissurotomy to control their symptoms of epilepsy
What is the procedure of Sperry?
Objects were presented in the right and left visual field.
Different visual stimuli were presented simultaneously to different visual fields (e.g. an image of an apple to the left vf; an image of a key to the right visual field), and the participant was asked to draw with his left hand (out of sight) what he had seen
Simple mathematical problems were presented to the left visual field. A nude pin-up was presented to the left visual field
Objects were felt by the right hand only (unseen by the participant)
Objects were felt by the left hand only (unseen by the participant)
What are the results of Sperry?
Split brain patients could name the object flashed to the right visual field but not if flashed to the left visual field. But could point towards the object and identifying it from an array of objects
What are the conclusions of Sperry?
Left hemisphere can communicate anything from the right visual field, or experiences of the right side of the body.
Right hemisphere can process mathematical/spatial information.
Left hemisphere can communicate anything from the right visual field, or experiences of the right side of the body
Right hemisphere can show NON-VERBALLY that mental processes from left visual field and left side of body are present
What was the research method in Sperry?
Quasi-Experiment
How does Sperry relate to the biological area?
Sperry’s study falls within the biological area as it is investigating regions of the brain and lateralisation of brain function. Specifically, it demonstrated the importance of the corpus callosum as a communication pathway between the left and right hemispheres and provided evidence of the different functions each hemisphere performs
How does Sperry relate to the key theme?
In relation to the key theme of regions of the brain, Sperry’s study sheds light on the function of the corpus callosum as a communication pathway between the two hemispheres was made evident in this study.
How is Sperry valid?
The findings of the study would be unlikely to be reproduced in a real-life situation, however, or to have any impact in real life, because a person with a severed corpus callosum who had both eyes open would be able to compensate. Therefore, the study lacks ecological validity.
The sample was male and female patients who had undergone a commissurotomy, therefore this is unlikely to be generalisable to ‘normal’ brains. However, it could be representative of people with commissurotomy.
How is Sperry reliable?
Within the study, Sperry found general trends in the lateralisation of brain function in the split-brain participants, and the similarities from split-brain participant to split-brain participant suggest that some of these findings are reliable. However, the ‘outright exceptions’ noted in some of the participants are a challenge to the reliability of the findings.
Is Sperry ethnocentric?
We could argue that Sperry’s study is not ethnocentric as it was investigating a species specific behaviour.
On the other hand, Sperry notes that there were individual differences and exceptions to the rule in the split-brain patients.
Our environment and culture influences affects how our brain develops, so it might be that people not raised in a Western environment might show differences in their brain lateralisation.
Which side of the nature/nurture debate does Sperry support?
Sperry could be nurture because their experiences like having a split brain surgery influenced the ability of the patients, for example no longer being able to name objects that they touch with their left hand out of sight.
Which side of the free will/determinism debate does Sperry support?
Sperry’s study suggests a position of biological determinism as undergoing a commissurotomy will mean that split-brain patients are (for example) no longer able to name objects that they touch with their left hands out of sight. Their inability to do this is determined by physiological factors.
Which side of the reductionism/holism debate does Sperry support?
Sperry is could be reductionist because it is mainly focusing on the single factor of patients with a commissurotomy and how that influences their behaviour.
Which side of the individual/situational debate does Sperry support?
Sperry could be more situational because depending on the circumstances, their ability to do things like remember to name objects they touch with their left hand out of sight is unavailable.
How useful is the research of Sperry ?
Sperry’s work was ground-breaking in beginning to understand the physiognomy of the brain; that is, how the brain works. It revealed the importance of the corpus callosum as a pathway for internal communication between the two sides of the brain. This can be seen as intrinsically useful.
How have the ethical considerations been kept/broken in Sperry?
The study was conducted ethically as the participants consented to be studied, no deception was used, and they were neither harmed nor unduly stressed by the experimental tests.