Arguments using observation and reason essay Flashcards
what is essay 1 ?
assess the cosmological argument
what is the intro essay 1 ?
A Posteriori argument
Cosmological - trying to prove the existence of God by explaining that everything must have a cause except God
what scholars is it essay 1 ?
Aquinas, bertrand russell, hume, william lane craig, hilbert
point para 1 essay 1
Aquinas first way
argument from motion - there cannot be an infinite regress of movers. Therefore there must be an unmoved mover . he calls this god
Motion means the change from potentiality to actuality
counter para 1 essay 1
David Hume - Book: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779)- infinite regress could be possible , just because its hard to understand doesnt mean it is impossible
Aquinas is only assuming the universe has a beginning
J.L.Mackie - train example - you can have an inifinite number of train carriages but still needs an engine in charge - like a pm
counter counter para 1 essay 1
Hilberts Hotel
intended to show that actual infinites cannot exist in this universe
point para 2 essay 1 ?
Second way - argument from cause
everything within the universe is the result of a succession of causes
an infinitely long chain of causes is not possible therefore there must be an uncaused causer
counter para 2 essay 1
Bertrand Russel
if all things have a cuase , then does this mot mean God must also have a cause
causes are regilarly observed in localised areas of space and time , but this doesnt mean the same for a larger scale - wrong to assume when there is no scientific evidence
maybe the case that infinites exist in nature in ways that humans aren’t aware of
ALSO- BIG BANG
countercounter para 2 essay 1
William Lane Craig - kalam cosmolgical argument
All things that begin to exist has a cause. The universe began to exits so therefore has a cause
also - was something needed to start the big bang ?
what is essay 2 ?
Assess the ontological argument
what is the intro essay 2 ?
A priori argument
Ontological - God is the greatest thing he must exist because a God that exists is greater than a God that does not exist
what is the scholars essay 2 ?
Anselm, Descartes, Gaunilo , Kant, Hume
what is ur view essay 2 ?
point para 1 essay 1 ?
Anselm’s ontological argument - Chap 2 of his work Proslogian (1078), he states 2 premises and a conclusion about existence of God
these were P1: TTWNGCBC P2:It is better to exist in reality to exist in the mind
Conc: Therefore, God must exist
counter para 1 essay 1
Gaunilo - in his book “on behalf of the fool”- he gives the example of the island
It may be a perfect island which we are thinking of but that doesnt mean it exists - we need empirical evidence in order to know that God exists
“If someone wishes to persuade me that this island really exists beyond all doubt, I should either think he was joking or should i find it hard to judge who was the bigger fool- I , for believing him or he for thinking he had proved the existence of the island with any certanty”- check quote