anthropological theories Flashcards

1
Q

L. H. Morgan - Contribution to Evolutionary Study

A

American lawyer, Classical evolutionary thinker
Lewis Henry Morgan made significant contributions to evolutionary study. Here are five heading phrases summarizing his contributions:

  1. Social Evolution: Evolutionary Stages in Human Societies
  2. Kinship and Descent Systems: Comparative Analysis
  3. Cultural Anthropology: Ethnographic Methodology
  4. Material Culture: Technological Development
  5. Theoretical Framework: Evolutionary Progression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Evolution of Kinship Terminology (L. H. Morgan)book

A

Title: \System of Consanguinity and Affinities of Human Family" (1871)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Evolution of Whole/Entire Society (L. H. Morgan book

A

Title: \Ancient Society" (1877)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Evolution of Marriage (Family) (L. H. Morgan)
pcp spm

A

Stages: Promiscuity, Consanguinous marriage, Punaluan marriage, Syndasmian marriage, Patriarchal marriage, Monogamous marriage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evolution of Political Organization (L. H. Morgan)

A

Types: Societus (political system dependent on kinship),
Civitus (political system independent of kinship)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Criticism of Morgan’s Contributions

A

Critiques: Conjecturalism, Secondary data,
Achievement: Some approximating field work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Contribution of Frazer to Classical Evolutionism

A

James Frazer: English anthropologist, Works: \Golden Bough" and "Totemism and Exogamy"”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evolution of Science (Frazer)

A

Sequence: Magic -> Religion -> Science

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Theory of Totemism (Frazer)BOOK

A

Works: \Golden Bough"

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Impact and Criticism of Frazer

A

Impact: Evolutionist in the 20th century, Critique: Lack of significant impact due to discrediting of evolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Criticism of Classical Evolutionism

A

Critiques: Lack of proper data, Ignorance of other processes of social change (e.g., diffusion), Conjecturalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Criticisms by Westermarck family

A

Specific Critique: Monogamy and nuclear families in simple societies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Criticisms by Franz Boas

A

Critiques: Lack of data collection, Introduction of fieldwork tradition, Empirical approach in anthropology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Criticisms by Diffusionists

A

Critiques: Neglect of diffusion as a way of cultural change, Neglect of human invention and creativity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Criticisms by Functionalism

A
  • Marxism:
    • Ignores class struggle and economic inequalities
    • Overlooks exploitation and power imbalances
  • Symbolic Interactionism:
    • Neglects individual agency and micro-level interactions
    • Too deterministic, ignoring subjective experiences
  • Feminism:
    • Fails to address gender inequalities and patriarchy
    • Overlooks women’s roles and experiences
  • Postmodernism:
    • Overemphasizes stability, ignoring fluid and fragmented social realities
    • Too rigid and fails to account for diversity and multiplicity of perspectives
  • Conflict Theory:
    • Ignores ongoing societal conflicts and tensions
    • Overlooks the role of power struggles in shaping society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Criticisms Against Psychic Unity

A

Critique: Lack of proof for the theory of psychic unity of mankind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Criticisms Against Comparative Method

A

Critique: Equating contemporary primitive societies with prehistoric societies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Criticisms Related to Victorian Society

A

Critique: Considering Victorian society as the highest stage of development (ethnocentrism)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Criticisms Against Progressive Evolution

A

Critique: Evolution as change rather than progressive or retrogressive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Historical Particularism of Boas - Franz Boas

A

Developed historical particularism, Criticized ethnocentrism of evolutionism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Premises of Historical Particularism (Boas)
odd ur mg

A

Overcoming empirical problems,
Detailed regional studies,
Discovering distribution of cultural traits,
Understanding individual processes of cultural change,
Reconstructing histories,
Meticulous collection and organization of ethnographic data,
Generalizing about cultural development after gathering information on particulars

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Methodology of Historical Particularism (Boas)

A

Studying local history, Long stay with local people, Learning local language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Nature of Historical Particularism

A

Approach to understanding the nature of culture and change in a particular culture, Emphasis on data collection before making assumptions or interpretations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Data Collection in Historical Particularism

A

Recording oral history tradition, Participant observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Accomplishments of Historical Particularism (Boas)

A

Importance of data collection, Fieldwork studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Criticism of Historical Particularism (Boas)

A

Reluctance to generate broad theories of cultural development, Questioning the point of gathering detailed data without broader theoretical frameworks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Emergence and Reaction to Classical Evolutionism - Similarities

A

Both British and German schools emerged as reactions to classical evolutionism.
Criticized classical evolutionism for neglecting societal change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Diffusion and Evolution Relationship - Similarities

A

Both schools asserted that diffusion and evolution are interconnected processes. Common Premises: Unequal inventiveness of the human mind. Displacement of people for better opportunities leading to cultural contact and diffusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Nature of Diffusion - Differences

A

British School (Extreme Diffusionism): Led by Smith, Perry, and Rivers’ school. Emphasized extreme diffusionism.
German School (Multiple Centers of Diffusionism): Advocated multiple centers of diffusionism. Recognized various sources of origin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Source of Cultural Diffusion - Differences

A

British School (Single Source of Origin): Smith and Perry proposed a single source of origin.
German School (Multiple Sources of Origin): Rivers suggested multiple sources for cultural diffusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Criteria for Diffusion - Differences

A

British School (No Criteria): Did not establish specific criteria for diffusion.
German School (Criteria of Forms and Quantity): Considered both forms and quantity as criteria for diffusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Objectives of Diffusionism - Differences

A

British School (Show and Trace Path of Diffusion): Aimed to show and trace the unfettered path of diffusion from the center to various parts of the world.
German School (Demonstrate Occurrence of Diffusion): Focused on demonstrating the occurrence of diffusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Attention to Cultural Aspects - Differences diffusion school

A

British School (only Material Culture): Emphasized material culture and neglected non-material culture.
German School (Both Material and Non-Material Culture): Paid attention to both material and non-material aspects of culture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Typology of Diffusion - Differences

A

British School (No Typology): Did not establish a typology of diffusion.
German School (Distinction between Types): Made a distinction between direct/primary and indirect/secondary diffusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Relationship with Evolution - Differences

A

British School (Isolation): Gave importance to the evolution and diffusion of culture in isolation.
German School (Integration): Attempted to integrate evolution with the diffusion of cultural traits. Addressed sociocultural change from simple to complex and discussed the diffusion of cultural traits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

American School of Diffusionism in Anthropology - Historical Background

A

Boas & Wissler. Influence and Link with German School.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Rejection of Morgan’s Three-Stage Classification

A

Boas and Wissler rejected Morgan’s three-stage classification of savagery, barbarism, and civilization.
Influenced by German museum methodology, they classified cultural elements from the same geographic region together.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Development of Culture Area Concept

A

Cultural items of American Indian tribes living close to each other were found to be more similar
. The concept of ‘Culture Area’ emerged from this observation, first used by O. T. Mason.
Further developed by Clark Wissler, attributing similarities in culture areas to diffusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Premises/Features of Culture Area - Definition of Culture Area

A

A geographical zone with several groups living together, showing cultural similarity when grouped together.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Premises/Features of Culture Area - Culture Centre

A

Each culture area has a central point called ‘Culture Centre’ with the greatest concentration of culture. Culture Centre controls the entire area politically, socially, and in terms of economy, politics, and religion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Premises/Features of Culture Area - Diffusion from Culture Centre

A

Cultural traits spread centrifugally from the Culture Centre. Traits are not diffused within the same area but spread from one culture area to another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Premises/Features of Culture Area - Greatest Concentration of Traits

A

Culture Centre is where the greatest concentration of cultural traits exists in their pristine form.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Construction of Culture Area: Food as Criterion - Basis for Constructing Culture Area

A

Food as a criterion for constructing Culture Area.
Each American Indian tribe, having its own myth of origin, inhabits a specific eco-zone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Construction of Culture Area: Food as Criterion - Wissler’s Food Areas and Culture Areas
bg ce sn wc me iiwsp

A

Wissler used food as a criterion and identified 6 Food Areas corresponding to Culture Areas:
Bison: Great Plains,
Caribou: Eskimos,
Salmon fish: North Pacific Coast to Plateau,
Wild seed: California,
Maize: Eastern part of America,
Intensive agriculture: Indian group of Western America, South West America, Peru

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Technology and Environment

A

People exploit their environment with technology. Technology is invented based on the driving force of their environment, especially concerning food.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Cultural Evolution - Definition

A

Process of social and cultural change from simple to complex, moving from homogeneity to heterogeneity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Cultural Evolution - Nature

A

More complicated compared to Cultural Diffusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Cultural Evolution - Process

A

Occurs by alteration, invention, or diffusion of cultural elements. Evolution may or may not aid diffusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Cultural Evolution - Nature of evolution

A

To change existing simpler items and complexes in a society to a more complex order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Cultural Diffusion - Definition

A

Process where cultural elements, complexes, and aspects pass from one group to another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Cultural Diffusion - Nature

A

Simple in nature compared to Cultural Evolution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Cultural Diffusion - Process

A

Occurs only by borrowing of cultural elements. Diffusion definitely aids evolution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Cultural Diffusion - Result

A

Adds more new items to a culture or society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Bronislaw Malinowski - Theory

A

Biocultural/Psychological Functionalism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

Bronislaw Malinowski -studied influencedby

A

Studied Australian aborigines. Influenced by Golden Bough.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

Bronislaw Malinowski - Premises

A

Individual needs,
hierarchy of needs,
importance to culture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Bronislaw Malinowski - Methodology

A

Biological and integrative needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

Bronislaw Malinowski - Background

A

Psychologist turned anthropologist after reading James Frazer’s book.

59
Q

A.R. Radcliffe-Brown - Theory

A

Structural Functionalism.

60
Q

A.R. Radcliffe-Brown - Studies

A

Studied Andamanese. Influenced by sociologists, mainly Durkheim.

61
Q

A.R. Radcliffe-Brown - Premises

A

Social needs, necessary conditions of existence, importance of society.

62
Q

A.R. Radcliffe-Brown - Methodology

A

Social structure and function.

63
Q

A.R. Radcliffe-Brown - Background

A

Earlier an evolutionist, turned to diffusionism, and finally became a functionalist.

64
Q

Claude Levi-Strauss - Historical Background

A

Coined the term ‘social structure.’ Influenced by Herbert Spencer, Emile Durkheim, and A.R. Radcliffe-Brown.

65
Q

Claude Levi-Strauss - Premises

A

Society has a basic structure (mind), variations due to permutations of basic structure elements.

66
Q

Claude Levi-Strauss - Methodology

A

Applied language as a model.
Used phonemes in linguistics as a model for society.

67
Q

Claude Levi-Strauss - Four Basic Operations in Study of Society

A
  • Similar to structural linguistics.
  • Elements of meaning in kin terms.
  • Integration to acquire meaning.
  • Built on the subconscious level.
68
Q

Claude Levi-Strauss - Evaluation

A

Criticized for its ambitious plan to find universal propositions of human mind. Lost popularity due to lack of focus on social change.

69
Q

Introduction to National Character Study - National character studies

A

Culture and personality studies.
Complex cultures.
National character.
Studies of culture at a distance.

70
Q

Purpose of National Character Studies -

A
  • Guidance for government and military policy
  • Cooperation among wartime allies.
  • Post-war world planning.
71
Q

Theoretical Origin of National Character Studies - Configurationalist approach (Sapir and Benedict)

A

Basic personality structure (Linton and Kardiner).
Modal personality approach (Cora DuBois).

72
Q

Techniques of National Character Studies - Study of culture at a distance

A
  • Indirect research.
  • Reminiscences and interviews.
  • Analysis of literature, cartoons, articles, and photographs.
73
Q

Major Works of National Character Studies - Differentiating Japanese and Chinese characters

A

Studies on cultures of France, Spain, Czechoslovakia, Poland, etc. Key scholars: Ruth Benedict, Margaret Mead, Geoffrey Gorer.

74
Q

Margaret Mead?s Approaches - Analysis of relationships and basic learning

A

Societal studies of interpersonal relationships.
Comparative descriptions of cultural configurations.

75
Q

Basic Personality Traits - Working minority traits

A

Erich Fromm’s view on discipline, orderliness, and punctuality.

76
Q

Contribution of National Character Studies - Socialization beyond infancy

A

Effect of national discourses on personal character.
Contribution to the understanding of the rise of nations and international relations.

77
Q

Analysis of National Character Studies - Social Darwinism

A

Criticism for homogeneity and over-generalization.
Geoffrey Gorer’s ‘swaddling hypothesis’.

78
Q

Introduction to Ruth Benedict’s Contribution - Culture-personality scholar

A

Concept of ‘culture pattern’. Foundation of personalities in anthropology.

79
Q

Historical Background of Ruth Benedict - Student of Franz Boas

A

Emphasis on understanding patterned culture.
Development of ‘Culture Pattern’ concept in ‘Pattern of Culture’.

80
Q

Concept of Culture Pattern - Cultural traits

A

Cultural complexes. Integration into a ‘culture pattern’. Linking cultural complexes to form patterns.

81
Q

Methodology of Study - Fieldwork and comparative study mm

ca
iad
pd

A

Comparison of American tribes.
Identification of Apollonian and Dionysian patterns.
Later merging Paranoid with Dionysian.

82
Q

Apollonian and Dionysian Patterns - Apollonian

A

Docile, emphasis on sharing, non-aggressive.

83
Q

Apollonian and Dionysian Patterns - Dionysian

A

Aggressive, competitive, luxurious lifestyle.
Recognition of diverse personality patterns.

84
Q

Criticism of Ruth Benedict’s Work - Critique by Morris Oppler

A

Diversity of cultural themes
. Plurality of cultural ideas.

85
Q

Support for Ruth Benedict - Support from Margaret Mead

A

Foundation of different personalities under cultural impact.

86
Q

Margaret Mead’s Contribution to Anthropology - Culture-personality school proponent
SFRS

A

Student of Franz Boas.
Support for Ruth Benedict’s work.
Study of socialization impact on behavior.

87
Q

Margaret Mead’s Contribution to Anthropology - Mead’s Books and Findings

A

‘Coming of Age in Samoa’. Adolescence marked with stress. Samoa’s different view on bodily changes. American crisis due to cultural prohibition.
‘Sex and Temperament’. Comparison of Arapesh, Mundugumor, Tshamhole. Different central values in each culture. Human nature shaped by culture.

88
Q

Margaret Mead’s Contribution to Anthropology - Evaluation of Mead’s Work

A

Ethnographic nature of work.
Showing cultural practices influence personality.

89
Q

Ralph Linton’s Cultural Background of Personality - Division into overt and covert culture

A

Overt culture: Material and Kinaesthetical
. Covert culture: Core of culture.
Core-Periphery Hypothesis.

90
Q

Ralph Linton’s Cultural Background of Personality - Linton’s Core Periphery Hypothesis

A

Change at the core affects the culture.
Peripheral change is more acceptable.
Culture influencing personality.
Introduction of psycho-dynamism.

91
Q

Kardiner’s Contribution to Culture-Personality School - ‘Psychological Frontier of Society’ book

A

Common personality due to shared socialization.
Basic Personality Type.
Study of primary and secondary institutions.
Impact of culture on collective personality.

92
Q

Cora-du Bois? Contribution to Culture-Personality School - WWII context

A

Study of culture at a distance.
Projective technique.
Modal personality approach.

93
Q

Cora-du Bois? Contribution to Culture-Personality School - Modal personality characteristics

A

Application by other anthropologists.

94
Q

Cora-du Bois? Contribution to Culture-Personality School - Application by other anthropologists

A

V. G. Childe’s Contribution to Neo-evolutionism.

95
Q

V. G. Childe’s Contribution to Neo-evolutionism - Archaeologist

A

‘Man Makes Himself’ book. Division of archaeological periods.

96
Q

V. G. Childe’s Contribution to Neo-evolutionism - Cultural periods

A

Savagery, Barbarism, Civilization. Progression of tools. Emphasis on material aspects.

97
Q

Leslie White’s Contribution to Neo-evolutionism - Background

A

Boasian dissatisfaction. Universal standard of measurement.

98
Q

Leslie White’s Contribution to Neo-evolutionism - Culture as behavior manipulating energy

A

Laws of evolution. Technological theory of evolution.

99
Q

Leslie White’s Contribution to Neo-evolutionism - Criticism

A

Neglect of particular cultures and environment.

100
Q

Unilinear Evolution

A

Sequence from simple to complex.
Psychic unity of mankind.
Progressive and disregards cultural diversity.

101
Q

Universal Evolution

A

Part of neo-evolutionism.
Evolution of mankind’s culture as a whole.
Successive stages, not always progressive.

102
Q

Multilinear Evolution

A

No single line of evolution.
Many lines, each with unique characteristics
. Emphasis on particular cultures.
Accepts cultural variation and diversity.

103
Q

Contribution of Julian Steward to Neo-evolutionism - Introduction

A

Critic of Leslie White. Focused on particular evolution.

104
Q

Contribution of Julian Steward to Neo-evolutionism - Evolution Types

A

Unilinear: Classical evolutionists, psychic unity, progressive. Universal: Neo-evolutionism, mankind’s culture as a whole, stages.
Multilinear: Many lines, environment impact, cultural diversity.

105
Q

Contribution of Julian Steward to Neo-evolutionism - Promises of Julian Steward

A

Economic system as the core of culture.
Cultural ecology and multilinear evolution.

106
Q

Contribution of Julian Steward to Neo-evolutionism - Methodology

A

Relation between man, environment, and economic system. Study of differential environments.

107
Q

Contribution of Julian Steward to Neo-evolutionism - Criticism

A

Critics found direct relationships with environment beyond economic systems.

108
Q

Contribution of Julian Steward to Neo-evolutionism - Conclusion

A

Cultural ecology and multilinear evolution contribute to holistic anthropology.

109
Q

Nature of Evolution (Classical vs Neo Evolution)

A

Classical: Evolution of society and culture.
Neo: Rejuvenation of evolutionary study.

110
Q

Period (Classical vs Neo Evolution)

A

Classical: Middle of the 19th century.
Neo: 3rd decade of the 20th century.

111
Q

Scholars (Classical vs Neo Evolution)

A

Classical: Morgan, Tylor.frazer
Neo: White, Steward, Childe, Sahalin & Service.

112
Q

Evidence (Classical vs Neo Evolution)

A

Classical: Study without evidence. Neo: Study with hard evidence.

113
Q

Data (Classical vs Neo Evolution)

A

Classical: 2nd hand data, conjectural. Neo: First-hand data, no conjecturalism.

114
Q

Diffusion (Classical vs Neo Evolution)

A

Classical: Did not consider diffusion. Neo: Considered diffusion in the study of evolution.

115
Q

Types of Evolution (Classical vs Neo Evolution)

A

Classical: Unilinear.
Neo: Multilinear (Steward), Universal (White & Childe), General and Specific (Sahalin and Service).

116
Q

Cultural Diversity (Classical vs Neo Evolution)

A

Classical: Absent due to unilinear evolution. Neo: Present due to multilinear evolution.

117
Q

Psychic Unity (Classical vs Neo Evolution)

A

Classical: Accepted. Neo: Rejected.

118
Q

Ethnocentrism (Classical vs Neo Evolution)

A

Classical: Victorian society is the highest stage. Neo: Did not explicitly state so.

119
Q

Parallelism (Classical vs Neo Evolution)

A

Classical: Compared contemporary tribal society with prehistoric society.
Neo: Did not use the comparative method of study.

120
Q

Criticism (Classical vs Neo Evolution)

A

Classical: Conjecturalism, psychic unity, lack of cultural diversity. Neo: Individual scholars criticized (e.g., White for macro-culturalism, Steward for ignoring the environment).

121
Q

Classical Evolutionism

A

Gradual change from simple to complex
. Applies to cultural traits, institutions, or whole cultures.
Ceaseless process.
Anthropologist traces origin and sequence of evolution.

122
Q

Neo-evolutionism

A

Shares premises with classical evolutionism.
Focuses on rejuvenation of evolutionary study.
Combines synchronic and diachronic approaches.

123
Q

Differences between Classical Evolutionism and Neo-evolutionism

A

Nature of Evolution: Classical - Evolution of society and culture. Neo - Rejuvenation of evolutionary study. Period: Classical - Middle of the 19th century. Neo - 3rd decade of the 20th century. Scholars: Classical - Morgan, Tylor. Neo - White, Steward, Childe, Sahalin & Service. Evidence: Classical - Study without evidence. Neo - Study with hard evidence. Data: Classical - 2nd hand data, conjectural. Neo - First-hand data, no conjecturalism. Diffusion: Classical - Did not consider diffusion. Neo - Considered diffusion in the study of evolution. Types of Evolution: Classical - Unilinear. Neo - Multilinear (Steward), Universal (White & Childe), General and Specific (Sahalin and Service). Cultural Diversity: Classical - Absent due to unilinear evolution. Neo - Present due to multilinear evolution. Psychic Unity: Classical - Accepted. Neo - Rejected. Ethnocentrism: Classical - Victorian society is the highest stage. Neo - Did not explicitly state so. Parallelism: Classical - Compared contemporary tribal society with prehistoric society. Neo - Did not use the comparative method of study. Criticism: Classical - Conjecturalism, psychic unity, lack of cultural diversity. Neo - Individual scholars criticized (e.g., White for macro-culturalism, Steward for ignoring the environment).

124
Q

Cultural Materialism Definition

A

Cultural Materialism: Change in culture is driven by changes in the material life of people. Developed by Marvin Harris in ‘The Rise of Anthropological Theories’ (1968).

125
Q

Historical Background cm

A

Reaction against cultural relativism, idealism, and structuralism. Aims to create a pan-human science of society based on logical and evidential grounds.

126
Q

Basic Premises of Cultural Materialism

A

Focus on explaining sociocultural change based on changes in material culture. Production and reproduction dominate other cultural sectors. Example: Women’s role in post-World War II USA.

127
Q

Methodology of Cultural Materialism

A

Focuses on observable and quantifiable entities and events
. Studies organizational aspects of politics, economy, and ideological aspects.
Divides socio-cultural system into infrastructure, structure, and superstructure.

128
Q

Infrastructure, Structure, and Superstructure

A

Infrastructure: Technology, practices for resource production.
Structure:Domestic (family structure) and political economy.
Superstructure: Philosophy, art, religion, values.
Changes in infrastructure lead to changes in structure and superstructure.

129
Q

Symbolic Anthropology Definition

A

Symbolic Anthropology: Studies symbols and their interpretation in understanding culture. Emerged as a reaction against structuralism, materialism, and Marxism.

130
Q

Historical Background symbolic

A

Reaction against structuralism, materialism, and Marxism. Symbolic anthropology studies how people understand their surroundings using symbols.

131
Q

Symbolic Anthropology Premises

A

Focuses on symbols and their interpretation in human social life.
Views culture as an independent system of meanings deciphered through symbols.
Major scholars: Geertz, Turner, Schneider.

132
Q

Methodologies of Symbolic Anthropology
clw

A

Cross-cultural comparison.
Literary-based approach over a science-based approach.
Focuses on culture as a whole, not isolated aspects.

133
Q

Accomplishments of Symbolic Anthropology

A

Shifted focus to culture and interpretation.
Studied culture from an emic perspective.
Contributions from Geertz, Turner, and Schneider.

134
Q

Criticism of Symbolic Anthropology

A

Criticized by Marxists for not explaining the system of symbolism.
Accused of being too subjective and scientifically untestable.
Defended by symbolic anthropologists against accusations from cultural ecologists.

135
Q

E.B. Tylor
bfc pe

A

British anthropologist, Father of British anthropology, Curator in London Museum, Pioneer in systematic study of anthropology, Evolutionism in Anthropology (E.B. Tylor)

136
Q

Classical evolutionism
oet

A

Origin of religion, Animism, totemism, polytheism, monotheism
, Evolution of plough,
Three-stage classification of society (savagery, barbarism, civilization)

137
Q

Origin of Religion (E.B. Tylor)

A

Primitive Culture, Animism, Dream-death experiences, Totemism, Criticisms of Tylor’s theory

138
Q

Evolution of Plough (E.B. Tylor)

A

Plough evolution from digging stick

139
Q

Contributions other than Evolution (E.B. Tylor)

dgcs

A

Definition of Culture, Gustav Clamn, Culture as a complex whole, Social transmission of culture

140
Q

Linking Happiness with Montesquieu’s Classification (E.B. Tylor)

A

Three-stage classification of society, Savagery, barbarism, civilization, Happiness and moral qualities

141
Q

Role in Use of Statistics in Anthropology (E.B. Tylor)

A

Statistical studies, Comparative study of 282 societies, Correlation between institutions, ‘Adhesion’ in relationships

142
Q

Other Contributions (E.B. Tylor)
wsc

A

First theory of why incest is prohibited,
Importance of statistical studies,
Claude Levi Strauss’s development of Tylor’s theory

143
Q

Conclusion (E.B. Tylor)

A

Tylor’s significant contributions, Widely accepted definition of culture, Criticisms notwithstanding