anthropological theories Flashcards
L. H. Morgan - Contribution to Evolutionary Study
American lawyer, Classical evolutionary thinker
Lewis Henry Morgan made significant contributions to evolutionary study. Here are five heading phrases summarizing his contributions:
- Social Evolution: Evolutionary Stages in Human Societies
- Kinship and Descent Systems: Comparative Analysis
- Cultural Anthropology: Ethnographic Methodology
- Material Culture: Technological Development
- Theoretical Framework: Evolutionary Progression
Evolution of Kinship Terminology (L. H. Morgan)book
Title: \System of Consanguinity and Affinities of Human Family" (1871)
Evolution of Whole/Entire Society (L. H. Morgan book
Title: \Ancient Society" (1877)
Evolution of Marriage (Family) (L. H. Morgan)
pcp spm
Stages: Promiscuity, Consanguinous marriage, Punaluan marriage, Syndasmian marriage, Patriarchal marriage, Monogamous marriage
Evolution of Political Organization (L. H. Morgan)
Types: Societus (political system dependent on kinship),
Civitus (political system independent of kinship)
Criticism of Morgan’s Contributions
Critiques: Conjecturalism, Secondary data,
Achievement: Some approximating field work
Contribution of Frazer to Classical Evolutionism
James Frazer: English anthropologist, Works: \Golden Bough" and "Totemism and Exogamy"”
Evolution of Science (Frazer)
Sequence: Magic -> Religion -> Science
Theory of Totemism (Frazer)BOOK
Works: \Golden Bough"
Impact and Criticism of Frazer
Impact: Evolutionist in the 20th century, Critique: Lack of significant impact due to discrediting of evolution
Criticism of Classical Evolutionism
Critiques: Lack of proper data, Ignorance of other processes of social change (e.g., diffusion), Conjecturalism
Criticisms by Westermarck family
Specific Critique: Monogamy and nuclear families in simple societies
Criticisms by Franz Boas
Critiques: Lack of data collection, Introduction of fieldwork tradition, Empirical approach in anthropology
Criticisms by Diffusionists
Critiques: Neglect of diffusion as a way of cultural change, Neglect of human invention and creativity
Criticisms by Functionalism
-
Marxism:
- Ignores class struggle and economic inequalities
- Overlooks exploitation and power imbalances
-
Symbolic Interactionism:
- Neglects individual agency and micro-level interactions
- Too deterministic, ignoring subjective experiences
-
Feminism:
- Fails to address gender inequalities and patriarchy
- Overlooks women’s roles and experiences
-
Postmodernism:
- Overemphasizes stability, ignoring fluid and fragmented social realities
- Too rigid and fails to account for diversity and multiplicity of perspectives
-
Conflict Theory:
- Ignores ongoing societal conflicts and tensions
- Overlooks the role of power struggles in shaping society
Criticisms Against Psychic Unity
Critique: Lack of proof for the theory of psychic unity of mankind
Criticisms Against Comparative Method
Critique: Equating contemporary primitive societies with prehistoric societies
Criticisms Related to Victorian Society
Critique: Considering Victorian society as the highest stage of development (ethnocentrism)
Criticisms Against Progressive Evolution
Critique: Evolution as change rather than progressive or retrogressive
Historical Particularism of Boas - Franz Boas
Developed historical particularism, Criticized ethnocentrism of evolutionism
Premises of Historical Particularism (Boas)
odd ur mg
Overcoming empirical problems,
Detailed regional studies,
Discovering distribution of cultural traits,
Understanding individual processes of cultural change,
Reconstructing histories,
Meticulous collection and organization of ethnographic data,
Generalizing about cultural development after gathering information on particulars
Methodology of Historical Particularism (Boas)
Studying local history, Long stay with local people, Learning local language
Nature of Historical Particularism
Approach to understanding the nature of culture and change in a particular culture, Emphasis on data collection before making assumptions or interpretations
Data Collection in Historical Particularism
Recording oral history tradition, Participant observation
Accomplishments of Historical Particularism (Boas)
Importance of data collection, Fieldwork studies
Criticism of Historical Particularism (Boas)
Reluctance to generate broad theories of cultural development, Questioning the point of gathering detailed data without broader theoretical frameworks
Emergence and Reaction to Classical Evolutionism - Similarities
Both British and German schools emerged as reactions to classical evolutionism.
Criticized classical evolutionism for neglecting societal change.
Diffusion and Evolution Relationship - Similarities
Both schools asserted that diffusion and evolution are interconnected processes. Common Premises: Unequal inventiveness of the human mind. Displacement of people for better opportunities leading to cultural contact and diffusion.
Nature of Diffusion - Differences
British School (Extreme Diffusionism): Led by Smith, Perry, and Rivers’ school. Emphasized extreme diffusionism.
German School (Multiple Centers of Diffusionism): Advocated multiple centers of diffusionism. Recognized various sources of origin.
Source of Cultural Diffusion - Differences
British School (Single Source of Origin): Smith and Perry proposed a single source of origin.
German School (Multiple Sources of Origin): Rivers suggested multiple sources for cultural diffusion.
Criteria for Diffusion - Differences
British School (No Criteria): Did not establish specific criteria for diffusion.
German School (Criteria of Forms and Quantity): Considered both forms and quantity as criteria for diffusion.
Objectives of Diffusionism - Differences
British School (Show and Trace Path of Diffusion): Aimed to show and trace the unfettered path of diffusion from the center to various parts of the world.
German School (Demonstrate Occurrence of Diffusion): Focused on demonstrating the occurrence of diffusion.
Attention to Cultural Aspects - Differences diffusion school
British School (only Material Culture): Emphasized material culture and neglected non-material culture.
German School (Both Material and Non-Material Culture): Paid attention to both material and non-material aspects of culture.
Typology of Diffusion - Differences
British School (No Typology): Did not establish a typology of diffusion.
German School (Distinction between Types): Made a distinction between direct/primary and indirect/secondary diffusion.
Relationship with Evolution - Differences
British School (Isolation): Gave importance to the evolution and diffusion of culture in isolation.
German School (Integration): Attempted to integrate evolution with the diffusion of cultural traits. Addressed sociocultural change from simple to complex and discussed the diffusion of cultural traits.
American School of Diffusionism in Anthropology - Historical Background
Boas & Wissler. Influence and Link with German School.
Rejection of Morgan’s Three-Stage Classification
Boas and Wissler rejected Morgan’s three-stage classification of savagery, barbarism, and civilization.
Influenced by German museum methodology, they classified cultural elements from the same geographic region together.
Development of Culture Area Concept
Cultural items of American Indian tribes living close to each other were found to be more similar
. The concept of ‘Culture Area’ emerged from this observation, first used by O. T. Mason.
Further developed by Clark Wissler, attributing similarities in culture areas to diffusion.
Premises/Features of Culture Area - Definition of Culture Area
A geographical zone with several groups living together, showing cultural similarity when grouped together.
Premises/Features of Culture Area - Culture Centre
Each culture area has a central point called ‘Culture Centre’ with the greatest concentration of culture. Culture Centre controls the entire area politically, socially, and in terms of economy, politics, and religion.
Premises/Features of Culture Area - Diffusion from Culture Centre
Cultural traits spread centrifugally from the Culture Centre. Traits are not diffused within the same area but spread from one culture area to another.
Premises/Features of Culture Area - Greatest Concentration of Traits
Culture Centre is where the greatest concentration of cultural traits exists in their pristine form.
Construction of Culture Area: Food as Criterion - Basis for Constructing Culture Area
Food as a criterion for constructing Culture Area.
Each American Indian tribe, having its own myth of origin, inhabits a specific eco-zone.
Construction of Culture Area: Food as Criterion - Wissler’s Food Areas and Culture Areas
bg ce sn wc me iiwsp
Wissler used food as a criterion and identified 6 Food Areas corresponding to Culture Areas:
Bison: Great Plains,
Caribou: Eskimos,
Salmon fish: North Pacific Coast to Plateau,
Wild seed: California,
Maize: Eastern part of America,
Intensive agriculture: Indian group of Western America, South West America, Peru
Technology and Environment
People exploit their environment with technology. Technology is invented based on the driving force of their environment, especially concerning food.
Cultural Evolution - Definition
Process of social and cultural change from simple to complex, moving from homogeneity to heterogeneity.
Cultural Evolution - Nature
More complicated compared to Cultural Diffusion.
Cultural Evolution - Process
Occurs by alteration, invention, or diffusion of cultural elements. Evolution may or may not aid diffusion.
Cultural Evolution - Nature of evolution
To change existing simpler items and complexes in a society to a more complex order.
Cultural Diffusion - Definition
Process where cultural elements, complexes, and aspects pass from one group to another.
Cultural Diffusion - Nature
Simple in nature compared to Cultural Evolution.
Cultural Diffusion - Process
Occurs only by borrowing of cultural elements. Diffusion definitely aids evolution.
Cultural Diffusion - Result
Adds more new items to a culture or society.
Bronislaw Malinowski - Theory
Biocultural/Psychological Functionalism.
Bronislaw Malinowski -studied influencedby
Studied Australian aborigines. Influenced by Golden Bough.
Bronislaw Malinowski - Premises
Individual needs,
hierarchy of needs,
importance to culture.
Bronislaw Malinowski - Methodology
Biological and integrative needs.