13.1 situattional influences on behaviour Flashcards
social psychology
how other ppl influence what we think, feel, and do
we must be aware that our thoughts feelings and actions are often determined by other ppl
we would like to assume that others could never influence us to cause harm to others or do anything that would violate our ethics
there are decent people that can be influenced to engage in hurtful actions towards other ppl
situational factors that influences the abuse of prisoners at abu ghraib
- by definition, prisoners have a lower status than the ppl guarding them and they are presumably there as punishment for doing something wrong
- there was very little supervision of gaurds behaviour
- a number of the americans working within the prison were not members of the military, so they were not as accountable to higher level authorities
- the use of the prison occurred in the context of a ware in which US soldiers were overstressed, overworked, and considered their lived to be in danger from Iraqi citizens
- cultural and language diffs bw guards and prisoners encourages racist attitudes and Us vs them thinking
- higher level authorities frequently changed the rules about what were acceptable limits when interrogating prisoners and pressured personnel inside the prison to used aggressive means to get info from detainees
kurt lewin
behaviour is a function of the person and the environment
mimicry
we have an unconscious tendency to engages in actions, emotional reactions and facial expressions that we observed in other people
this tendency allows for transmitting cultural practices and skills from one generation to the next
it also enables us to work cooperatively to achieve goals that we could not accomplish on our own.
the chameleon effect
our genetic disposition to unconsciously copy other ppls actions so that we can establish a comfortable rhythm with them and so we can appear more attractive to ppl that we like and want to get to know better
conformity pressure
engaging in behaviour bc of the actions, encouragement, or insistence of others
social norms combine with conformity pressure to encourage certain behaviours and discourage others
Usually thats a good thing but sometimes these pressures can also result in destruction and violence
group dynamics
the ways in which members of a group can influence the behaviour of other members
-social loafing-
ppl often work less diligently when they are part of a group than when they are on their own.
how to minimize social loafing
1 avoid low efficacy beliefs (the belief by members of the group that they are not capable of reaching their goal)
2 ensure that all group members view each others contributions as valuable
3 ensure that all group members place high value on the outcome of the project
4 ensure that all group members are putting in a strong effort and that they know how hard all of the other members are working
social facilitation
ppl tend to work harder at a task when they are in the presence of other ppl who are performing the same task
although the presnce others can enhance the performance of simple tasks it can make accomplishing complex tasks even more difficult
arousal determines whether the presence of others improves our performance or makes it worse
If the task is simple for us, higher arousal will keep us motivated and we will do better
if the task is difficult higher arousal will drain our energy and distract us
one would think that multiple heads would be better than one , when it comes to creative thinking and generating ideas
..
groupthink
the tendency for groups to discourage a variety of opinions and ideas
negative consequences of groupthink
- group members fail to identify problems or negative aspects of ideas that other influential members have presented
- members of a group may pressure those who are uncertain, because the group comes to value agreement over the quality of their plans/actions
3 overconfidence in the groups decisions/actions and delusions that the group is not capable of error
groupthink is particularly likely when
the group is led y an individual who develops their own plans and beliefs and then discourages disagreement and alternative ideas