williams contemporary (icbt and cbm) Flashcards

1
Q

what was the aim of the study?

A

find out if combined treatment of cognitive biased modification immediately followed by icbt would be effective in treating depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

where were participants recruited from?

A

applied research unit for anxiety and depression in sydney

online screenings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how many applied through online screenings?

A

232

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what happened to successful applicants?

A

they were rang for a diagnostic interview using the mini

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the mini?

A

multi international neuropsychiatric interview

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

why were participants excluded?

A

no internet access, drug abuse and suicidal idealisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how many participnats met all inclusion criteria and what disorder did they have?

A

69 and major depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how many were in the intervention group at the start and then the finish?

A

38 and 20

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how many were in the control group at the start and finish?

A

31 and 22

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

who many participants were in the baseline questionnaires in both groups?

A

I-35 C-28

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how long was the treatment?

A

11 weeks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how long was the cbm?

A

one week

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how long was the icbt?

A

ten weeks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was the criteria for participants?

A

had to have major depression

no history of psychotic mental illness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what age did participants have to be between?

A

18-65

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what was depression severity measured by?

A
  • beck depression inventory 2nd edition

- phq-9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what were the primary outcome measures?

A

severity of depression
distress
interpretation bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what is the phq-9?

A

nine item depression scale of patient health questionnaire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

how was distress measured?

A

k10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what is the k10

A

measures distress

ten item kestrel psychological distress scale

21
Q

how was interpretation bias measured?

22
Q

what is the sst

A

measures interpretation bias

scrambled sentence test

23
Q

what were the secondary outcome measures?

A

other factors associated with depression that may affect treatment such as anxiety

24
Q

what was anxiety as a second outcome measured by?

25
what is STAI-A?
state trait anxiety inventory trait version
26
what is cbm?
computerised training programme individuals presented with ambiguous scenarios that are always resolved in a positive manner
27
what was the final measure used?
researchers used their own adapted version of treatment expectancy and outcomes questionnaire
28
after intervention group had post scores what happened?
control group took part
29
what measure was not carried out in post treatment outcomes?
interpretation bias
30
results: what were there no significant differences in?
baseline measures pre treatment
31
what percentage had social phobias in each group? (baseline measure)
I-34% C-25%
32
what was found in the treatment expectancy out outcomes questionnaire?
there were no differences in patients ratings of treatment expectations
33
what did intervention group show? (results)
improvement in scores on all measures
34
which group had most improvement?
intervention group
35
what were some conclusions?
combined intervention effective in reducing depressive symptoms icbm can reduce symptoms in just one week useful to intergrate cbmi into icbt as a new form of delivery treatment
36
why was the internet recruitment a strength? (S)
allowed to collect a broad sample from all over australia
37
why is it useful? (S)
cbt was not widely used due to resources | encourages the integration of internet based technologies to treat depression
38
ethics? (S)
all 69 gave informed consent before went through a screening process to make sure ppts suitable for treatment right to withdraw
39
random assignment? (S)
reduces any bias of ppts characteristics
40
reliability?(S)
easily replicable standardised procedure questionnaires
41
use of interviews and questionnaires? (S)
didn't just reply on one type of data collection method, increased validity
42
self report data? (S)
quick and easy comparison to be made | reduces costs of manpower needed
43
who was the study approved by? (S)
human rights ethics committee of st vin cents hospital in sydney
44
self report data? (W)
social desirability | lack validity
45
cause and effect? (W)
results could not establish whether change was due to one programme or both
46
generalisability? (W)
inclusion data | 18-65
47
validity of withdrawal? (W)
may not have worked on those who withdrew
48
long term? (W)
no follow up study so no way to tell | may relapse §
49
what % of people in both groups showed changes?
I - 65% | C - 35%