Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Human Motivation > Week 4 > Flashcards

Week 4 Flashcards

0
Q

Why watch tv, y so difficult to stop

A

Average tv watching 4 hours.

More execute more guilt you feel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Tv

A

But today, we do other things to waste time.

Surf web, fb. Etc. hehe screen size looking up, but need break.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Understand flow conept and ESM
Understand experin decline tv watching
Goal for watch less tv?

A

Ok

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Finding flow book

A

Mihaliy ted talk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Nova Scotia,

A

Guys, surf in jNuray in Nova Scotia,
Show danger no reward, but experience flow so do it over.
Doing going love to do, caries along by current. = flow.
Phenomenology experienced. Learning, listening.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Emergent in. Doing activity, motivation intrinsic

A

Not to get paid, or social currency, but do it anyway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Components of flow (6)

A

Effortless action, stand out in life.
Games sports etc facilitate flow. Because they often have these components.
–Clarity of goals
–Immediate feedback
–Challenges and skills are matched, can increase togethor
–Absorbed in the task
–Sense of personal control
–Altered sense of time, faster or slower like a 5 second action feeling longer.

Cicasa,
Worst experiences are those when self conscious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Become more complex more flow we have.

Measured by interviews and novel method.

A

ESM. 10 times a day. What doing and experiences were
Take variable and look at it fluctuations.
Use ex. Dramatic fluctuations,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How often and hwhen do we report something like flow?

A 
Plot skill and challenge, 
Low = apathy
Skill high, challenge low = bored
Challenge high skill low = anxious
Challenge and skill high leads to flow. 
Sports and hobbies often get to this.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Leisure vs work study
Paradox of work and leisure
Why?

A

Think leisure is more likely flow.
Surprisingly during leisure activities only reported flow 20% of a time! challenge an skill gig.
At work high challenge and high skill 60% of the time.
Therefore, 3x more common at work!
Paradox of work and leisure

Why?
Leisure means watching tv! Activity least likely to be associate with flow. Comparable to staring up at ceiling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Negative about tv,

A

Wasting leisure time

Work is good for us more challenge and develop more skills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Tv caPtialiIzes on

A

Orienting response, changing stimuli. Cutting, hypnotic.
Antithesis of flow experience.
Significantly more relaxed watching tv. Blah experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Compare reding vs tv

A

Reading is mcu mer fulfilling,
Cheerful and relaxed still.
More potent. More concentration. More skill.

Consecutive reports. Tv becomes worse and worse the longer you do it! Eusing is the OPPOSITE

Reading more optimal experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Class stats

A

Tv displaced by internet.
Is it pretty much like tv, or like reading.
Well reading I do, but ideo waiting like others or fb probably is like tv.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Mihaliy suggest drawn to tv

A

Hypnotized by orienting, and natural state of mind without structure or goal is CHAOS
Depressed and anxious if let mind wander. Tv easy fat structure. Mind.

So other activities demand more from us, so we should do them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

K counter Miley tv parasite idea

A
  1. It’s ok doing it with others
    Rating are more positive, benefit. But true for ANY activity
  2. Life is stressful, helps relax and recuperate.
    Nun & uni prof, least stress.
    Don’t watch more tv if tough day. It’s habitual
    Time series analysis, challenge of day has no influence, nor how aroused or active! Happy sad either
    Relaxation post tv, drops, keep with socail leisure activity. Therefore tv becomes like addiction, negatively conditioned. Temporary fix, rebound effect. Therefore relax is a myth.
    In other cultures, other activities are flow recuperating from long day. Active flow producing activities.
  3. It’s ok if you watch good shows
    Show did not effect experience according to mihaliy
    But, shows have become more complex and reached a golden age, can actually make you smarter.
16
Q

Watching tv make you smarter, but

A

Textual analysis, shows are more complex generally.

Bunk theere is also cognitive junk.

Single complex thread or complex network. So survivor ok.

Therefore it’s possible now to watch shows more challenging

17
Q

Recommendatns

A

Don’t try to give up tv, internet, youtube.
Watch with other people
Be a discriminating viewer, gaol oriented, not more than an hour. Plan using TV guide. Similar to internet and blogs maybe.

18
Q

Computer mediated activities

A

Internet surfing
Ritualistic (low flow and stimulation)
Instrumental (goal oriented, good, very different)
Social networking” potentially valuable, passive or active? No different from checking in with tv characters

Video games, addictive issue, antisocial too.
Email

Stealing cars, and fighting in war, flow activity,

19
Q

How did tiger woods become the best golfer in history.

A

Expert performance.
Focused on achievement goals.

Arguable q,

20
Q

Consider ability vs expert in achieving goals and

A

Unique importance of deliberate practise.

Ericsson research.

21
Q

Class survey,

A

Surprised, how talented,
85% other area! at expert or elite level.
Sport, music, fine arts, language arts.

Began age 8 8 hours a week.
Music for me, yup.

Natural ability vs effort. .
45% natural, 55% effort modest.

Research challenges belief. Natural portion is 0%

22
Q

Film clips

A

Highly achievement motivation, excellence
K good ball sports using hands, not soccer.
Tiger, prodigy, basket ball.

Think about our abilities and make comparisons with others.

23
Q

Expert perforamnce, what is it

A

Consistant,

Specific goals instant feedback, comparable.

Certain domains we don’t stop to measure expertise.
Carefully look at perforam and see it s not true.
Wine connoisseurs no better than chance.
Question domains and test expert in controlled conditions.
Hard to evaluate psychology, outcomes over long period.

24
Q

K favorite summer activity

A

Golf,
Unique to gold, cler standards of excellence.
Par is excellence, feast to eval expert.
Tiger, high level. Video.

25
Q

Tiger woods

A

14 major championships.
Tiger average 69, on par 71. Highest career earnings

Young tiger, touch feel better.
First impression natural gift.

26
Q

Role of talent and motivation in expert perforamcne

A

Traditional view, , god giftedness
Most common current view, due to genetic endowment.
Both innate.
Few make it to professional level.
Assume natural talent, max out effort, distinguish natural talent.

Perforamcne = ability x effortless

27
Q

Howard Gardners theory of multiple intelligence

A

7 intelligences biologically based, vary, normal distribution on abilities

Linguistic verbal creative writer
Logistic mathematical engineer
Education focus almost exclusively on on these types of intelligence!

Spatial architects
Musical
Bodily kin esthetic dance

Last two need for psychologists, think about them, asses
Interpersonal, understanding other ppl, them and togethor
Intrapersonal using yourself as a model to understand others, wow super high on this. Other not as much. Interesting.

Independant of another re berm

Note naturalistic intelligence, and existential intelligence too added
These can be assessed. 15 kids picture talk about relax of friends groups clicks. Hierarchy later in life added.

28
Q

Education can do what

A

Satisfied and operant,
Succeed, leads to being pledge professor. Less time rank and identify natural competency and gift,
Ways to succeed and at abilities. Nature approach, nurture.
Hmm match people at unknown skill level! Cultivated or not, in therapy, as for taking holistic view on treatment. .

Ericsson disagrees. Completely.

29
Q

Evidence for talent view

A

Focus on performance of prodigies, neuro anatomical gift.
Q: future success? and background exposure, encouragement teaching duration and intentisty specific skill related taks etc
Many prodig burn out. Mso performers not child prodigies.

Perforamnce of savants, below average abilities autism, brilliant in narrow area. Preset programming. Neurobiological.

Spel ability linked to being an expert.
Ex. Perfect pitch.
Visual spatial memory of chess players.

30
Q

Wesly chu

A

Prodigy, canaidan but Asian
Natural intel?
Well enviro, had piano at home, parents music teachers. Got encouragement, challenge drills. Absolute pitch
Future success.
Super piano brothers, two other kids re now aheD of him. In competition.

Sophie, piano get away. Lol

Few prodigies make it to adult maintaing success. Chu will likely succeed now being 22

31
Q

Prodigies background

A

Parents often involvedeldmen, gift
Early interest passion for music, not necessarily skill. Ericsson

Wesley keen interest, engagement practise fueled.

32
Q

Tiger woods story

A

Father crazy, good rela,
MKe tiger greatest godfer.
6 months, into garage hit balls into net. 1-2 hours watch.
Golf club, swing perfect imitation.
Driving range, golf course, too young.
Beat owner bigger. 6 gf course each dY. 8 swing coach.
Sports psych at 10!
Compete, parents dedicTed lives. Ha not for me performance.

Train child b4 seld conscious.

33
Q

Perforam of savants

A

Early intense exposure and training was seen in prodigy but for savant.
Repetition help you learn.
K ADHD camp, stick things houses carpenter, parents tools and wood. Obsessive kid. Savant, explain perforamnce, early extensive repetitive training.

34
Q

Superior basic abilities

A

Ericsson debunk other ones. Weak evidence for natural talent.
Early training, intense blah blah.

Absolute pitch, music training young, 
 critical period 3-5. 
 Asian language family more likely. 
 Musicianship no relation to per pitch
  Still some debate

Chess players.
Against 50, wins 47 blindfolded! Hippocampus special?
Ericsson says, non specific to chess, no good, random, no good. Only when in meaningful alignment, chess player has advantGe.
More played,more deliberate practise, greater cognitive structures to allow you to do complex linkages and complex patters.
Not innate, results of practise. Basic ability no diff, specific imp.

Human Motivation (17 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions