Week 22: Personality Flashcards

1
Q

Agreeableness

A

personality trait that reflects a person’s tendency to be compassionate, cooperative, warm, caring; people low in this tend to be rude, hostile, and to care more about themselves than others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Conscientiousness

A

a personality trait that reflects a person’s tendency to be careful, organized, hardworking, to follow rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Continuous distributions

A

characteristics can go from low-high, w all different intermediate values possible; one doesn’t simply have the trait/not have it, they can have varying amounts of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Extraversion

A

personality trait that reflects a person’s tendency to be sociable, outgoing, active, assertive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Facets

A

broad personality traits can be broken down into narrower facets/aspects of the trait; ex. extraversion has several facets, like sociability, dominance, risk-taking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Factor Analysis

A

statistical technique for grouping similar things together according to how highly they’re associated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

HEXACO Model

A

alternative to the Factor-Five model; includes six traits, five of which are variants of traits included in the Big Five:
H - honesty-humility (unique to hexaco)
E - emotionality
X - extraversion
A - agreeableness
C - conscientiousness
O - openness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Independent

A

two characteristics/traits separate from one another - a person can be high on one and low on the other, vice-versa; some correlated traits relatively independent in that although there’s a tendency for a person high on one to also be high on the other (not always the case)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Lexical Hypothesis

A

idea that the most important differences between people will be encoded in the language that we use to describe people; if we want to know which personality traits are most important, we can look to the language that people use to describe themselves/others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Neuroticism

A

personality trait that reflects the tendency to be interpersonally sensitive, and the tendency to experience negative emotions like anxiety, fear, sadness, anger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Openness to Experience

A

personality trait that reflects a person’s tendency to seek out/to appreciate new things, including thoughts, feelings, values, experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Personality

A

enduring predispositions that characterize a person, like styles of thought, feelings, behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

personality traits

A

enduring dispositions in behaviour that show differences across people, and which tend to characterize the person across varying types of situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Person-situation debate

A

historical debate about the relative power of personality traits as compared to situational influences on behaviour; situationist critique, which started the person-situation debate, suggested that people overestimate the extent to which personality traits are consistent across situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

absolute stability

A

consistency in the level or amount of a personality attribute over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Active person-environment transactions

A

when people actively choose/change parts of their environment to fit their needs/desires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Age effects

A

differences in personality between groups of different ages that are related to maturation and development instead of birth cohort differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Attraction

A

a connection between personality attributes and aspects of the environment that occurs because individuals w particular traits are drawn to certain environments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Attrition

A

when people stop participating in a group/job/study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Birth cohort

A

people born in a particular year/span of time

21
Q

Cohort effects

A

differences in personality that are related to historical/social factors unique to individuals born in a particular year

22
Q

Corresponsive principle

A

the idea that personality traits often become matched w environmental conditions such that an individual’s social context acts to accentuate and reinforce their personality attributes

23
Q

Cross-sectional study/design

A

a research design that uses a group of individuals w different ages (and birth cohorts) assessed at a single point in time

24
Q

cumulative continuity principle

A

the generalization that personality attributes show increasing stability w age/experience

25
differential stability
consistency in the rank-ordering of personality across two/more measurement occasions
26
Evocative person-environment transactions
when who you are/how you act causes others/your surroundings to respond in a certain way; friendly person might evoke warm responses in another
27
Group level
focus on summary statistics that apply to aggregates of people when studying personality development; ex. is considering whether the average score of a group of 50 year olds is higher than the average score of a group of 21 year olds when considering a trait like conscientiousness
28
Heterotypic stability
consistency in the underlying psychological attribute across development regardless of any changes in how the attribute is expressed at different ages
29
Homotypic stability
consistency of the exact same thoughts, feelings, behaviours across development
30
Hostile attribution bias
the tendency of some individuals to interpret ambiguous social cues and interactions as examples of aggressiveness, disrespect, or antagonism
31
Individual level
a focus on individual level stats that reflect whether individuals show stability/change when studying personality development
32
Manipulation
when someone uses their personality traits (like being outgoing/controlling) to adjust the things/environment around them
33
Maturity principle
the generalization that personality attributes associated w the sucesful fulfillment of adult roles increase w age/experience
34
Person-environment transactions
the interplay between individuals and their contextual circumstances that ends up shaping both personality/environment
35
Reactive person-environment transactions
when people react to what's happening around them, like adjusting their behaviour based on the environment they're in
36
Selection
a connection between personality attributes and aspects of the environment that occurs whenever individuals w particular attributes choose particular kinds of environments
37
Stress reaction
the tendency to become easily distressed by the normal challenges of life
38
Transformation
the term for personality changes associated w experience/life events
39
Big Five
5 broad general traits that are included in many prominent models of personality: 1. neuroticism 2. extraversion 3. openness to expeirence 4. agreeableness 5. conscientiousness
40
Honeymoon effect
tendency for newly married individuals to rate their spouses in an unrealistically positive manner; represents a specific manifestation of the letter of recommendation effect when applied to ratings made by current romantic partners; illustrates the very important role played by relationship satisfaction in ratings made by romantic partners: as marital satisfaction declines, the effect disappears
41
High-stakes testing
settings in which test scores are used to make important decisions about individuals; ex. test scores for college, tests in forensic settings
42
Implicit motives
these are goals that are important to a person, but that they cannot consciously express; because individual can't verbalize goals directly, cannot be easily assessed via self-report; can be measured using Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
43
Letter of recommendation effect
the general tendency for informants in personlaity studies to rate others in an unrealistically positive manner; tendency is due a pervasive bias in personality assessment: in the large majority of published studies, informants are people who like the person they are rating (ex. often friends/family) and therefore are motivated to depict them in a socially desirable way; term reflects a similar tendency for academic letters of recommendation to be overly positive and to present the referent in an unrealistically desirable manner
44
Projective hypothesis
the theory that when people are confronted w ambiguous stimuli, their responses will be influenced by their unconscious thoughts, needs, wishes, impulses; in turn based on the Freudian notion of projection, which is the idea that people attribute their own undesirable/unacceptable characteristics to other people/objects
45
reference group effect
the tendency of people to base their self-concept on comparisons w others
46
Reliability
consistency of test scores across repeated assessments
47
Self-enhancement bias
the tendency for people to see and/or present themselves in an overly favourable way; tendency can take two basic forms; defensiveness and impression management; informants also can show enhancement biases; general form of this bias has been called the letter-of-recommendation effect, which is the tendency of informants who like the person they're rating (ex. friends, relatives) to describe them in an overly favourable way
48
Sibling contrast affect
the tendency of parents to use their perceptions of all of their children as a frame of reference for rating the characteristics of each of them; more generally, the effect causes parents to exaggerate the true extent of differences between their kids; effect represents a specific manifestation of the more general reference group effect when applied to ratings made by parents