Unit 4 Important Info Flashcards
describe the beliefs of an irreconcilable historian
cause of civil war is primarily slavery
slavery was a huge issue, and differences in thought around it made the civil war inevitable
north is clearly motivated by antislavery
abraham lincon was a necessary figure
describe the beliefs of a revisionist historian
civil war was not bound to happen
north and south actually agreed mostly on racial stuff
slavery was not a major cause of the civil war
fanatics on both sides led war, not representative of public opinion
describe manifest destiny: who, what, when, what influenced it
john o sullivan coined term
idea that us should take over north american continent
used as intellectual justification for westward expansion
influenced by puritan thought, romanticism, jefferson and jacksonian democracies
describe how tyler was viewed in office. what were some of his political beliefs, and what were the immediate effects of them? give dates too
1841-1845
doesn’t really align with whig party who voted him in
succession after harrison died was unclear so people kind of resent him
opposed american system + vetoes bank and tariffs
result: kicked out of whig party, democrats don’t want him either
cabinet resigns
describe the webster-ashburton treaty: what, where, when, why
1842
confirms us canada border in northeast
us gains mesabi range in missouri, where there is lots of coal and iron
caused by dispute over aroostook territory in northern maine
describe the controversy over the oregon territory under tyler
americans are settling there
BUT both the us and uk claim the territory -> calls for war!!
describe the controversy over the texas region under tyler.
us settlers invited to settle in texas region after mexico gains their independence
they were told to be catholic and not bring slaves but they do the opposite -> rebellion
texas republic forms. not strong enough on own so want to be annexed by us
BUT WAIT!! they would be a slave state and that would upset the balance in senate!!
describe who was on both sides of the controversy over the texas region under tyler
in favor:
- tyler
- jc calhoun
- cotton whigs
- southern democrats
against:
- conscience whigs
- northern democrats
How did the controversy over the texas region under tyler influence the whig party?
divisions!!
northerners = conscience whigs - scared of expansion of slavery
- some are abolitionists, some want western territory free for white people
southerners = cotton whigs, pro-slavery
what is the tyler-texas treaty? (what, when, why, significance)
1844
proposed treaty to add texas to union without balancing it out
result of controversy over texas region, tyler is pro adding texas
shut down in congress by conscience whigs and northern democrats
describe the election of 1844
main topic is the annexation of texas
whigs: clay
- informally agrees to not talk about texas / slavery
democrats: james k polk
- ally of andrew jackson
- loves western expansion
- promises to annex texas
- and annex oregon “54’40” or fight!!”
- and annex california
liberty party: james g birney
- in favor of abolition!
liberty party takes enough votes from whigs to make democrats (james k polk) win!
describe tyler’s lame duck
period between a new president being elected (polk) and them being inaugurated
during this time, tyler convinces everyone to annex texas in exchange for creating the free state of wisconsin
describe foreign policy relating to the oregon territory under polk (what, why, significance)
drops the 54’40” or fight :(
negotiates with british for a lower parallel
wants to focus on expansion in south, not fighting wars in north
causes sectionalism, alienates northern democrats
describe the lead up to the us sending troops into contested territory with mexico
john slidell’s mission - polk attempts to buy cailfornia from mexico, but is denied because mexico is mad over texas
more minor issue: us doesn’t like catholics
border is unclear between newly us texas territory and mexico
- mexico recognizes border as nueces river
- us recognizes it as rio grande (further into mexican territory)
describe the major event causing the mexican-american war in the short term.
polk sents troops to rio grande (territory claimed by both us and mexico)
mexico fires on us + kills 16 americans
How did different people feel about potentially declaring war on mexico (mexican american war?)
mostly everyone thinks we should declare war
- democrats unified in favor of war
whigs are divided
- northerners don’t want to potentially add more slave states but don’t want to be seen as unpatriotic (think of what happened to the federalists) so they mostly vote in favor
some opponents including abraham lincoln
- spot resolution - “the blood was actually spilt on disputed territory. polk sent our guys in there on purpose to start a war”
what is the spot resolution?
argument by abraham lincoln
the blood was spilt in disputed territory! polk literally did this on purpose
what were the years of the mexican american war
1846-1848
what were some of the major results of the mexican american war
rise of important political figures (of course)
- grant, lee, jackson, sherman, taylor, fremont
us gets lots of territory in mexican cession
displays the power of us to europe (first war won without their help!)
relations with latin america get worse
describe the debates over how to make a treaty with mexico after the mexican american war
polk: i want all of mexico!
whigs + some dems: no thats ridiculous we only need some
- some dems dont want too much land because they dont like mexicans, north don’t like it because they don’t want more slave states
- whigs are dominant in house so polk has to settle
describe the treaty of guadalupe-hidalgo
1848
nicholas trist
establishes how much land us gets from mexico in mexican cession
- texas border at rio grande
us gets a bunch of land in exchange for $15 million
describe the wilmot proviso
1846
david wilmot
what north wants with mexican cession - no slavery
we want the territory to be open for white settlers
upset that we didn’t get all of oregon
doesn’t pass
describe the calhoun memorandum
what south wants with mexican cession - new territories open to slavery (popular sovereignty)
based on 5th amendment - government can’t interfere with private property
how do the north and south disagree on what to do with the mexican cession?
north: wilmot proviso - no slavery in mexican cession
south: calhoun memorandum - there should be popular sovereignty there