Understanding and Apply Scrum [P3]: Scrum Teams - Myth 8: The scrum master is a junior agile coach Flashcards
What does the scrum guide say that disproves the myth “the SM is a junior agile coach”
- contains a clear description of the services a scrum master provides the development team, the PO and the ENTIRE organization
- coaching the Development Team in self-organization and cross-functionality,
- helping the Product Owner find techniques for effective Product Backlog management and
- supporting the organization in delivering high-value products through the empirical process established through Scrum
What are the 8 stances of a SM? The SM is a …
- impediment remover
- facilitator
- coach
- teacher
- servant leader
- manager
- change agent
- mentor
Explain the Impediment Remover stance of an SM
The SM is a … AnImpediment Removerthat helps resolve issues that are blocking the team’s progress, taking into account the self-organising capabilities of the Development Team;
Explain the Facilitator stance of an SM
The SM is a … AFacilitatorthat sets the stage and provides clear boundaries in which the team can collaborate. This includes facilitation of the Scrum events to ensure they’ll achieve the desired outcome and - most importantly - that the empirical process is optimized;
Explain the Coach stance of an SM
The SM is a … ACoachthat helps individuals and groups to continuously improve in how they deliver valuable outcomes as a team or as an organization;
Explain the Teacher stance of an SM
The SM is a … ATeacherthat ensures that Scrum and relevant techniques are well-understood and enacted;
Explain the Servant Leader stance of an SM
The SM is a … AServant Leaderthat creates environments where teams can work effectively with stakeholders to create valuable outcomes;
Explain the Manager stance of an SM
The SM is a … AManagerthat is responsible for managing (true) impediments, eliminating waste, managing the process, managing the team’s health, managing the boundaries of self-organisation, and managing the culture;
Explain the Change Agent stance of an SM
The SM is a … AChange Agentthat helps to enable a culture in which Scrum Teams can flourish - on every level of the organization;
Explain the Mentor stance of an SM
The SM is a … AMentorthat transfers agile knowledge and experience to the team
What are six examples of challenges of a SM?
- How to facilitate transparency, inspection and adaptation in a traditional ‘closed’ organisation?
- How to coach organisations in truly collaborating with their Scrum Teams?
- How to manage the boundaries of self-organisation in control-driven organisations?
- How to offer a “safe to fail & learn” environment where experimentation?
- How to promote a culture where Scrum Teams can thrive?
How must a SM approach common challenges of being an SM?
In such a way that…
- Team success is valued over individual success;
- Continuous improvement and experimentation are promoted;
- “Agile contracts” are encouraged;
- Stable team composition is supported;
- Behaviour is rewards, not individual achievements;
Why is an SM in a good position to work with HR, Sales, stakeholders and other SMs?
- know what needs to change and why, remove impediments, how more value can be delivered
- HR - help find practices that are better aligned with scrum
- Sales - help move from fix-price/fixed-scope contracts to agile friendly contracts
- Stakeholders - help increase collaboration between stakeholders and team
- other SMs - org change from inside out
If a org choses to implement an empirical process primarily through Scrum, is there a need for Agile Coaches?
- No
- Scrum Masters should be enabled and supported to promote the empirical process on all levels of the organisation.
- If they can, and if they do, no other roles are necessary to help organizations generate valuable outcomes with Scrum.
Should we fire all agile coaches?
- No - still have value
- The need for Agile Coaches diminishes greatly when SMs are allowed to perform their intended role
- Both add value from organizational change POV
- SM - inside out approach (better)
- Agile Coaches - outside in approach
- Agile Coaches
- poor understanding of team (since not in team)
- lack management support
- less experience to drive change from outside in