Textbook Chapter 15 Flashcards
cognitive approach describes diffs in personality as diffs in…
the ways people PROCESS INFORMATION
predecessors to the cognitive approach
- found in Kurt Lewin’s field theory of behaviour
described MENTAL REPS we form of the important elements in our lives and how we ORGANIZE these cognitive elements within our “life space”
- George Kelly
his writings = starting point for many cognitive approaches to personality
George Kelly life dates
1905-1967
George Kelly background
born near Wichita, Kansas
debater - good at challenging arguments and conventional positions
graduated with degree in physics and mathematics
then studied educational sociology
then studied education at Uni of Edinburgh
then got PhD in psychology
after Dust Bowl - “came to see what these people needed most was an EXPLANATION for what had happened to them and an ABILITY to PREDICT what would happen to them in the future”
^ PERSONAL CONSTRUCT THEORY
then served in the navy
George Kelly’s approach to personality begins with…
unique conception of human kind
George Kelly called his perspective what?
man-the-scientist perspective
like scientists, people CONSTANTLY GENERATE and TEST HYPOTHESES about their world
we have a NEED FOR PREDICTABILITY
Kelly: our need for predictability results in…
something like template matching - PERSONAL CONSTRUCTS
our ideas about world are like TRANSPARENT TEMPLATES
we place them over the events we encounter
if they MATCH, we RETAIN the templates
if NOT, we MODIFY THEM for a better prediction next time
personal constructs
Kelly
the cognitive structure we use to INTERPRET and PREDICT EVENTS
they’re BIPOLAR
what does it mean to say that personal constructs are BIPOLAR?
we classify relevant objects in an EITHER/OR fashion within our constructs
when you meet someone for first time, you apply personal constructs:
- friendly/unfriendly
- tall/short
- intelligent/unintelligent
- masculine/feminine
does bipolar nature of personal constructs mean we see world as black and white?
ie. someone is either intelligent or unintellignece
NO - because after applying the first construct, we use OTHER bipolar constructs to determine the EXTENT of blackness/whiteness
ie. academically intelligent/commonsense intelligent
how can personal constructs be used to explain personality
Kelly maintained that diffs in personality largely result from diffs in ways people CONSTRUE THE WORLD
different people will use different constructs (ie. friendly/unfriendly versus fun/boring) to evaluate people and things
people tend to use the SAME CONSTRUCTS ACROSS SITUATIONS - have a characteristic way of interacting with people
for Kelly, the relatively stable patterns in our behaviour are the result of…
relatively stable way we CONSTRUE the world
to get a sense of your own personal constructs, ask yourself…
what you tend to notice about people when you first meet them
what you come up with are probably some of the constructs you use to make sense of other people and their behaviour
also possible that people use the same constructs but…
see the world differently
people’s constructs may be similar on one pole but…
not on the other
ie. outgoing/reserved construct versus outgoing/melancholy construct
^ what one person may see as RESERVED behaviour another may see as SADNESS
diff people can also organize constructs…
differently
practically endless ways to organize constructs
Kelly rejected notion that psych disorders are caused by…
past traumatic experiences
rather, he argued that people suffer from psych problems because of DEFECTS IN THEIR CONSTRUCT SYSTEMS
past experiences with an unloving parent/tragic incident may EXPLAIN WHY people construe the world as they do, but they AREN’T THE CAUSE of the person’s problems
Kelly placed what at heart of most psychological problems?
anxiety
we become anxious when our PERSONAL CONSTRUCTS FAIL TO MAKE SENSE of the events in our lives
ie. upcoming interview will cause more anxiety if you have no idea who you’ll meet/what you’ll be asked
ie. romantic relationship problems are particularly unsettling when you don’t know why things are going poorly/don’t know how to fix things
black box metaphor
used in early days of behaviourism
features in environment (ie. loud noise) cause behaviours (ie. running away) but what HAPPENS INSIDE an organism, between the stimulus and response, is UNKNOWN and UNKNOWABLE
in contrast to black box understanding…
for cognitive personality psychologists, the ELEMENTS BETWEEN STIMULUS and RESPONSE are extremely IMPORTANT
some of the cognitive variables that account for individual differences
encodings
expectations and beliefs
affects
goals and values
competencies and self-regulatory plans
cognitive model of personality
- FEATURES OF SITUATIONS (environment) are NOTICED (and some aren’t)
^ which features are noticed depends on our cognitive structures
- once perceived, VARIOUS MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS (like expectations, values, goals) INTERACT to determine RESPONSE to situation
- our BEHAVIOUR can also affect the SITUATIONS
how do we explain individual differences using the cognitive framework of personality?
- we each possess different set of MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS
- how EASILY we ACCESS certain kinds of info stored in MEMORY varies from individual to individual
ie. Christmas tree will remind one person of religious values, another of family/seasonal joy, and a third of sad memories from childhood
self-concept
our cognitive representation of ourselves
develops at a young age
they’re RELATIVELY STABLE over time
play CENTRAL ROLE in the way we PROCESS INFO and thus how we interact with the world around us
why do some succeed in making exercise a part of their lives, while others fail?
one explanation has to do with whether the would-be exerciser incorporates exercise into his/her self-schema
self-schema
cognitive reps of ourselves that we use to ORGANIZE and PROCESS SELF-RELEVANT info
consists of BEHAVIOURS/ATTRIBUTES that are MOST IMPORTANT to yuo
what makes up your core self-schema?
basic info
name, physical appearance, significant relationships - these are found within everyone’s self-schema
what part of self-schemas are most interesting?
the UNIQUE features within your self-schema
ie. some people include ATHLETE or PHYSICALLY FIT in their self-schemas - consider athletic activities as part of who they are
traits concepts can also be a part of your…
self-schema
ie. independence or friendliness
if you consider yourself a friendly person, you frequently evaluate/decide your behaviour by asking “was that a friendly thing to do/what would a friendly person do?”
but it may never occur to someone else to evaluate their actions in terms of friendliness
random example of a potential self schema
(stored in memory)
religion
geography
basketball
school
men
clothing
parents
wine
these are all placed at a different distance away from the centrally placed SELF
because of individual diffs in self-schemas…
we behave differently
diff behaviour based on diff self-schemas in elementary school children
kids with PROSOCIAL as part of their self-schemas = more likely to GIVE VALUABLE TOKENS to others than kids who didn’t include prosocial in their self schemas
men and women whose self-schemas included sexuality reported…
higher levels of SEXUAL DESIRE and STRONGER ROMANTIC ATTACHMENTS than those whose self-schemas didn’t include sexuality
participants with simpatico were found to…
interact with others in a WARMER, MORE ENGAGED MANNER
(simpatico: interpersonal style emphasizing hospitality and graciousness)
how do psychologists determine what a person’s self schema looks like?
look at how people PERCEIVE and USE INFORMATION presented to them
ie. answer yes or no “are you a competitive person”
^ some people will answer this immediately and decisively, while others will pause to think
^ diff people will find Qs about diff traits easier or harder to answer
ITEMS THAT WERE EASY TO ANSWER ARE THOSE FOR WHICH YOU HAVE A WELL-DEFINED SCHEMA
having a schema for a particular trait (ie. competitiveness) means that…
their schema allows them to UNDERSTAND the concept
RETRIEVE RELEVANT INFO
and RESPOND IMMEDIATELY