social influence- minority influence Flashcards
minority influence
how one person or small group influences the beliefs and behaviour of other people
how is minority influence different to conformity?
minority may influence just one person, or a group of people (majority)- this is different from conformity where the majority does the influencing.
internalisation
-public behaviour and private beliefs changed
-minority influence leads to this
-three processes consistency, commitment, flexibility
role of consistency in minority influence
-doing same thing
-means minority’s views gain more interest
-consistency makes others rethink views
-synchronic and diachronic consistency
synchronic consistency
people in minority all saying the same thing
diachronic consistency
all being saying the same thing for some time
role of commitment in minority influence
-shows deep involvement
-helps gain attention (e.g. extreme activities)
-must create some risk to demonstrate commitment to cause
-augmentation principle
augmentation principle
majority pay even more attention
role of flexibility in minority influence
-shows willingness to listen to others
-the minority should balance consistency and flexibility so don’t appear rigid
-Nemeth (1986)
-minority adapt their POV and accept reasonable counterarguments
Nemeth on flexibility in minority influence
-1986
-being consistent and repeating same arguments and behaviours is rigid and off-putting to majority
process of minority influence
-individuals think deeply ab the minority position as its new/unfamiliar
-snowball effect- switch from minority to majority
-more this happens, faster the rate of conversion
-gradually minority becomes majority and social change has occurred.
snowball effect
-over time more people become ‘converted’
-there’s a switch from minority to majority
ao3 for consistency
-Moscovici et al (1969) found a consistent minority opinion had greater effect than an inconsistent one
-Wood et al (1994) meta analysis of almost 100 studies, found minorities seen as consistent most influential
-confirms consistency a major factor in MI
ao3 for deeper processing
-Martin et al. (2003) gave p’s a message supporting a particular viewpoint and measured attitudes. heard endorsement of view from either minority or majority. finally heard a conflicting view, attitudes measured again
-if p’s listened to minority group, less willing to change opinion to new view than if listened to majority group
-suggests minority message had been more deeply processed and had a more enduring effect.
counterpoint ao3 for deeper processing- limited
-in research studies minority/majority groups distinguished by numbers
-more to majorities/minorities than just numbers (e.g. power, status, commitment)
-research studies limited in what they tell us about real-world minority influence