S4. Biological Therapies (Drug Treatment) Flashcards
1
Q
Antipsychotics
A
- dopamine antagonists (inhibitors)
- bind to complementary receptors on post-synaptic neurone, stopping dopamine neurotransmission
2
Q
Types of Antipsychotics
A
Typical and Atypical
3
Q
Typical Antipsychotics
A
- ‘first generation’ (first prescribed for SZ)
- eg. Chlorpromazine (calming and sedative)
- acts upon histamine and dopamine receptors
4
Q
Atypical Antipsychotics
A
- ‘second generation’ (adds to effectiveness of first gen.; and alleviates side effects)
- acts upon other neurotransmitters receptors on post-synaptic membranes
- e.g. Clozapine (targets serotonin and glutamate receptors)
- e.g. Risperidone (targets serotonin and dopamine receptors)
5
Q
Clozapine advantage
A
- patient improvement in cognitive function and mood
- however, offset by ‘agranulocytosis’ side effect
6
Q
Rispoeridome advantage
A
- smaller doses required than Clozapine (acts more strongly on dopamine receptors)
- safer for patient who have history of blood related illness (avoids potential ‘agranulocytosis’)
7
Q
- Eval: Antipsychotic Development based upon Dopamine Hypothesis
A
- original hypothesis (DH) attributes excess dopamine SZ
- revised hypothesis attributes lack of dopamine SZ
- therefore, a further reduction in dopamine should worsen symptoms, NOT alleviate them (as suggested by the DH)
- validity of antipsychotics questioned, as well as DH as an explanation for SZ
8
Q
- Eval: Side-Effects
A
- short-term (agitation, weights gain) = mild
- long term (tardive dyskinesia, NMS, agranulocytosis)
9
Q
Tardive Dyskinesia
A
involuntary contraction and relaxation of facial muscles
10
Q
Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS)
A
- causes: dopamine receptor blockage, CNS infections
- characterised: fever, altered mental states, muscle rigidity, autonomic dysfunction
- NOT offset by atypical antipsychotics (‘agranulocytosis’ side effect still present, continually monitored -blood tests)
11
Q
- Eval: Validity of Antipsychotics
A
- studies ‘reviewing effectiveness’ instead only review how ‘calm and functional’ the patient is
- suppressing symptoms ≠ controlling them (studies lack face validity)