F10. DwOB: Custodial Sentencing Flashcards
Aims of Custodial Sentencing
Deterrence: ‘put off’ individuals and society from crimes
Incapacitation: protect public from criminal
Retribution: ‘eye for an eye’ proportional punishment
Rehabilitation: opportunities for training and treatment, address distal cause of issue
Effects of Custodial Sentencing
Stress, Depression, Institutionalisation (adjusting to outside life), Prisonisation
Britain vs Norway Recidivism
Britain has highest recidivism rate due to focus on retribution. Norway has lowest due to focus on rehabilitation.
- Eval: not universally effective
Extent of effect will depend upon dispositional traits of the convict, length of sentence, previous prison experience, type of prison, number/gender of officers. Effectiveness varies, therefore not universally effective.
+ Eval: Rehabilitation Opportunity
e.g.
- Sex Offenders and CBT schemes to reduce effects of minimalisation and recidivism rates. - Violent Offenders and anger management schemes
- Token economy schemes
- Restorative justice schemes
Suggests prison is useful
- Eval: Politics may influence custodial sentencing
Majority of public favours punishment (therefore custodial sentencing). Politicians may toughen up on prison and sentences to appease the public.