Research methods Flashcards
experimental method
changing independent variable to measure effect on dependent variable
aim
a statement outlining the purpose of an investigation
hypothesis
a clear, testable statement stating relationship between variables being used
directional hypothesis
states the direction of the difference or relationship
levels of the IV (independent variable)
to test the effect of the IV, there needs to be different conditions. different conditions are known as levels
operationalisation of variables
the process of defining variables in a way which makes them measurable i.e. referring to specific observable behaviours.
extraneous variables
any variable that isn’t the IV that will affect results if not controlled. two types: participant and situational variables
confounding variable
an EV that affects independent and dependent variables, it’s difficult to tell if results are due to CV or a IV
demand characteristics
cue from a researcher which might affect participants behaviour. please-u effect = acting in a way to please researcher. screw-u effect = acting in a way they think will sabotage the study
investigator effect
anything investigator does which has an effect on participants performance in a study other than intended
randomisation
the use of chance in order to control for the effects of bias when designing materials and deciding the order of conditions
standardisation
using exactly the same formulised procedures and instructions for all participants in a research study
laboratory experiment
conducted in a highly controlled environment
evaluation of lab experiments
+ high control over EVs and CVs so you know that any change in DV is due to IV, giving it high internal validity
+ replication is more possible because of amount of control, making it more valid
- artificial so lack generalisability and have low external validity
- pts are aware they’re being tested so may act unusually
- don’t represent the everyday experience, low mundane realism
field experiment
an experiment conducted in the participants’ natural environment. natural, more everyday setting
evaluation of field experiments
+ higher mundane realism
+ pts may be unaware they’re being studied, more valid + authentic behaviour, high external validity
- no control of EVs and CVs so difficult to establish link between IV and DV
- precise replication is often impossible
- ethical issues of having no consent from pts - invasion of privacy?
natural experiment
no control over the IV and can’t change it.
the IV is always natural but not always the setting - could be in a lab.
DV may also be naturally occurring.
evaluation of natural experiments
+ allows us to study real world issues as they occur, high external validity
- naturally occurring events are rare, reducing opportunities for research, also limiting scope for generalising
- pts may not be randomly allocated, so less sure if IV affected DV
- if conducted in lab = lacks realism
- demand characteristics may be an issue
quasi-experiment
the IV is based on existing differences (e.g. age or gender) so can’t be controlled
random sampling
everyone has an equal chance of being chosen. everyone should have random numbers assigned to them and chosen using a random selection method
systematic sampling
a systematic formula is used – every 50th person is picked from the phone book/school register
stratified sampling
different strata or subgroups are identified in the target population. what percentage of the whole target population does each sub group form? a random sample is taken from each subgroup so that the sample has the
same percentages as the target population
opportunity sampling
the researcher selects people from the target population who happens to be there at the time, and who are willing and able to take part.
volunteer sampling
asking for people to volunteer if they are able to take part in the study
what is the purpose of a sample?
to be representative of a target population, meaning that the results can be generalised to the whole population
what are the 6 types of observation?
naturalistic, controlled, covert, overt, participant, and non-participant
naturalistic vs controlled observation
naturalistic is observed in environment where behaviour would normally occur. controlled is in a structured environment where some variables are controlled
covert vs overt observation
covert is when participants behaviour is watched without consent. overt is with consent
participant vs non-participant observation
participant is when the researcher becomes a member of the group they are observing. non-participant is when the research remains separate from the group whose behaviour they are watching.
evaluation of natural vs controlled observation
natural observations have high ecological validity + external validity, they can be generalised but they are difficult to replicate. controlled observations can be repeated to check reliability but they’re not as easy to generalise
evaluation of covert vs overt observations
covert observations don’t have issue of demand characteristics, meaning data collected has higher internal validity, but are less ethical as participants can’t give informed consent. overt are more ethically acceptable but demand characteristics can make behaviour unrealistic
evaluation of participant vs non-participant observations
participant studies mean that the researcher can get more in-depth data as they are in close proximity but they do risk ‘going native’ and losing objectivity. non-participant studies allow researcher to maintain objectivity but lose the chance of more in depth data
what is the British Psychological Society (BPS) and what do they do?
representative body that promotes excellence and ethical practice in psychological studies
when do ethical issues occur?
when there is a conflict between the rights of participants and the goals of the study
what are the 4 main ethical concerns?
informed consent, confidentiality, deception and protection from harm
informed consent
made aware of the aims and procedure of the study and their right to withdraw. in form of a consent letter, if participant is under 14, parent/guardian has to give consent
evaluation points of informed consent
- explaining exact aims can make studies meaningless and artificial.
- naturalistic observations don’t need consent as they are in a public area where you can expect to be watched.
- Menges (1973) found 97% of American studies hadn’t given participants all information
deception
deliberately misleading or withholding information. participants cant give informed consent if deceived. BPS allow some deception if scientifically justified. they can also obtain general consent with knowledge that deception will take place
protection from harm
risk of harm to participants can’t be higher than risk of their everyday lives. counselling should be offered if subjected to embarrassment or stress. a debrief should also be given after studies finish.
protection from harm evaluation
it’s difficult to accurately assess, and predict what participants will find distressing or embarrassing.
confidentiality
right to privacy, meaning personal information can’t be shared. all data collected should not use names. pts can’t be identifiable from data published (e.g. from characteristics, place, time). pts should be warned if data isn’t going to be completely anonymous
pilot study
small scale trial run of study to check procedure and make final tweaks - prevents money being wasted on research that has too many issues
single-blind procedure
participants are unaware of the aim + conditions. this controls demand characteristics
double-blind procedure
researcher is also unaware of the aim + conditions. this reduces potential bias
control condition
sets a baseline with no manipulation of the independent variable. it can be used to compare to the experimental condition to know the effects are due to the IV rather than other variables
what are the two types of observational design?
structured or unstructured.
what is an unstructured observational design?
writing down everything observed, rich in detail, good for small groups