Attachment - romanian orphans Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

institutionalisation

A

effects of living under state care for a long time with little emotional care (negative impacts on development)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1990 Romania

A

banned abortion and contraceptives meant people were abandoning newborns, leaving 170,000 orphans on privation. being malnourished and abused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Rutter et al (1998-2011)

A

longitudinal, natural study of 165 romanian orphans adopted into british families. varying ages at adoption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rutter’s method

A

grouped by age when adopted.
groups: under 6 months, 6 months-2 years, over 2 years
control group with no privation (52 british adoptees)
each group assessed at ages 4, 6, 11 and 15

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Rutter’s findings

A

age 6:
- disinhibited attachment (overly friendly to strangers)
- more common in those adopted after 2 years old
age 11:
- over 1/2 that displayed disinhibited attachment at 6 still displayed those traits
- 77 IQ after 2 years, 102 IQ under 6 months
- if adopted after 6 months then showed delayed physical, emotional and intellectual development
age 15:
- intellectual problems continue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Rutter’s conclusions

A

privation has severe, long lasting effects but age of adoption impacts recovery heavily.
even children that were adopted after 2 years could still recover if given correct care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Zeanah et al (2005)

A

95 children, 12-31 months that had spent 90% of their lives in institutional care.
compared to control group of 50 children. measured attachment by strange situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Zeanah’s findings

A

74% control group securely attached
19% orphans securely attached
44% institutionalised disinhibited attachment
20% control group disinhibited
65% institutionalised disorganised attached

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

strengths of romanian orphan studies

A

+ practical applications - changed policies in orphanages and adoption
+ support Bowlby’s internal working model
+ challenge Bowlby’s critical period. It’s a sensitive period and the damage is not irreversible
+ supporting evidence - Goldfarb (1947):
compared adoption after 3 years and 6 months. early fostering = higher IQ and social skills, showing institutionalisation can be reversed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

weaknesses of romanian orphan studies

A
  • children weren’t randomly selected for adoption - parents selected them. bias towards children that were more sociable at younger age.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly