Attachment - maternal deprivation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what happened in 1945 that meant insecure attachments were more common?

A

end of WW2.
children were homeless, orphaned or evacuated, meaning they were away from their mothers and so missing the critical period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does deprivation from a caregiver during critical period cause

A

harmful effects on child’s development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

why did Bowlby look into health of homeless children in post-war Europe?

A

he was commissioned by the WHO (world health organisation) to write a report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

consequences of deprivation

A

low IQ
affectionless psychopathy
criminality (delinquency)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

separation

A

only becomes a problem if child is not given any care, brief separations aren’t significant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what causes psychological damage

A

extended separation (deprivation) with no caregiver substitute within the first 30 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Robertson and Bowlby PDD model (1952)

A

short term separation and deprivation both cause this model.
Protest - crying panic, angry and fearful
Despair - acceptance. loss of hope, self-comfort
Detachment - indifference/anger towards caregiver, less distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

affectionless psychopathy

A

no guilt or strong emotions for others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bowlby’s 44 thieves study (1944)

A

natural experiment, independent groups study where he interviewed children and parents, IQ tests and observed attitudes.
88 emotionally maladjusted children (44 thieves and 44 not thieves)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

findings of 44 thieves study

A
  • 86% affectionless thieves experienced deprivation
  • 17% not affectionless thieves experienced deprivation
  • 5% non-thieves experienced deprivation
  • more than 50% separated from mother for 6+ months during critical period.
  • maternal deprivation leads to affectionless psychopathy and delinquency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

privation

A

no attachments formed with anyone at all

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

evidence of privation

A

brain scans look difference in those that experienced privation and those who didn’t
case studies used as its so rare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

example of case study in privation

A

Genie. 13 years old but cognitively 13 months old. treated people like objects, irreparable damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

AO3 of case studies

A

+ high ecological validity
+ more ethical than creating these situations
- no control so low internal validity and can’t reproduce
- can’t generalise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

long term developmental effects

A

lower IQ
affectionless psychopathy
dwarfism (shorter, sleep problems, larger appetite)
anaclitic depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Koluchova (1976) czech twins case study

A

adopted at 7, formed attachment then after being abused and privation for years.
shows effects of privation are reversible? at 11 their speech was normal and at 15 their IQ was normal.
they always had eachother so did they form attachments to eachother?

17
Q

strengths of research on maternal deprivation?

A

+ real world applications , substitute emotional care can reduce impacts of separation and deprivation
+ evidence - Robertson filmed infant in care home when mum was in hospital for 9 days. distressed.
Robertson filmed 2 year old in hospital for 8 days, distressed and begged to go home

18
Q

limitations of research on maternal deprivation?

A
  • individual differences
  • unclear if deprivation or privation has been studied in some cases
  • retrospective recall from 44 thieves may be inaccurate
  • investigator effects
  • conclusions are correlational
  • evidence - Lewis repeated 44 thieves with 500 children, deprivation did not predict criminality or future relationships
19
Q

Robertson and Robertson (1967-73)

A
  • 2 yr old hospital for 8 days
  • visited occasionally by parents and begs to go home
  • eventually tries to cope with disappointment of staying (PDD model)
  • real life applications