research design Flashcards
research design is the
overall plan for answering the research question
question should have
- nature of comparison
- type of setting
- population, sample
- independent and dependent variable
comparisons between two groups or more
- single group: 2 or more points in time (pre/post)
- single group under different circumstances or experiences (group vs individual therapy)
- based on relative rankings (severe vs mild autism)
- compare with samples from other studies
research designs also include
- methods to be used to contol variables (isolate dependent and independent variables)
- timing and frequency of data collection (when, relative to other events)
- setting (naturalistic vs laboratory)
- nature of communications with subjects (fully divulge or not)
dimensions along which designs can be described
- experimental vs non-experimental
- degree of structure imposed
- time dimension
- type of group comparisons between subjects and within subjects
- non-experimental
experimental
quantitative
non-experimental
qualitative
degree of structure imposed
how much we are controlling
time dimension
- longitudinal
- cross-sectional
longitudinal
looking for change in time
cross-sectional
collecting data at 2 points in time
multiple points of data collection secondary to
studying time related processes
determine time sequences
developing comparisons
enhancing research control
trend studies
periods of time
observing what’s going on with trends
cohort
when you take a small population (by age)
study them over time with respect to a phenomenon (subject)
panel studies
take same cohort and measure across 2 periods of time
follow up studies
how they feel about same topic in a period of time
ex 5 years down the line
cross section cohort
comparing 2 different cohorts follow up study can be a panel study
within subjects
in same group of people (more control of variables)
between subjects
different group of people
non-experimental
not manipulating anything (qualitative)
- retrospective
- prospective
retrospective
have an outcome
want to know what causes are (antecedent) study prior habits
prospective
know causing variables
going forward in time
see how many develop outcomes
usually do prospective after you gain evidence from
retrospective
cons of retrospective
memory might not be accurate
might get defensive
might not tell the truth