Personality Flashcards
Personality
The patterns of thoughts and feelings and thee way in which we interact with our environment and other people too make us a unique person
3 approaches to personality
1) Trait approach
2) Social learning approach
3) Interactionist approach
Trait approach
> Suggests that you are born with innate characteristics
Stable and remain consistent despite changing circumstances
Result of trait approach
> Coaches/performers/opposition can predict how people react to certain situations
E.G. An extroverted basketball player may be more vocal on the court
Eyesenck’s model of personality
> Developed a series of questions about personality
Asked 700 soldiers (being treated for disorders)
Their answers linked - highlighting traits
Discovery that behaviour can be shown in two dimensions
Introvert/Extrovert, Neurotic/Stable
Introverts
> Personality characteristics of a person who does not seek social situations, likes peace and unite, good concentration
E.G. Chris Froome
Extroverts
> Personality characteristics of a person who seeks social situations and likes excitement, lacks concentration
E.G. Anthony Joshua, Luis Suarez
Stable
> Traits are unchangeable and remain predictable
Someone may always react to a situation calmly or show anxiety
Neurotic
Traits are changeable and unpredictable
> Someone may often show aggression but the extent varies
Coach implications
> Extroverts tend to achieve better performance at higher arousal levels, in team activities, or gross motor skills
Introverts tend to achieve better performance at lower arousal levels
Limitations to Eyesenck’s model
> Too simplistic
Only used results from soldiers
Does not account for behavioural changes over time or situations
Limited value for predicting success
Self-report - relies on honesty
Answers influenced by subject mood
Cattell’s 16 PF questionnaire
> Identified 171 behaviours, grouped into 16 traits
Questionnaire is valid and reliable measure of these traits
Disagreed with Eysenck - believed there was a larger number of traits
Broad sample of participants
Limitations of Cattell’s questionnaire
> Subjects mood influenced answers
Does not account for behaviour change over time and circumstances
Self-report - relies on subject honesty
No value in predicting success
Eysenck and Cattell: Similarities
> Both trait approaches
Both seen as simplistic - no account for changes over time
Both use self-report measure - require honesty
Eysenck and Cattell:
> C - there are many more traits that build a personality, E - there are four
C - used broad sample of participants E - 700 soldiers
C - gives individuals more of an understanding in determining their personality