memory - eyewitness testimony Flashcards
how can a reconstructive memory make us have errors when recalling information?
-doesn’t play back exactly what we saw->cannot be accurate
how can our schema make us have errors when recalling information?
- tend just fill in gaps from our schemas about info
- recall what we would have EXPECTED from the situation as schemas are based on knowledge we have about the world.
what are the factors affecting the accuracy of an eyewitness testimony?
MISSLEADING INFORMATION; leading questions and post-event discussion and ANXIETY
what is meant by misleading information: leading questions?
questions in interviews are phrased in a particular way to prompt a certain response.
what research was done into misleading information: leading questions?
LOFTUS AND PALMER: 45 students in 6 groups all showed video of car crash after asked “how fast were the cars travelling when they hit each other” word hit changed in each different group
what were the findings of Loftus and Palmer’s research misleading information: leading questions?
when question said smashed students said 41mph
when questions said contacted students said 32mph
what happened one week later in Loftus and Palmer’s research misleading information: leading questions??
asked students if they had seen glass; 32% of ‘smashed’ group said yes, 14% of ‘hit’ group said yes
what is meant by misleading information: post-event discussion?
conversation between eyewitnesses or eyewitness and other person about the event
what research has been done into misleading information: post-event discussion?
GABBERT ET AL: pps in pairs and watched clip of same crime. Crime was filmed from different viewpoints.
what was the findings of Gabbert et al’s research misleading information: post-event discussion?
71% of pps incorrectly reported aspects of crime they had not seen but was mentioned in discussion after.
what does Gabbert et al’s research into misleading information: post-event discussion show us?
eyewitnesses often go along with each other - to gain social approval which is called memory conformity.
what is a strength about the two sets of research completed about misleading information?
both have cause and effect can be determined as its a lab experiment - dv ONLY caused iv to change
what is a weakness about the two sets of research completed about misleading information?
both lack ecological validity (lab experiment)- not real life, lower emotions L&P not as real and didn’t try hard enough to recall info.G
what practical applications has this research done for society?
professionals are much for careful in interviews with questions and are cautious about accuracy - results in fewer wrong convictions
why is using a lab experiments also a good thing for research into misleading information?
ethical issues challenge field experiments - seeing fake crime may leave pps emotionally affected