Media - ownership and control Flashcards
Marxists believe that the concentration of media ownership is…
inherently dangerous, as
the capitalist ideals are being transmitted more
intensely.
MEDIA PROFESSIONALISM
(definition)
The idea that concentration of ownership is bad, is criticised by some sociologists
Arguments of media professionalism
- Just because 1 corporation owns many outlets, doesn’t mean it turns into a giant brainwashing machine with all employees also
brainwashed. - Individual companies and individuals within corporations have agency to speak, write and edit how they want.
- This is part of journalistic professionalism.
MEDIA AUDIENCES - ACTIVE?
Even if journalists abandoned their professionalism, and started writing just what their bosses told them to write, the audience don’t passively believe everything and can be critical and selective
Ownership and control - The BBC , PSBs
Pluralists:
- point out that Public Service Broadcasting is still popular and owned by the public
- say these are impartial
What factors do Marxists believe that the government overrides?
- Media professionalism
- Impartialism
- Active audiences
Marxist beliefs of ownership & control
- state controls
- role of ideology
Marxists - state control
(ownership & control)
- The state can have huge power in relationship to the media.
- Depending on the gov. and ppl in power, the media can be changed drastically:
● The state can put controls on what media companies can do/own
● The state can control the content media companies put out
what do marxists think happens through the media
transition of capitalist ideology
Marxism - the role of ideology
(ownership & control)
Believe that the media creates false class-consciousness, through which the working class believe that meritocracy exists and society is fair
Disney working class study
USE NOTES! ADD TO THIS
The media & ideology - Miliband (1973)
Conservative and conformist ideology comes across as fact in the media
e.g articles on immigration/benefits being ‘bad’
The media & ideology - Tunstall and Palmer (1991)
Government not interested in
controlling media because of ‘regulatory favours’
regulatory favours - Tunstall & Palmer , example
SITUATION:
1) One of Rupert Murdoch’s papers publishes an article that
the conservative party don’t like
2) The Conservatives could then set about creating restrictions, or penalising Murdoch
3) Murdoch’s papers turn against the Conservatives
which would see them lose power.
( So instead, Tunstall and Palmer argue the media are left to do as they please!)
Ownership and control - 3 🔑 approaches
1) The manipulative approach (aka instrumental approach)
2) The hegemonic approach
3) The pluralist approach Associated with pluralism (obviously)
The manipulative approach , associated with?
traditional Marxism
The hegemonic approach, associated with?
neo-Marxism
The pluralist approach , associated with?
pluralism (obviously)
The Manipulative approach
(Owners)
Directly control and manipulate the content and audiences
- to protect their profits
- and spread the dominant ideology
The Manipulative approach
(media editors and managers)
have little choice but to run the media within the boundaries set by the owner.
The Manipulative approach
(audiences)
sees audiences as passive
- a mass of easily manipulated, unthinking and uncritical robots.
The manipulative approach - Evans
Argues that media moguls such as Murdoch undermine editorial independence and press editorial staff to adopt the same right-wing, conservative views as the moguls.
The Hegemonic approach
(media owners)
Although they have powerful influence, they rarely have day-to-day control of the media content, which is left in the
hands of editors and journalists
The Hegemonic approach
(staff)
have some independence, but still support the dominant ideology by choice
- not because they are manipulated into doing so
- have some independence, but still support the dominant ideology by choice, not because they are manipulated into doing so