Final Q&A Flashcards

Question

Which of the following proposal analysis techniques is the process of independently reviewing and evaluating specific elements of each offeror's proposed cost estimate to determine whether the estimated proposed cost elements are realistic for the work to be performed? Cost Analysis Cost Realism Analysis Price Analysis Price Realism Analysis

Answer 1

Cost Realism Analysis

Answer 2

D. Providing a service that connects to the facilities of a third-party, such as backhaul, roaming, or interconnection arrangements. Explanation: Under FAR 4.2102, the Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment (as per Section 889 of the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act) outlines restrictions on federal contracting involving certain covered telecommunications equipment and services (e.g., equipment from Huawei, ZTE, and other blacklisted entities). However, there are some exceptions, including: Backhaul, roaming, and interconnection arrangements: These are not prohibited because they are incidental third-party services that contractors cannot control directly. Analysis of Other Options: A contractor using a covered telecommunications system that is not used in the performance of a federal contract: Prohibited. FAR prohibits contractors from using covered equipment or services, even if not directly used for the federal contract, unless a waiver is granted. Extending an existing contract that contains covered telecommunication equipment: Prohibited. Extending or renewing contracts involving covered equipment is not allowed under the prohibition. Entering into a contract that is 30 days or fewer for services that use covered telecommunications equipment: Prohibited. There is no exemption based on contract duration; any contract involving covered equipment or services is prohibited unless a specific exception applies. Providing a service that connects to the facilities of a third-party, such as backhaul, roaming, or interconnection arrangements: Not prohibited. These are recognized exceptions because they are external services that contractors typically do not directly control.

Answer 3

B. Evaluated price of all offerors. Explanation: According to FAR 15.506, post-award debriefings are conducted to provide unsuccessful offerors with information about the award decision. The goal is to increase transparency while protecting sensitive information. The following details must be shared during a debriefing: The evaluated technical score of the successful offeror and the debriefed offeror. The evaluated price of the successful offeror. A summary of the rationale for the award decision. The ranking of the debriefed offeror, if a ranking was deve

Answer 4

A. Discussions. Explanation: According to FAR 15.307, proposal revisions can only be submitted in response to discussions. Discussions occur after the establishment of the competitive range and are conducted to allow offerors an opportunity to revise their proposals to address weaknesses, deficiencies, or other issues identified by the contracting officer. Following discussions, the contracting officer must request final proposal revisions (FPRs) before making an award decision. Analysis of Other Options: Discussions: Correct. Proposal revisions are allowed during discussions, and offerors in the competitive range are given the opportunity to submit final proposal revisions afterward. Fact finding: Fact finding is used to clarify or verify facts but does not involve the submission of proposal revisions. Clarifications: Clarifications are limited exchanges with offerors to resolve minor or administrative issues (e.g., correcting errors or confirming compliance). Proposal revisions are not allowed during clarifications. Communications to establish the competitive range: Communications at this stage are intended to determine which offerors should be included in the competitive range. Proposal revisions are not permitted during this phase.

Answer 5

D. A range of quantities for various line items. Explanation: According to FAR 17.204(f), options for increased quantities of supplies or services must be clearly defined and cannot be expressed as a range of quantities for various line items. The FAR requires that options be specific and measurable to avoid ambiguity and ensure enforceability. Options must be expressed in terms such as: A percentage increase in specific line items. A specified quantity increase in specific line items. Additional numbered line items.

Answer 6

direct costs

Answer 7

Fixed-price contracts below the simplified acquisition threshold

Answer 8

Non-personal services contract

Answer 9

the date agreed upon by the contracting parties

Answer 10

Delivery payments

Answer 11

The Economy Act always applies, regardless of whether more specific statutory authority exists.

Answer 12

Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act

Answer 13

Wage Rate Requirements (Construction)

Answer 14

Activity Address Code (AAC)

Answer 15

15 is the part, 5 is the subpart, 06 is the section, and a is the paragraph.

Answer 16

C. Federal Supply Schedules Explanation: Under FAR 51.101, contracting officers may authorize contractors to use Government supply sources—such as Federal Supply Schedules (FSS)—if it is determined to be in the Government's interest. This authorization allows contractors to procure supplies or services directly from these government sources to support contract performance. Analysis of Other Options: A contract using Federal Prison Industries: Federal Prison Industries (also known as UNICOR) provides mandatory sources of supply for certain items, but FAR 51.101 does not specifically apply to its use. Government-wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs): GWACs are contracts for technology and other solutions managed by specific agencies. Contractors do not "use" GWACs directly; they are used by federal agencies. Federal Supply Schedules: Correct. FAR 51.101 explicitly allows contracting officers to authorize contractors to use Federal Supply Schedules when performing a Government contract. A contract under the "AbilityOne" Program: The AbilityOne Program ensures that certain services and supplies are provided by organizations employing individuals with disabilities. FAR 51.101 does not apply to AbilityOne contracts.

Answer 17

A. Overprinting forms Explanation: According to FAR 53.106, contracting offices may request exceptions to standard forms when overprinting is required. Overprinting involves preprinting additional information on a standard form to tailor it for a specific purpose, such as including agency-specific instructions or terms. Exceptions to standard forms are requested through the General Services Administration (GSA), as outlined in FAR 53.106. Analysis of Other Options: Overprinting forms: Correct. Overprinting is a valid reason to request an exception to a standard form. Computer-generated forms: These are permissible as long as they conform to the exact layout and content of the standard forms. Exceptions are generally not required for computer-generated forms. Special construction and printing forms: This is not mentioned as a reason for requesting exceptions under FAR 53.106. Continuation sheets: Continuation sheets are standard and commonly used to supplement standard forms; they do not require an exception.

Answer 18

B. either the agency or the General Accountability Office (GAO) Explanation: Under FAR 33.102, protests may be filed with: The agency: This is referred to as an agency-level protest, where the protest is resolved internally by the contracting agency. The Government Accountability Office (GAO): The GAO provides an independent forum for bid protests, typically involving issues like improper evaluation or failure to follow solicitation requirements. Additionally, protests may also be filed with the United States Court of Federal Claims (COFC), although this is not explicitly stated in FAR 33.102. COFC is an alternative to GAO and agency-level protests but is not included in the correct options for this question.

Answer 19

C. A subcontract providing for payment on a fixed-price incentive basis Explanation: Under FAR 44.203(b), the contracting officer may consent to subcontracts, but certain types of subcontracts are explicitly prohibited or require specific scrutiny. Here's how the options align with FAR guidance: A subcontract that makes the results of arbitration between the prime contractor and subcontractor binding on the Government: Not permitted. This would improperly obligate the Government to decisions in which it has no direct participation, violating FAR principles. A subcontract obligating the contracting officer to deal directly with the subcontractor: Not permitted. The Government maintains a relationship only with the prime contractor and does not deal directly with subcontractors. A subcontract providing for payment on a fixed-price incentive basis: Permitted. Fixed-price incentive contracts are an acceptable contract type and may be used in subcontracts with contracting officer consent. A subcontract providing for payment on a cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost basis: Not permitted. This type of contract is explicitly prohibited under FAR 16.102(c) because it incentivizes increased costs without promoting cost control.

Answer 20

A. Approval above the contracting officer. Explanation: According to FAR 50.101-3, agencies must maintain complete records of all extraordinary contractual actions, but approval above the contracting officer is not explicitly required to be included in the records. The records must include: The contractor's request: Documentation of the relief or modification requested by the contractor. All relevant memorandums, correspondence, affidavits, and other pertinent documents: Supporting documents to justify the request and the decision-making process. A copy of the contractual document implementing an approved request: This ensures that the final action is properly documented.

Answer 21

B. critical and non-critical Explanation: Under FAR 46.203, contract items are technically classified as either critical or non-critical for the purpose of determining the appropriate level of inspection and quality assurance. The classifications are based on the item's importance to the mission and the consequences of failure: Critical Items: Items that require special attention and inspection because their failure could result in mission failure, injury, or significant loss. Non-Critical Items: Items that do not have as significant an impact on mission success or safety, requiring less stringent inspection and oversight. This classification helps determine the type and level of quality assurance procedures that are applied.

Answer 22

D. 25 Explanation: According to FAR 41.103(a), the General Services Administration (GSA) is authorized under 40 U.S.C. 501 to contract for utility services for periods not exceeding 25 years. This extended contract term is allowed to support long-term planning and stable relationships with utility providers, which is essential for the efficient management of government facilities and resources. Key Takeaway: GSA is authorized to enter into utility service contracts for up to 25 years under 40 U.S.C. 501 and FAR 41.103(a), ensuring flexibility and stability in utility procurement.

Answer 23

A. The head of the contracting activity. Explanation: According to FAR 33.104(c)(2), after a protest is filed, the head of the contracting activity (HCA) is the official authorized to permit continued performance of a contract in the face of a protest after award. This authority is contingent upon a determination that: Performance of the contract is in the best interest of the United States, or Urgent and compelling circumstances significantly affecting the interests of the United States will not allow for waiting for the protest decision. This decision must be documented with a detailed rationale and added to the contract file.

Answer 24

D. An end product manufactured in the United States if the product is a commercially available off-the-shelf item. Explanation: Under the Buy American statute and its implementing regulations in FAR 25.001(c) and FAR 25.003, a domestic end product that does not consist wholly or predominantly of iron or steel must meet specific criteria: Substantial transformation: An end product is considered domestic if it is manufactured in the United States and has undergone a substantial transformation. Unmanufactured end product: If the product is unmanufactured, it must be mined or produced in the United States. Domestic content test: The end product must be manufactured in the United States and meet the domestic content test, which requires that a certain percentage of the cost of its components is mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States.

Answer 25

True Explanation: According to FAR 25.1001, when applying an alternate to FAR 52.215-2 (Audit and Records—Negotiation) or FAR 52.215-5 (Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders—Commercial Products and Commercial Services) in the context of foreign acquisitions, the contracting officer must prepare a Determination and Findings (D&F). The D&F must include the following: Identification of the contract and its purpose. Identification of whether the contract is with a foreign contractor, foreign government, or an agency of a foreign government. Description of efforts to include the basic clause. Price and availability analysis of supplies or services from the United States and other sources. Determination that using the alternate clause will best serve the interest of the United States.

Answer 26

Federal Energy Management Program

Answer 27

D. Assurances that the offeror will include the clause at 52.219-6. Explanation: Under FAR 19.704, a subcontracting plan must include specific elements aimed at ensuring compliance with small business subcontracting goals. Some of the acceptable contents include: A description of the method used to develop the subcontracting goals (e.g., how the contractor determined realistic goals for small business participation). A description of the method used to identify potential sources for solicitation purposes (e.g., outreach efforts or databases used to find small business subcontractors). A statement of the total dollars planned to be subcontracted, with a breakdown for small businesses, including small disadvantaged, women-owned, HUBZone, and veteran-owned businesses.

Answer 28

B. Suspend action on the acquisition. Explanation: According to FAR 19.502-8, if a contracting officer (CO) rejects the Small Business Administration's (SBA) recommendation to set aside an acquisition for small business, the SBA can appeal the decision to the head of the contracting activity (HCA). During the appeal process, the contracting officer must suspend action on the acquisition until the appeal is resolved, unless: The HCA makes a written determination that proceeding with the acquisition is in the best interest of the Government. Urgent and compelling circumstances exist that require the acquisition to proceed.

Answer 29

C. Basic Ordering Agreements Explanation: According to FAR 16.703, a Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) is a written instrument of understanding between a government agency and a contractor. It outlines: Terms and conditions that apply to future orders. A general description of the supplies or services to be provided. Methods for pricing, issuing, and delivering future orders. A BOA is not a contract by itself but provides a framework for issuing orders efficiently when specific requirements arise. Analysis of Other Options: Indefinite-Delivery Arrangements: Incorrect. This is not a defined term under the FAR. Instead, the FAR discusses Indefinite-Delivery Contracts (IDCs) in FAR Subpart 16.5. Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs): Incorrect. While BPAs (covered under FAR 13.303) are also agreements for streamlined purchasing, they are typically used under simplified acquisition procedures and are not as formal as BOAs. Basic Ordering Agreements: Correct. BOAs provide the structure for future orders, as described in FAR 16.703. Fixed-Price Contracts: Incorrect. Fixed-price contracts are fully executed contracts with fixed terms, not agreements for fut

Answer 30

B. Cost Analysis Explanation: According to FAR 15.404-1(c), cost analysis is the review and evaluation of: Separate cost elements (e.g., labor, materials, overhead). Profit or fee in a contractor's proposal. The application of judgment to assess whether the proposed costs are fair and reasonable or realistic.

Answer 31

D. Contracting officers shall tailor this clause by addenda to the solicitation and contract. Explanation: According to FAR 12.302, contracting officers may tailor the clause at FAR 52.212-4 to accommodate the specific needs of a particular acquisition, provided the tailoring is consistent with commercial practices and does not contradict statutory requirements. Tailoring is done by addenda to the solicitation and contract. The process ensures the clause aligns with both the commercial nature of the acquisition and the Government’s requirements. Analysis of Other Options: Contracting officers may not tailor this clause: Incorrect. FAR 12.302 explicitly permits tailoring of the clause when necessary, as long as it aligns with commercial practices. Contracting officers may tailor any paragraph of this clause: Incorrect. While tailoring is permitted, certain paragraphs of FAR 52.212-4 cannot be tailored because they are required by statute or regulation. Contracting officers may tailor any paragraph of this clause if a waiver is approved: Incorrect. Tailoring does not require a waiver but must adhere to the guidelines in FAR 12.302. Contracting officers shall tailor this clause by addenda to the solicitation and contract: Correct. Tailoring is explicitly done by addenda, as stated in FAR 12.302, ensuring it is clear and consistent with the solicitation and contract requirements. Key Takeaway:

Answer 32

C. When contract awards exceed $30,000 Explanation: According to FAR 5.301(a), contracting officers must synopsize contract awards in the System for Award Management (SAM) via the Contract Opportunities portal when the contract award exceeds $30,000, unless an exception applies. This synopsis provides public notice of the contract award and promotes transparency and accountability in federal procurement.

Answer 33

B. Resembles the substance of a competitive acquisition. Explanation: Under FAR 6.3, contracting officers may award contracts using other than full and open competition in specific circumstances, as outlined in FAR 6.302. These justifications must be based on valid criteria such as unique capabilities, substantial cost duplication, or schedule impacts. However, the criterion that a procurement "resembles the substance of a competitive acquisition" is not a valid justification for using other than full and open competition. Analysis of Other Options: Demonstration of unique capability specific to the services proposed: Valid. FAR 6.302-1 allows for sole-source contracts if only one source can meet the requirements due to unique capabilities. Resembles the substance of a competitive acquisition: Not valid. This is not a recognized criterion for other than full and open competition. Substantial duplication of cost unrecoverable through competition: Valid. FAR 6.302-1(a)(2)(ii) allows for exceptions if competition would cause substantial duplication of costs that are not expected to be recovered. Schedule impact causing unacceptable delays: Valid. FAR 6.302-2 permits the use of other than full and open competition in cases of urgency where delays would significantly harm the Government.

Answer 34

A. DoD Manual 5220.22, Volume 2, National Industrial Security Program: Industrial Security Procedures for Government Activities. Explanation: According to FAR 4.402(b), the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), codified at 32 CFR Part 117, is implemented through: The NISPOM itself, which provides guidance for safeguarding classified information by contractors, licensees, and grantees of the U.S. government. DoD Manual 5220.22, Volume 2, which outlines industrial security procedures specific to government activities.

Answer 35

The Contracting Officer may use the combined synopsis and solicitation procedure. FAR 5.203.

Answer 36

Source Selection Evaluation Board Report

Answer 37

C. Public interest. Explanation: Under FAR 6.302-7(b), the authority to use "other than full and open competition" in the interest of the public may be invoked when none of the other authorities in FAR 6.302 apply. This authority is considered a "last resort" and is rarely used because it requires a high level of approval and justification. Specifically: It must be determined by the agency head that the use of this authority is necessary. A written determination must explain how it serves the public interest. This determination must be approved by a higher authority and published in the Federal Register.

Answer 38

A. Competitive acquisitions under the Section 8(a) program. Explanation: Under FAR 5.202, there are specific exceptions to the requirement for contracting officers to make notices of proposed contract actions available through the governmentwide point of entry (GPE), such as SAM.gov. However, competitive acquisitions under the Section 8(a) program are not exempt and must still be publicized unless another specific exception applies. Analysis of the Options: Competitive acquisitions under the Section 8(a) program: Incorrect (Not an exception). While sole-source acquisitions under Section 8(a) may qualify for exceptions under certain conditions, competitive 8(a) acquisitions do not automatically fall under these exceptions and must be publicized unless another FAR 5.202 exception applies. Acquisitions for utility services (other than telecommunications services) and only one source is available: Correct (Exception). Per FAR 5.202(a)(7), acquisitions for utility services where only one source is available are exempt from the notice requirement. Acquisitions required by a statute to be made from a specific source, such as a workshop for the blind under the rules of the Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled: Correct (Exception). Per FAR 5.202(a)(4), these acquisitions are exempt because the source is mandated by statute. An order placed under FAR Subpart 16.5: Correct (Exception). Orders under FAR Subpart 16.5 for Indefinite-Delivery Contracts are exempt from the requirement, as stated in FAR 5.202(a)(11).

Answer 39

C. Covered employee means an individual who performs an acquisition function closely associated with inherently governmental functions and is an employee of the contractor; or a subcontractor that is a self-employed individual treated as a covered employee of the contractor because there is no employer to whom such an individual could submit the required disclosures. Explanation: According to FAR 3.1101, a covered employee refers to an individual who performs acquisition functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions and is: An employee of the contractor, or A self-employed individual subcontractor who is treated as a covered employee because there is no employer to whom the individual could submit the required disclosures. This definition ensures that individuals performing these sensitive functions are subject to the same disclosure and compliance requirements as employees of the contractor.

Answer 40

The head of the contracting activity.

Answer 41

the price of the lowest domestic offer is determined to be unreasonable by the CO.

Answer 42

Cognizant Federal Agency Official

Answer 43

The Economy Act applies when more specific statutory authority does not exist.

Answer 44

Wage Rate Requirements (Construction)

Answer 45

Federal Energy Management Products

Answer 46

The government's requirement, the anticipated terms and conditions that will apply to the contract, the information required to be in the offeror's proposal, and factors that will be used to evaluate the proposal

Answer 47

Blanket purchase agreements

Answer 48

The Contracting Officer should publicize 15 days prior to solicitation.

Answer 49

When contract awards exceed $25,000

Answer 50

Environmentally Preferable

Answer 51

B. Critical and non-critical Explanation: Under FAR 46.203, contract items are classified as critical or non-critical based on the item's significance to the mission and the consequences of its failure. This classification guides the type and level of inspection and quality assurance required during contract performance. Critical items: These items require special attention and stringent quality controls because their failure could result in mission failure, injury, or significant loss. Non-critical items: These items do not have the same potential for severe consequences in case of failure and therefore require less stringent inspection and oversight. This technical classification ensures the appropriate allocation of resources for quality assurance based on the item's importance and risk.

Answer 52

A. Government firm-fixed price contract Explanation: Under FAR 51.101, contractors may be authorized to use government supply sources, such as GSA schedules, when performing work under certain contracts. Authorization is determined by the contracting officer when it is in the Government's interest. Government firm-fixed-price contracts are an example of contracts where contractors can be granted such authorization if it benefits the government. Analysis of Other Options: Government firm-fixed price contract: Correct. Contractors working under firm-fixed-price contracts can be authorized to use government supply sources when it aligns with the Government’s best interest. Contract under the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (known as AbilityOne): Incorrect. AbilityOne contracts are designed for organizations employing individuals with disabilities, and they operate under separate statutory requirements. These contracts do not typically involve authorization for contractors to use government supply sources. A negotiated contract with a contractor that has no other government cost reimbursement type contracts: Incorrect. The type of negotiation or the absence of other contracts is not a criterion for authorization under FAR 51.101. Time-and-materials contracts for repair of commercial equipment: Incorrect. While time-and-materials contracts may involve material purchases, using government supply sources is

Answer 53

C. A subcontract providing for payment on a fixed-price incentive basis Explanation: Under FAR 44.203(b), contracting officers may consent to certain types of subcontracts but are prohibited from consenting to others, particularly those that impose obligations on the Government or violate regulations. Here's how the options align with FAR guidance: A subcontract that makes the results of arbitration between the prime contractor and subcontractor binding on the Government: Not permitted. This would improperly obligate the Government to arbitration outcomes in which it has no direct role, violating FAR principles. A subcontract obligating the contracting officer to deal directly with the subcontractor: Not permitted. The Government maintains a contractual relationship only with the prime contractor and does not directly engage with subcontractors. A subcontract providing for payment on a fixed-price incentive basis: Permitted. Fixed-price incentive contracts are an acceptable contract type and may be used in subcontracts with contracting officer consent. A subcontract providing for payment on a cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost basis: Not permitted. This type of payment structure is explicitly prohibited under FAR 16.102(c) because it incentivizes increased costs without promoting efficiency or cost control.

Answer 54

D. 25 Explanation: Under FAR 41.103(a) and 40 U.S.C. 501, the General Services Administration (GSA) is authorized to contract for utility services for periods not exceeding 25 years. This extended contract period allows for stability and long-term planning in managing government utility needs, such as electricity, water, and natural gas.

Answer 55

True Explanation: Under FAR 25.1001, when applying an alternate to FAR 52.215-2 (Audit and Records—Negotiation) or FAR 52.215-5 (Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders—Commercial Products and Commercial Services) in the context of foreign acquisitions, the contracting officer must prepare a Determination and Findings (D&F).

Answer 56

B. Suspend action on the acquisition. Explanation: Under FAR 19.502-8, if a contracting officer (CO) rejects the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) recommendation to set aside an acquisition for small business, the SBA may appeal the decision to the head of the contracting activity (HCA). During the appeal process, the CO must suspend action on the acquisition until the appeal is resolved, unless: The HCA determines in writing that the acquisition must proceed to protect the Government's interests. Urgent and compelling circumstances exist that require continuing with the acquisition.

Answer 57

C. Disabled-minority-owned small business Explanation: Under FAR 19.2, the contracting officer must provide maximum practicable opportunities for participation in federal contracts to the following categories of small businesses: Veteran-owned small business (VOSB) HUBZone small business Service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) Small disadvantaged businesses (SDB), including those owned by minorities.

Answer 58

D. M Explanation: Under FAR 15.204-1, Section M of the Uniform Contract Format (UCF) is designated for "Evaluation Factors for Award". This section outlines the criteria that will be used to evaluate proposals and make the award decision. It is critical for ensuring transparency and fairness in the procurement process. Breakdown of Relevant Sections: Section A: Information such as the solicitation cover page and basic details. Section J: Attachments such as exhibits or other supporting documentation. Section K: Representations, certifications, and other statements of offerors. Section M: Evaluation factors for award, including technical, cost, and past performance criteria. Key Takeaway: The evaluation factors for award are detailed in Section M of the Uniform Contract Format (UCF), as specified in FAR 15.204-1.

Answer 59

The need to revise the offeror's proposal.

Answer 60

D. Multiple Award Schedule Program Explanation: The Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) Program, as referenced in FAR 8.402, is also known as the Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) Program. This program allows federal agencies to purchase commercial products and services from pre-approved vendors at negotiated prices, streamlining the procurement process and promoting efficiency.

Answer 61

A. Defense Priorities and Allocation System (DPAS). Explanation: Under FAR 11.600, the Defense Priorities and Allocation System (DPAS) is a Department of Commerce regulation that supports approved national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy programs. It allows the prioritization of contracts and orders necessary to meet national defense requirements, ensuring timely delivery of critical goods and services. DPAS is implemented under the authority of the Defense Production Act and is designed to support federal priorities in times of emergency or national defense needs.

Answer 62

of at least average, fair, or medium-grade quality.

Answer 63

A. the Government, Contractor Explanation: According to FAR 4.2202(b), the prohibition on a ByteDance Covered Application, such as TikTok, applies to: Any information technology owned or managed by the Government. Any information technology used or provided by the contractor under a federal contract, unless an exception is granted. This prohibition ensures that no covered application is present on IT systems connected to federal operations, safeguarding against potential cybersecurity risks. Key Takeaway: The prohibition applies to information technology owned or managed by the Government and IT used or provided by the Contractor under a federal contract, as stated in FAR 4.2202(b).

Answer 64

D. The Contracting Officer may use the combined synopsis and solicitation procedure. Explanation: Under FAR 5.203, contracting officers are generally required to transmit a notice of proposed contract actions to the governmentwide point of entry (GPE) at least 15 days before issuing a solicitation or negotiating with only one source. However, for acquisitions of commercial products or commercial services, contracting officers may streamline the process by using the combined synopsis and solicitation procedure described in FAR 12.603. This allows the contracting officer to issue a single document for both the synopsis and the solicitation.

Answer 65

. One level above the contracting officer. Explanation: Under FAR 6.304(a)(2), the justification for other than full and open competition for a proposed contract exceeding $750,000 but not exceeding $15 million must be approved in writing by an official one level above the contracting officer. This requirement ensures additional oversight and accountability for justifications at this dollar range. Analysis of Other Options: The head of contracting activity: Incorrect. This official approves justifications for proposed contracts exceeding $15 million but not exceeding $75 million, as stated in FAR 6.304(a)(3). The advocate for competition for the procuring activity: Incorrect. The advocate for competition is responsible for promoting competition but does not approve justifications. The contracting officer: Incorrect. The contracting officer may only approve justifications for contracts not exceeding $750,000, as per FAR 6.304(a)(1). One level above the contracting officer: Correct. This is the approval authority for justifications for contracts over $750,000 but not exceeding $15 million, per FAR 6.304(a)

Answer 66

C. Covered employee means an individual who performs an acquisition function closely associated with inherently governmental functions and is an employee of the contractor; or a subcontractor that is a self-employed individual treated as a covered employee of the contractor because there is no employer to whom such an individual could submit the required disclosures. Explanation: According to FAR 3.1101, a covered employee is defined as: An individual who performs an acquisition function closely associated with inherently governmental functions, and Is: An employee of the contractor, or A self-employed subcontractor treated as a covered employee because there is no employer to whom such an individual could submit required disclosures. This definition ensures that individuals who perform acquisition-related tasks, which are critical to the government's functions, comply with ethical standards and reporting requirements.

Answer 67

When acquiring information technology services, solicitations must describe any minimum experience or educational requirement for proposed contractor personnel.

Answer 68

The head of the contracting activity.

Answer 69

Unlimited rights

Answer 70

Total price

Answer 71

Cognizant Federal Agency Official

Answer 72

Cognizant Federal Agency Official

Answer 73

Any contract for public utility services.

Answer 74

GSA Advantage!

Answer 75

Public interest.

Answer 76

Blanket purchase agreements

Answer 77

the Government, Contractor

Answer 78

15 is the part, 5 is the subpart, 06 is the section, and a is the paragraph.

Answer 79

The Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General Services, and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Answer 80

D. $150,000 Explanation: Under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, as implemented in FAR 33.207(a), contractors are required to certify claims when the total amount of the claim exceeds $100,000. However, this threshold has been adjusted for inflation, and the current certification requirement applies to claims exceeding $150,000. Certification Requirements: The certification must state that: The claim is made in good faith. The supporting data are accurate and complete to the best of the contractor’s knowledge. The amount requested accurately reflects the contract adjustment for which the contractor believes the government is liable. The certifier is authorized to certify the claim on behalf of the contractor.

Answer 81

The correct answer is: C. A subcontract providing for payment on a fixed-price incentive basis Explanation: Under FAR 44.203(b), a contracting officer may consent to certain types of subcontracts while adhering to the policies and standards for subcontracting. However, the following subcontracts are prohibited or would create unacceptable risks: A subcontract that makes the results of arbitration between the prime contractor and subcontractor binding on the Government: Not permitted. This type of subcontract improperly binds the Government to arbitration outcomes in which it has no participation. A subcontract obligating the contracting officer to deal directly with the subcontractor: Not permitted. The Government's contractual relationship is solely with the prime contractor, not with subcontractors. A subcontract providing for payment on a fixed-price incentive basis: Permitted. Fixed-price incentive contracts are an acceptable contract type under FAR and may be used in subcontracts, provided the contracting officer consents if required. A subcontract providing for payment on a cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost basis: Not permitted. This type of payment arrangement is explicitly prohibited under FAR 16.102(c) because it incentivizes increased costs without promoting efficiency.

Answer 82

D. Service Contract Act Explanation: The Service Contract Act (SCA), formally known as the McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act, requires contractors performing service contracts for the federal government to pay their employees: Minimum wages determined by prevailing wage rates in the locality. Fringe benefits, such as health insurance, retirement benefits, and vacation pay. The SCA applies to contracts exceeding $2,500 and ensures fair compensation and working conditions for employees providing services under government contracts. Analysis of Other Options: Davis-Bacon Act: Incorrect. The Davis-Bacon Act applies to construction contracts and establishes prevailing wage rates for laborers and mechanics working on federal or federally assisted construction projects. Walsh-Healy Act: Incorrect. The Walsh-Healy Public Contracts Act applies to supply contracts exceeding $15,000 and requires contractors to pay prevailing wages, maintain safe working conditions, and prohibit child and convict labor. Equal Opportunity Act: Incorrect. This act prohibits discrimination in employment but does not specifically address wages or fringe benefits. Service Contract Act: Correct. The SCA ensures minimum wages, fringe benefits, and other fair working conditions for employees performing services on federal contracts.

Answer 83

. Acquisitions under simplified acquisition procedures. Explanation: The policies and procedures for trade agreements under FAR 25.400(a) and FAR 25.401(a) generally apply to acquisitions above specific thresholds outlined in the trade agreements. However, exceptions include: Acquisitions set aside for small businesses: Exempt because trade agreements do not apply to set-aside acquisitions. Acquisitions from the AbilityOne program: Exempt because AbilityOne is a mandatory source of supply under FAR 8.7, and trade agreements do not apply. Acquisitions of end products for resale: Exempt because resale products are excluded from trade agreement requirements.

Answer 84

C. Purchases under the AbilityOne program (41 U.S.C. chapter 85). Explanation: According to FAR 29.202 and the referenced sections of the U.S. Tax Code, certain situations exempt contracts from special-fuels excise taxes. Examples include: The exclusive use of any State or political subdivision, including the District of Columbia (26 U.S.C. 4041 and 4221): Exempt from excise taxes. A nonprofit educational organization (26 U.S.C. 4041 and 4221): Exempt from excise taxes. Emergency vehicles (26 U.S.C. 4053 and 4064(b)(1)(C)): Exempt from excise taxes. However, purchases under the AbilityOne program are not specifically mentioned as exempt from excise taxes under FAR 29.202 or the related tax codes. While the AbilityOne program involves mandatory source requirements for certain supplies and services, it does not inherently qualify for excise tax exemptions.

Answer 85

D. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act Explanation: The Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (CWHSSA), referenced in FAR 22.403-3, requires that laborers and mechanics employed on federal contracts be paid time and a half for overtime work, defined as work exceeding 40 hours in a week. This act applies to contracts exceeding $150,000 that involve the employment of laborers and mechanics. Analysis of Other Options: Wage Rate Requirements statute: Incorrect. This refers to the Davis-Bacon Act, which establishes prevailing wage rates for laborers and mechanics but does not address overtime pay. Kickbacks statute: Incorrect. The Anti-Kickback Act prohibits kickbacks from subcontractors to prime contractors or contracting officers but is unrelated to overtime or wage requirements. Minimum Wage Act: Incorrect. While minimum wage laws establish baseline pay requirements, they do not specifically mandate overtime pay. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act: Correct. This act mandates overtime pay for laborers and mechanics on applicable federal contracts, as stated in FAR 22.403-3.

Answer 86

B. Suspend action on the acquisition. Explanation: Under FAR 19.502-8, if a contracting officer (CO) rejects the Small Business Administration's (SBA) recommendation to set aside an acquisition for small business, the SBA may appeal the CO's decision to the head of the contracting activity (HCA). During this appeal process, the CO must suspend action on the acquisition, unless: The HCA determines in writing that proceeding with the acquisition is necessary to protect the Government's interests. Urgent and compelling circumstances exist that justify continuing with the acquisition. This ensures that the SBA’s appeal is given proper consideration before moving forward.

Answer 87

C. Silver Explanation: Under FAR 23.704, agencies are required to acquire EPEAT® Silver-registered electronic products at a minimum. The Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT®) is a global ecolabel that certifies the environmental performance of electronic products. The Silver registration level represents a baseline standard for environmental attributes, ensuring compliance with federal sustainability goals. Agencies are encouraged to procure higher-level (e.g., Gold or Platinum) registered products when feasible, but Silver is the mandatory minimum requirement. Key Takeaway: Agencies must acquire EPEAT® Silver-registered electronic products at a minimum, as required by FAR 23.704, while striving to purchase products with higher environmental performance when possible.

Answer 88

C. Basic Ordering Agreements Explanation: According to FAR 16.703, a Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) is a written instrument of understanding between a government agency and a contractor. A BOA: Contains terms and conditions that apply to future orders. Describes the supplies or services to be provided. Specifies methods for pricing, issuing, and delivering future orders. A BOA is not a contract by itself but provides a framework for issuing contracts more efficiently when specific requirements arise. Analysis of Other Options: Indefinite-Delivery Arrangements: Incorrect. This is not a recognized term in the FAR. Instead, the FAR discusses Indefinite-Delivery Contracts (IDCs) in Subpart 16.5. Blanket Purchase Agreements: Incorrect. A Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) is similar but applies to simplified acquisition procedures under FAR Part 13. BPAs are not the same as BOAs and are used for repetitive needs for supplies or services. Basic Ordering Agreements: Correct. BOAs are agreements defined under FAR 16.703 to streamline future orders. Fixed-Price Contracts: Incorrect. A fixed-price contract is a fully executed contract type with fixed terms and pricing, not an instrument for future orders.

Answer 89

D. The need to revise the offeror's proposal. Explanation: Under FAR 15.102(c), the purpose of oral presentations is to streamline the evaluation process by providing the government with an efficient method to assess an offeror’s understanding of the requirements, technical approach, or other key aspects of their proposal. Factors to consider include: The impact on the efficiency of the acquisition: Oral presentations should enhance the efficiency of the procurement process. The impact (including cost) on small business: Consideration must be given to the resources required for small businesses to prepare and participate. The government's ability to adequately evaluate the information: The government must be able to effectively evaluate the information provided during the presentation. However, oral presentations are not intended to revise or modify an offeror’s proposal. The purpose is to provide clarity, elaboration, or supplementary details—not to change the content of the submitted proposal.

Answer 90

A. Competitive acquisitions under the Section 8(a) program. Explanation: Under FAR 5.202, contracting officers are generally required to make notices of proposed contract actions available through the Governmentwide Point of Entry (GPE), such as SAM.gov, unless a specific exception applies. The listed exceptions include: Acquisitions for utility services (other than telecommunications services) and only one source is available: Exempt under FAR 5.202(a)(7) because only one source exists for the service. Acquisitions required by a statute to be made from a specific source, such as a workshop for the blind under the rules of the Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled: Exempt under FAR 5.202(a)(4) because the source is mandated by law. An order placed under FAR Subpart 16.5: Exempt under FAR 5.202(a)(11) for orders under indefinite-delivery contracts. However, competitive acquisitions under the Section 8(a) program are not exempt from the GPE notification requirement. While sole-source awards under Section 8(a) may qualify for exceptions in some cases, competitive 8(a) acquisitions must be publicized.

Answer 91

A. Recommend to the Contracting Officer a system of personal accountability for competition, which may include the use of recognition and awards to motivate the procurement staff. Explanation: Under FAR 6.502, competition advocates are responsible for promoting and increasing competition in federal contracting. Their duties include: Reviewing the contracting operations of the agency to identify and report barriers to competition to the agency senior procurement executive and the chief acquisition officer. Preparing and submitting annual reports on competition efforts to the agency senior procurement executive and the chief acquisition officer. Recommending goals and plans for increasing competition on a fiscal year basis. However, recommending a system of personal accountability or awards to the Contracting Officer is not listed as a responsibility of competition advocates in FAR 6.502.

Answer 92

The head of the contracting activity.

Answer 93

the date agreed upon by the contracting parties

Answer 94

within 45 days from its receipt by the Government

Answer 95

A subcontract providing for payment on a ?fixed-price incentive basis

Answer 96

Service Contract Act

Answer 97

The date the action is signed, rather than the effective date

Answer 98

Proposed contract termination for the convenience of the Government in an estimated amount of $30,000.

Answer 99

pecial construction and printing forms Explanation: According to FAR 53.106, contracting offices may request exceptions to standard forms for special construction and printing, where the standard forms do not meet the unique needs of the office. Other scenarios such as overprinting, computer-generated forms, and continuation sheets are more likely adaptations or modifications allowed for existing forms rather than reasons for requesting exceptions.

Answer 100

he FAR Secretariat Explanation: According to FAR 53.108, individuals or organizations not affiliated with an executive agency can submit recommendations for new forms to the FAR Secretariat. The FAR Secretariat is responsible for managing the Federal Acquisition Regulation and serves as the appropriate entity to receive suggestions for new forms or changes to existing ones.

Answer 101

ritical and non-critical Explanation: According to FAR 46.203, contract items are technically classified as critical or non-critical. This classification is based on the significance of the item to the mission or end-use, as well as the consequences of a failure. Critical items are those that could cause serious consequences if they fail, while non-critical items are less significant in terms of potential failure impacts. The other options do not reflect the technical classification as stated in the FAR: Complex and non-complex: This is not a FAR classification. Commercial and military-federal: These terms relate to procurement categories, not technical classifications. Supply or service: This refers to types of contracts, not item classification.

Answer 102

Cognizant Auditor Explanation: According to FAR 30.202-7, the Cognizant Auditor is responsible for conducting reviews of Disclosure Statements to determine whether they are current, accurate, and complete. The Cognizant Auditor plays a key role in ensuring compliance with cost accounting standards and verifying the adequacy of the Disclosure Statements. Why not the other options? Acquiring Agency: While the acquiring agency is involved in procurement, it does not perform the detailed review of Disclosure Statements. Cognizant Federal Agency Official: This role involves oversight and coordination but does not include the technical responsibility of reviewing Disclosure Statements. Cognizant Officer: This is not a specific r

Answer 103

$2,500 Explanation: According to FAR 22.6, which addresses the Service Contract Labor Standards (formerly the Service Contract Act), the Act applies to contracts over $2,500 for services performed in the United States using service employees. Contracts below this threshold are not subject to the provisions of the Service Contract Labor Standards.

Answer 104

asic Ordering Agreements Explanation: According to FAR 16.703, Basic Ordering Agreements (BOAs) are written instruments of understanding that include terms and conditions applicable to future orders. They describe the supplies or services to be provided and methods for pricing, issuing, and delivering future orders. However, a BOA itself is not a contract; it requires the issuance of orders for any binding agreement. Why not the other options? Indefinite-Delivery Arrangements: This is a general category for contract types like indefinite-quantity contracts, but it is not the specific instrument described in FAR 16.703. Blanket Purchase Agreements: While BPAs also facilitate simplified acquisitions, they are governed under FAR 13.303, not FAR 16.703, and do not include all the specific details outlined in a BOA. Fixed-Price Contracts: These are a type of contract where pricing terms are established but do not inherently describe mechanisms for future orders.

Answer 105

Time & Material Explanation: Among the listed options, Time & Material (T&M) contracts put the most risk on the buyer. In a T&M contract, the buyer agrees to pay for the contractor’s actual labor hours at predetermined rates, as well as the cost of materials. This structure places significant risk on the buyer because the total cost is not fixed and depends on the time and materials required, which can lead to cost overruns. Why not the other options? Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF): The buyer assumes substantial risk because they reimburse all allowable costs, plus a fixed fee. However, this type of contract is less risky for the buyer than T&M because costs are controlled through limitations and close monitoring. Firm Fixed Price (FFP): This type puts the least risk on the buyer, as the contractor agrees to deliver the required work for a fixed price. Any cost overruns are borne by the contractor. Fixed-Price with Incentive Fee (FPIF): The buyer assumes some risk, but it is shared with the contractor through incentives to control costs and meet performance goals. The risk is still lower than in a T&M contract.

Answer 106

Multiple Award Schedule Program Explanation: According to FAR 8.402, the Federal Supply Schedule Program is commonly referred to as the Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) Program. This program provides federal agencies with a simplified process for acquiring commercial products and services at pre-negotiated prices and terms. Why not the other options? Central Contractor Registry (CCR): The CCR was a system for contractor registration, but it is now part of the System for Award Management (SAM) and unrelated to the Federal Supply Schedule Program. E-Buy Program: E-Buy is an online procurement tool associated with the Federal Supply Schedule, but it is not the name of the program itself. Source-Supply List (SSL): This is not a recognized term in the FAR related to the Federal Supply Schedule Program.

Answer 107

he advocate for competition for the procuring activity. Explanation: According to FAR 6.304(a)(2), the justification for other than full and open competition for a proposed contract over $750,000 but not exceeding $15 million must be approved in writing by the advocate for competition for the procuring activity or a similar designated official. Why not the other options? The head of contracting activity: This official is required for contracts exceeding $15 million but not exceeding $75 million. The contracting officer: The contracting officer approves justifications for contracts up to $750,000, not above this threshold. One level above the contracting officer: This is not specified as the approving authority in the context of justifications for other than full and open competition.

Answer 108

When acquiring information technology services, solicitations must describe any minimum experience or educational requirement for proposed contractor personnel.

Answer 109

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Answer 110

Delivery payments

Answer 111

Federal Energy Management Program

Answer 112

Multiple Award Schedule Program

Answer 113

When contract awards exceed $25,000

Answer 114

the Government, Contractor

Answer 115

Blanket purchase agreements

Answer 116

One level above the contracting officer. Explanation: According to FAR 6.304(a)(2), the justification for other than full and open competition for a proposed contract over $750,000 but not exceeding $15 million must be approved in writing by one level above the contracting officer. This ensures a higher level of oversight for such justifications. Why not the other options? The head of contracting activity: This official is required for contracts exceeding $15 million but not exceeding $75 million (FAR 6.304(a)(3)). The advocate for competition for the procuring activity: This role is not specified for approving justifications within the $750,000 to $15 million range. The contracting officer: This official approves justifications for contracts not exceeding $750,000 (FAR 6.304(a)(1)).

Answer 117

Resembles the substance of a competitive acquisition. Explanation: According to FAR 6.3, justifications for using other than full and open competition must meet specific criteria outlined in FAR 6.302. Valid considerations include: Demonstration of unique capability specific to the services proposed (FAR 6.302-1): This applies when only one responsible source can provide the services due to unique capabilities. Substantial duplication of cost unrecoverable through competition (FAR 6.302-2): This criterion applies if competition would result in unrecoverable and significant duplication of costs. Schedule impact causing unacceptable delays (FAR 6.302-2): This criterion applies when urgency or schedule delays would severely affect the agency.

Answer 118

A micropurchase using the electronic funds transfer method for payment Explanation: According to FAR 4.1102, prospective contractors are generally required to be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database prior to award, with some exceptions. For a micropurchase using the electronic funds transfer (EFT) method, registration in SAM is required because EFT payment details are typically recorded in SAM. Why not the other options? A contract awarded by a deployed contracting officer in the course of military operations: This is an exception where SAM registration is not required, as provided under FAR 4.1102(a)(4). A contract with an individual for performance outside the United States and its outlying areas: FAR 4.1102(a)(3) exempts contracts performed outside the United States and its outlying areas if SAM registration is impractical. A contract for emergency operations in response to a natural disaster: FAR 4.1102(a)(5) provides an exemption for contracts supporting emergency operations, including those responding to natural disasters.

Answer 119

Covered employee means an individual who performs an acquisition function closely associated with inherently governmental functions and is an employee of the contractor; or a subcontractor that is a self-employed individual treated as a covered employee of the contractor because there is no employer to whom such an individual could submit the required disclosures. Explanation: According to FAR 3.11, a "covered employee" is defined as an individual who performs acquisition functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions. This includes employees of contractors and self-employed subcontractors when there is no other employer to whom such an individual could submit the required disclosures. This definition emphasizes the relationship between the individual's role (performing acquisition functions) and their employment status, ensuring they are subject to disclosure and oversight requirements.

Answer 120

Federal Supply Schedules Explanation: According to FAR 51.101, contracting officers may authorize contractors to use Federal Supply Schedules (also referred to as the General Services Administration (GSA) schedules) when it is in the Government’s interest and the supplies or services are required to perform a government contract. Federal Supply Schedules provide contractors access to pre-negotiated pricing and terms for commercial products and services. Why not the other options? A contract using Federal Prison Industries: Federal Prison Industries (FPI) provides products and services to the government, but contractors are not typically authorized to use FPI supply sources. Government-wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs): GWACs are contracts for acquiring IT services and solutions, but this is not what FAR 51.101 addresses. A contract under the "AbilityOne" Program: The AbilityOne Program is designed to provide employment for people with disabilities through nonprofit agencies, and it does not typically authorize contractors to use government supply sources.

Answer 121

Critical and non-critical Explanation: According to FAR 46.203, contract items are technically classified as critical or non-critical. This classification is based on the item's importance to the mission or end-use and the potential consequences of failure. Critical items are those where a failure could result in severe consequences, while non-critical items are less significant in terms of their impact. Why not the other options? Complex and non-complex: While items might be described this way informally, it is not a classification used in FAR 46.203. Commercial and military-federal: These terms relate more to procurement categories and are not the technical classifications referenced in FAR 46.203. Supply or service: This refers to the type of contract, not the technical classification of items.

Answer 122

10 Explanation: According to FAR 41.103(a), the General Services Administration (GSA) is authorized under 40 U.S.C. 501 to contract for utility services for periods not exceeding 10 years. This authority is specific to utility services and allows for long-term planning and cost management in government utility contracts. Let me know if you need further clarificati

Answer 123

Wage Rate Requirements (Construction) Explanation: The Wage Rate Requirements (Construction), commonly referred to as the Davis-Bacon Act, stipulates that federal contracts in excess of $2,000 for the construction, alteration, or repair of public buildings or public works must include a clause requiring contractors to pay laborers and mechanics no less than the prevailing wage rates as determined by the Secretary of Labor. This requirement ensures fair wages based on local standards. Why not the other options? Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act: This act addresses overtime pay and safety standards, not prevailing wage rates. Minimum Wage Act: While this act mandates minimum wages, it does not specifically apply to prevailing wages on federally funded construction contracts. Kickbacks statute: This statute relates to prohibiting kickbacks and does not address wage requirements.

Answer 124

Suspend action on the acquisition. Explanation: According to FAR 19.502-8, if a contracting officer (CO) rejects the Small Business Administration (SBA)’s recommendation to set aside an acquisition, the CO must notify the SBA of the rejection in writing. At that point, the SBA can appeal the decision to the head of the contracting activity (HCA). During this appeal process, the contracting officer is required to suspend action on the acquisition until the issue is resolved or the appeal is denied. Why not the other options? Proceed with full and open competition: This cannot occur until the SBA's appeal process is complete. Complete a fair and reasonable price determination: While important, this is unrelated to the process of handling the SBA's recommendations and appeals. Complete an SBA override signed by the next higher person in the CO's chain of command: This is not a recognized step in FAR 19.502-8.

Answer 125

Assurances that the offeror will include the clause at 52.219-6. Explanation: According to FAR 19.704, an acceptable subcontracting plan must include various elements, and one of them is assurances that the offeror will include the clause at 52.219-6 (Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside) in all subcontracts that offer further subcontracting opportunities. This ensures that small businesses have opportunities to participate in subcontracting. Why are the other options correct but less complete for this question? A description of the method used to develop the subcontracting goals: This is a valid part of a subcontracting plan under FAR 19.704(a)(3). The description of the method used to identify potential sources for solicitation purposes: This is also a valid requirement under FAR 19.704(a)(4). A statement of the total dollars planned to be subcontracted: This is part of the subcontracting plan under FAR 19.704(a)(1).

Answer 126

Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act Explanation: The Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (CWHSSA) requires that laborers and mechanics employed on federal contracts must be paid time and a half for overtime work, defined as hours worked in excess of 40 hours in a workweek. This law applies to certain federal contracts exceeding $100,000 and ensures fair compensation for overtime. Why not the other options? Wage Rate Requirements statute: This (Davis-Bacon Act) pertains to prevailing wage rates for construction projects, not overtime pay. Kickbacks statute: This addresses prohibiting kickbacks on public contracts, not labor hours or overtime. Minimum Wage Act: This ensures a minimum wage is paid but does not address overtime specifically.

Answer 127

Basic Ordering Agreements Explanation: According to FAR 16.703, Basic Ordering Agreements (BOAs) are written instruments of understanding that contain terms and conditions applicable to future orders. BOAs outline the supplies or services to be provided and establish methods for pricing, issuing, and delivering future orders. However, a BOA itself is not a contract; it becomes binding only when specific orders are issued under it. Why not the other options? Indefinite-Delivery Arrangements: While these contracts are used for ongoing needs, they are not specifically defined as instruments of understanding under FAR 16.703. Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs): BPAs, covered under FAR 13.303, are similar but used for simplified acquisitions and governed by different rules than BOAs. Fixed-Price Contracts: These are binding contracts with fixed pricing terms and are not designed for establishing future orders.

Answer 128

GSA Advantage! Explanation: GSA Advantage! is an online shopping service provided by the General Services Administration (GSA) that allows federal ordering activities to search for specific items (e.g., national stock numbers, part numbers, or common names), review delivery options, and place orders directly with schedule contractors. It is a key tool for purchasing items available under the Federal Supply Schedule. Why not the other options? E-Buy: This is a separate online procurement tool for requesting and submitting quotes for services and products under the Federal Supply Schedule but is not primarily a shopping service. SAM.gov: This is a centralized system for managing government procurement data and contractor registrations but does not serve as an online shopping platform. Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): This refers to the overarching program that provides access to pre-negotiated contracts but does not describe the online shopping service itself.

Final Q&A Flashcards

Wrong answers