Chpt 5: Measurement Concepts (PSY302) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Def: reliability

A

the consistency or stability of a measure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In order for something to be _______, it needs to not _______ from one reading to the next.

A

reliable, fluctuate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Def: true score

A

the real, or true value on a given variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Def: measurement error

A

the degree to which a measurement scores deviates from the true score value.
An unreliable measure of intelligence has considerable measurement of error.
To test this, it’s in greater variability by the person to whom the unreliable test was administered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reliability is most likely to be achieved when researchers use __________ measurements in their procedures.

A

careful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In order to ________ reliability, you must make __________ measures.

A

increase, multiple

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Def: Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient

A

a common method of calculation a correlation coefficient used with ratio & interval scale data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the Pearson Product symbol?

A

r

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Def: test-retest reliability

A

assessed by measuring the same ppl at 2pts in time & comparing the results.
A high correlation between test & retest indicates reliability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Def: alternate forms reliability

A

uses 2 forms of the same test given to the same ppl at 2 points in time.
This avoids issues with participants remembering & repeating earlier responses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If many participants have 2 very similar scores, you can conclude that the measure reflects ________ scores instead of measurement _______.

A

true, error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Def: internal consistency reliability

A

the assessment of reliability using responses at only 1 pt in time.
Bc all items measure the same variable, they should yield similar or consistent results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Def: split-half reliability

A

the correlation of the total score on ½ of the test with the total score on the other.
Both halves are created by randomly dividing items into 2 groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What’s one con to split-half reliability?

A

One con of this is that this is based on only 1 of many possible ways of dividing the measures into halves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A _______ correlation indicates that the questions on the test are measuring the _______ thing.

A

high, same

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Def: item-total correlation

A

provides info abt each individual value.
A large number of correlation coefficients are produced.
provides info abt each individual value.

17
Q

Def: interrater reliability

A

the extent to which raters agree in their observations.
A high correlation indicates raters agree in their ratings.
A commonly used indicator is Cohen’s kappa.

18
Q

How to Test-retest Reliability:

A

A measure is taken 2x. The correlation of a score at time 1 with the score at time 2 represents test-retest reliability.
The correlation between 2 versions of a measure is called the alternative forms reliability.

19
Q

Def: Cronbach’s Alpha

A

correlation of each item on the measure with every other item on the measure. Also known as the Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient

20
Q

What’s one thing that reliability doesn’t account for?

A

It doesn’t tell us whether we have a good measure of the variables of interest.

21
Q

Def: face validity

A

the content of the measure appears to reflect the construct being measured.
The simplest way to argue that a measure is valid is to suggest that the measure appears to assess the intended variable accurately by face validity.

22
Q

Face validity isn’t ___________; it involves only a judgment of whether given the theoretical def of the variable, the content of the measure appears to actually _________ the variable.

A

sophisticated, measure

23
Q

Def: content validity

A

the content of the measure is linked to the universe of content that defines the construct.
Ex: depression would have content that links to each of the single symptoms that would be defined in the DSM5.

24
Q

Both face & content validity focuses on ________ whether the content of a measure _________ the meaning of the construct being measured.

A

assessing, reflects

25
Q

Def: criterion

A

The behavior when it comes to validity

26
Q

Def: predictive validity

A

scores on the measure predict behavior on a criterion measured at a future time.
This is important when studying measures that are designed to improve our ability to make predictions.
This is focused on the measure of a future behavior or outcome.

27
Q

Def: Concurrent validity

A

scores on the measure are related to a criterion measured at the same time.
A common method is to study whether 2(+) groups of ppl differ on the measure in expected ways.
Studies how ppl who score either low or high on the measure behave in diff situations.

28
Q

Def: convergent validity

A

scores on the ensure are related to other measures of the same or similar constructs.

29
Q

Def: discriminant validity

A

scores on the measure are not related to other measures that are theoretically diff.
This measure should discriminate between the construct being measured & other unrelated constructs.

30
Q

Def: reactivity

A

a potential issue when measuring behavior.

31
Q

A measure is said to be _______ if the awareness of being measured ________ an individual’s behavior.

A

reactive, changes

32
Q

4 kinds of measurement scales

A

Nominal scales
Ordinal scales
Interval scales
Ratio scales

33
Q

Def: nominal scales

A

no numerical or quantitative properties; categories or groups simply differ from one another.

34
Q

Def: ordinal scale

A

llow us to order the levels of the variables under study.
Ex: letter grades, rating (S, A, B, C, D, E, F) scales, and the five star scale.

35
Q

What’s one issue with ordinal scales?

A

One issue with ordinal scales is that while they provide rank-ordered categories, they don’t provide any info abt the distance between the categories.

36
Q

Def: interval scale

A

are numerical scales in which the intervals between numbers on the scale are equal in size.
Ex: your household thermostat.

37
Q

Def: ratio scales

A

have an absolute zero pt that indicates the absence of the variable being measured.
Ex: length, weight, or time.
Used in behavioral sciences when variables that involve physical measures are being studied specifically time measures like ration time, rate of responding, & duration of response