Chapter 1 Flashcards
what are the 7 ways intimate relationships are unique from casual ones
knowledge, interdependence, caring, trust, responsiveness, mutuality, and commitment.
interdependance is … (they often affect each other), …. (they have meaningful impact on each other),… (they influence each other in many different ways), and … (they influence each other over long periods of time).
frequent, strong, diverse, enduring
The qualities that make these close ties tolerable are …3
caring, trust, and responsiveness.
… is powerfully rewarding, and the perception that our partners recognize, understand, and support our needs and wishes is a core ingredient of our very best relationships
Responsiveness
what is the difference between mutuality and interdependence
mutuality= they recognize their close connection and think of themselves as “us” instead of “me” and “him” interdep= the extent to which they need and influence each other
what is the significant moment in a developing relationship when new partners first acknowledge their attachment to each other
the transition from me to us
intimate partners are ordinarily…. That is, they expect their partnerships to continue indefinitely, and they invest the time, effort, and resources that are needed to realize that goal
committed
are all 7 needed for intimacy to occur
no but feel closest when they all line up and most meaningful this way
intimacy can also vary enormously over the course of a long relationship.
t
we need frequent, pleasant interactions with intimate partners in lasting, caring relationships if we’re to function normally :T
human need to belong
Our need to belong is presumed to necessitate “…..”
regular social contact with those to whom one feels connected
how many intimate relationships do we need
when the need to belong is satisfied our drive for more relationships is reduced= quality over quantity
who our partners are matters greatly
f just need to feel like we belong supported by the ease with which we form relationships with others and from the tenacity with which we then resist the dissolution of our existing social ties
who is being along for long periods of time so stressful
anything that threatens our sense of connection to other people can be hard to take
belonging is tied to health
t even influences mortality
Our mental and physical health is also affected by the … of our connections to others
quality
how does a lack of intimacy relate to social problems
a lack of intimacy can both cause such psychological problems and make them worse
better marriages only helped peoples illnesses when they were less severe
f 3 times more likely to be alive 15 y later
Why should we need intimacy so much?
the need to belong evolved over eons, gradually becoming a natural tendency in all human beings
how many people married in 1965 vs now
95% vs less than 80% 50% presently married
people are marrying later: what age?
27 and 29
3 new marriage stats
- less marriage, marrying later and more cohabiting, less married parents, more divorce, working moms
In 2015, … percent of the babies born in the United States had unmarried mothers
40
About …. of all marriages end in divorce, a failure rate that’s 2-and-a-half times higher than it was when your grandparents married
one-half
is divorce still on the rise
the divorce rate has been slowly decreasing for couples with college degrees but it remains high and unchanged for people with less education
prejudice and discrimination against those who choose to remain single and opt not to devote themselves to a primary romantic relationship:T
singlism
Middle-aged Americans who have never married are … more likely than those who are married to die an early death
two-and-half times
how many singles prefer being unattached than in a relationship
4%
so do people need a soulmate to be happy and healthy?
no not everyone wants or needs a constant companion or soulmate
do the people who do marry today hold it in the same regard?
no we’re less likely to consider it a solemn, life-long commitment (less norms to get and stay married)
do changes in cultural standards matter
yes provide foundation for our relationships they shape our expectations and define the patterns we think to be normal.
does cohabiting increase chances of successful marrying
not if they didn’t already have that plan, cohabitation increases a couple’s risk that they will later divorce
why does cohabitation increases a couple’s risk that they will later divorce
they have been living together from younger ages
less committed to each other (keeping options open)
cohabitation is more tumultuous and volatile than marriage usually is
t more conflict and physical aggression
the longer people cohabit, the less enthusiastic about marriage—and the more accepting of divorce—they become. does this mean they break up sooner
no they become les likely to marry but also don’t break up
5 years down the road, cohabitating couples are just as likely to break up as they were when they moved in Page 11together. is this the same for married couples
f longer marriage less likely to div
so why do cohabiters fare worse
casual cohabitation that is intended to test the partners’ compatibility seems to undermine the positive attitudes toward marriage, and the determination to make a marriage work, that support marital success
if you are engaged then cohabit does this remove the negative effects
no even they tend to be less happy with their relationships than those who marry without cohabiting first
why are their fewer marriages and fewer lasting marriages
bus cohabiting is accepted as trial run but corrodes relationship
why are the norms governing our relationships today different
economics
individualism
new technologies
how do economics influence norms
Societies tend to harbor more single people, tolerate more divorces, and support a later age of marriage the more industrialized and affluent they become
how many American wives earn more than their partners
1 in 3
what’s wrong with the rise in individualism
more materialistic, less trusting, and less concerned with others than our grandparents were. And arguably, this focus on our own happiness has led us to expect more personal gratification from our intimate partnerships. will pursue divorce for our own right
how do divorce rates in collectivist cultures compare
much lower bus of collective sense of self
what new technologies influence relational norms
art insemination
birth control (birth rate all time low)
com technologies
how many young adults sext
20% (who also found that 23 percent of the time, those who receive a sext share it with two or three others)
COULPES ARE HAPPIER IF THEy go through each others phones
t
what are the problems with Facebook and texting in relationships
need to establish more guidelines, make it official making the breakup public and embarrassing, more potential for conflict, temptation
T: the frequent interruptions of their interactions that are caused by their various technological devices
TECHNOFERENCE
T: which occurs when one partner snubs another by focusing on a phone—is particularly obnoxious
phubbing
only the use of a smartphone reduces the quality of the conversation of two people who are just getting to know each other
f simply having a stray smartphone lying nearby reduces
T: a simple count of the number of men for every 100 women in a specific population.
sex ratio
how does the sex ratio influence relationships norms
high = traditional gender roles and sexually conservative low= more freedmen
what does it mean to say sex ratio is high
more men
low= more women
a baby book does what to this ratio
low
The Roaring Twenties, a footloose and playful decade? high or low sex ration
low
what we expect and what we accept in our dealings with others can spring from …
the standards of the time and place in which we live.
Our relationships are also affected by the histories and experiences we bring to them, and there is no better example of this than the global orientations toward relationships known as …
attachment styles
T: They happily bonded with others and relied on them comfortably, and the children readily developed relationships characterized by relaxed trust.
securely attached
Other children encountered different situations. For some, attentive care was unpredictable and inconsistent. Their caregivers were warm and interested on some occasions but distracted, anxious, or unavailable on others.= what attachment style
anxious-ambivalent (freak out with leaving caregiver)
needy in relationships
care was provided reluctantly by rejecting or hostile adults.= what attechment style
avoidant
Avoidant children were often suspicious of and angry at others, and they did not easily form trusting, close relationships.
how do secure children respond to strange enviro
secure children ran to their mothers, calmed down, and then set out to bravely explore the unfamiliar new setting
how do anxious children respond to strange enviro
Anxious-ambivalent children cried and clung to their mothers, ignoring the parents’ reassurances that all was well.
how long do these at styles stay with us
Cindy Hazan and Phillip Shaver (demonstrated that similar orientations toward close relationships could also be observed among adults.
how many adults had secure and insecure attachments in Cindy Hazan and Phillip Shavers study
40% insecure
Kim Bartholomew (1990) suggested that there were two different reasons why people might wish to avoid being too close to others- adding a fourth attachment style. what are the 2 reasons
In one case, people could want relationships with others but be wary of them, fearing rejection and mistrusting them. In the other case, people could be independent and self-reliant, genuinely preferring autonomy and freedom rather than close attachments to others.
what are the 4 attachment styles
secure, preoccupied, fearful, dismissing
a preoccupied style, was a new name for …
anxious ambivalence (renamed the category to reflect the fact that, because they nervously depended on others’ approval to feel good about themselves, such people worried about, and were preoccupied with, the status of their relationships.)
describe a secure attachment in adulthood
T: It is easy for me to become emotionally close to others. I am comfortable depending on others and having others depend on me. I don’t worry about being alone or having others not accept me.
describe a preoccupied attachment in adulthood
I want to be completely emotionally intimate with others, but I often find that others are reluctant to get as close as I would like. I am uncomfortable being without close relationships, but I sometimes worry that others don’t value me as much as I value them.
describe a fearful attachment in adulthood (avoidant)
I am uncomfortable getting close to others. I want emotionally close relationships, but I find it difficult to trust others completely or to depend on them. I worry that I will be hurt if I allow myself to become too close to others.
describe a dismissing attachment in adulthood (avoidant)
I am comfortable without close emotional relationships. It is very important to me to feel independent and self-sufficient, and I prefer not to depend on others or have others depend on me.
2 Dif ways you can be avoidant
Fearful people avoided intimacy with others because of their fears of rejection. Although they wanted others to like them, they worried about the risks of relying on others. In contrast, people with a dismissing style felt that intimacy with others just wasn’t worth the trouble.
It’s also now generally accepted that two broad themes underlie and distinguish these four styles of attachment what are these
people differ in their avoidance of intimacy
anxiety about abandonment
T: which affects the ease and trust with which they accept interdependent intimacy with others
avoidance of intimacy and anxiety about abandonment
T: the dread that others will find them unworthy and leave them
anxiety about abandonment.
how do the 3 insecure attachment styles differ in their anxiety about abandonment
Preoccupied people want closeness but anxiously fear rejection. Dismissing people don’t worry about rejection but don’t like closeness. And fearful people get it from both sides, being uncomfortable with intimacy and worrying it won’t last
attachment styles are discrete, pure categories that do not overlap
f
When they are simply asked to pick which one of the four paragraphs fits them best, most people in the United States—usually around …percent—describe themselves as being securely attached
60
attachment styles appear to be orientations toward relationships that are largely learned from our experiences with others.
t
the quality of parenting a baby receives can depend, in part, on the child’s own personality and behavior; in this way, people’s attachment styles are influenced by …
the traits with which they were born, and our genes shape our styles
how does a moms attitude influence attachment style of their baby
Expectant mothers who are glad to be pregnant are more likely to have secure toddlers