adoption studies Flashcards

1
Q

what is this theory

A

genetic
biological

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does this study do

A

adopted children are compared to their biological and adopted parents to see if biology or environment have more influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what was hutchings and mednicks AIM

A

investigate whether children inherit criminality from biological or adopted parents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what was hutchings and mednicks PROCEDURE

A
  • studied 14000 adopted children in denmark
  • they compared adoptees with criminal records to adoptees without criminal records
  • found high number of boys with criminal convictions had biological parents with crimes convictions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was hutchings and mednicks FINDINGS

A

-sons where more likely to have a criminal record if a birth parent (father) also had a record (20% probability rate)
- compared to only 14.7% had criminal records if their adoptive parents did

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was hutchings and mednicks CONCLUSION

A

this suggests a link between aggression and genetics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what did mednicks et FIND

A
  • no relationship between the number of criminal convictions of adoptive parents and their adoptive children
  • did find a relationship between number of criminal convictions of biological parents and their offspring
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

STRENGTH: how can twin studies be a strength for this method, link to GRAVE

A

adoption study’s overcame the problem faced by twin studies:biological twins are brought up in same household, separates nature and nurture
makes it valid: clearly see which side causes criminality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

STRENGTH: how is the research design being logical and strength

A

allows us to see the relative importance of nature v nurture without question as they are separate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

STRENGTH: how can hutchings and mednicks be a strength, link to GRAVE

A

they used a large sample over 14000 adopted children
findings from the study support genetic explanations 20% probability that if a son had a criminal record a birth parent would
generalisable:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

WEAKNESSES: how many environmental factors impact the theory, link to GRAVE

A

many children aren’t adopted immediately from birth - average adoption age is 3 years and 3 months, children may also be placed in environments similar of their birth parent - same class, ethnicity etc
issues with validity: can’t tell if it’s nature or nurture - doesn’t measure what we are trying to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

WEAKNESS: can you adopt with a criminal record

A

yes - non serious/medium offences only serious offences (murder, sexual assault etc) rule you out
you can’t therefore be certain whether it’s the genes or environment causing crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

WEAKNESS: how can hutchings and mednicks study be criticised, link to GRAVE

A

only males in denmark, can’t apply to general population
issues with generalisability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly