1.1 Design Argument Flashcards

1
Q

What kind of argument is the DA?

A

Inductive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who is the scholar for the design argument?

A

William Paley

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Name of Paley’s book?

A

Natural theology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What kind of statements does the DA use for its argument?

A

Synthetic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What kind of knowledge does the DA use?

A

A posteriori

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Weakness of inductive arguments

A

Only probabilistic/ cannot be 100% true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the three main sets of observation Paley made?

A

Complexity, order and purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Examples of complexity in the world

A

eye, laws of nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Examples of order/regularity in the world?

A

seasons, orbit of planets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Examples of purpose in the world?

A

Fish gills, lacteal system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How can examples of complexity and order highlight purpose?

A

Complexity and order of things imply that they were made of the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is natural theology?

A

God’s existence can be inferred by using reasn, science, history and observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the watch analogy

A

Watch shows that it is too complex and purposeful to have come about by chance therefore must have been designed by a watchmaker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the 6 steps of Paley’s analogy?

A
  1. a watch has complex parts which fit together for a purpose
  2. watch must have been designed by a watchmaker
  3. The universe has parts that function together for a purpose
  4. The univsere must have been designed by a watchmaker
  5. The universe is more complex than a watch so the designer must be greater
  6. The universe designer is god
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain Paley’s quote: “Every indication of design which existed in the watch exists in the works of nature with the nature being greater and more”

A

All evidence of design in a watch is also found in nature but is more complex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain Paley’s quote [nature’s design is greater] “in a degree which exists beyond all computation”

A

Evidence of design in nature is beyond comprehension/understanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Who is on the main critics of the DA?

A

David Hume

18
Q

Name of Hume’s book?

A

Dialogues concerning natural religion

19
Q

What 2 errors do you need to avoid when using Hume to criticise DA?

A
  1. Avoiding thinking Hume was commenting on Paley’s design argument
  2. Avoid simply listing the arguments - you need to explain!
20
Q

What are 2 categories of Hume’s criticisms?

A
  1. Argument to design
  2. Argument from design
21
Q

Explain Hume’s criticism of ‘lesser beings’

A

God of classical theism is too big an explanation. The universe could have been designed by lesser beings

22
Q

What is Hume’s main quote?

A

“A wise man propotions his evidence to the evidence”

23
Q

Explain Hume’s criticism of many Gods

A

The universe could have been designed by many junior gods

24
Q

Explain Hume’s criticism of an imperfect designer

A

The universe contains too much evil in the world to have been designed by the God of classical theism

25
Q

Explain Hume’s vegetable analogy

A

We should compare the universe to a vegetable as they grow of their own accord

26
Q

Explain Hume’s criticism of DA as anthropomorphic

A

We have no idea of universe making so we limit God by comparing God to a human designer

27
Q

Explain the Epicurean hypothesis

A

The universe is just the changing arrangements of atoms and given infinite time an ordered universe was inevitable

28
Q

How can evolution criticise the DA?

A

Evolution explains evidence of design

29
Q

What did Dawkins argue about Paley’s DA

A

That Paley was ‘gloriously wrong’

30
Q

Swinburne’s quote to support the DA?

A

“Simplicity is always evidence of the truth”

31
Q

How can we criticise the problem of evil?

A
  1. Free will defence
  2. Process theodicy
  3. Hick’s soul making theodicy
32
Q

What is the anthropic prinicple?

A

Universe has been fine tuned to ensure the existence of intelligent life

33
Q

Paley’s argument does provide proof (empirical evidence)

A

1) Paley provides sufficient empirical evidence

34
Q

Paley’s argument does provide proof (inductive argument)

A

2) Paley provides an inductive argument which is probably true

35
Q

Paley’s argument does provide proof (best explanation)

A

God is the best explanation for the evidence of design

36
Q

Paley’s argument does provide not proof (poor evidence)

A

Evidence provided by Paley can be proven through evolution

37
Q

Paley’s argument does provide not proof (religious experiences)

A

Theists believe proof can only come through religious experiences

38
Q

Paley’s argument does not provide proof (not a deductive argument)

A

Only deductive arguments provide 100% proof, inductive arguments are only probable

39
Q

Play’s argument does have value for faith (supports faith)

A

DA supports faith in God through empirical evidence and reasoning

40
Q

Paley’s argument does have value for faith (against atheism)

A

Atheists arguments are just as hypothetical therefore DA provides a reasonable argument

41
Q

Paley’s argument does not have value for religious faith (sola fide)

A

Faith in god is based on faith alone (sola fide), empirical evidence is not needed