week 1 Flashcards

1
Q

4 reasons relationships are a human need

A

1- ppl naturally pursure relations (easy to form and hard to break)

2- w/o close connections, we suffer

3- we only need to many relationships (satiation)

4- the need to belong is innate and universal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

the need to belong

A
  • why relationships are adaptove
  • the deep roots of the desire for intimate connections
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the donner party

A

rich ppl who decided they wanted to treck across the USA - they were unprepared and things kept going wrong

got stuck in the middle of no where and only about half of them survived
- ppl w bigger family size survived more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

humans are weak so they use what

A

connections instead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

in the past we needed others to survive; now what does it mean in present day

A

that its still in our DNA and still feels like life or death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

social support in the past

A

sharing resources (not sharing w outgroup)

divvying tasks

providig assistance (probably to the in group not outgroup)

sense of belonging - social benefits like talkng to others - donner partyy - parents surviving for theor children

think survivor and the first thing they do is make alliances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

relationships are adaptive

A

humans have a fundamental need to form and maintain a minimum quantity of lasting, positive, and significant interpersonal relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

need to belong proposal

A

ppl hv a fundamental need for social connection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

1.1) social bonds are easy to form

A

A)Minimal Group Situations: people are willing to form meaningful groups based on meaningless distinctions

B) Friendships based on proximity

C) Form friendships with people we share unpleasant experiences with - military, stats class

D) Pets can help us meet our social needs
McConnell et al., 2011
- Pet owners were found to be less
lonely, less depressed, happier with
their lives
-Thinking about one’s pet warded off
feelings of rejection in an experiment

*when lonely we are more likely to anthropomorphize pets (ascribe human traits like sympathy)

E) We form parasocial relationships
One-sided relationships with
personalities from the media
(celebrities, news anchors, characters,
etc.) Favorite television characters are seen as real people (Gardner & Knowles,
2007) Tuning into favourite TV shows
makes people feel less lonely, and
buffers against effects of rejection
(Derrick et al., 2007)

F) In a pinch, even inanimate objects will do. Social isolation and loneliness lead to increased materialism over time (Rik, 2013) We anthropomorphize our possessions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

1.2) social bonds are difficult to break

A

A) People are reluctant to admit that even relatively meaningless relationships will end
- we dont like to admit we are loosing relations

B) Many rituals promote the maintenance of relatively weak social bonds
- sending happy bday, liking Ig post, holiday cards

C) Many experience reluctance, difficulty ending
toxic/abusive relationships (e.g., Choice & Lamke,
1999)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

2) w/o close connections we suffer

A

A) Lack of social connection is a strong
predictor of mortality – rivals predictors like
smoking (House, Landis, & Umberson,
1988)

B) Loneliness has huge physiological and
psychological consequences (review:
Hawkley & Cacioppo, 2010)
-Poorer self-regulation; fewer health-
promoting behaviours
-Reduced sleep quality
-Poorer physiological functioning (increased
blood pressure, cortisol)
-Lower immune system functioning
-Associated with cognitive impairment,

C) Susceptibility to illness (Cohen et al.,
1997)
-Pre-study questionnaire: social network
diversity
-Different types of close relationships (friends,
siblings, romantic partner, etc.)
-Quarantined for 5 days, given nasal drops of
common-cold virus
-Those with more diverse networks
were less likely to develop the
cold
than those with less diverse networks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

marriage as a buffer

A

Happily married couples are healthier, psychologically
and physically, then other groups
- True across cultures (Diener et al., 2000)
-Marriage is even better than cohabiting for psychological
health (Kim & McKendry, 2002)
- Health benefits of relationships/marriage extend to
same-sex couples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

3)need to belong can be satiated

A

u only like 6 close friends to fulfill

A) As an intimate relationship
develops, people spend less time
with other people such as friends
(Johnson & Hutson, 1983)

B) Attachment to ex-partners and
current partners are hydraulic
(Spielmann et al., 2013)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

4) the need to belong is universal

A

Principles we’ve been discussing do not seem to be
culture-specific- people everywhere need close
relationships

A) Relationships everywhere are easy to form
- people naturally form small groups across cultures (Coon,
1946)

B) Relationships everywhere are difficult to break
- distress on ending relationships is universal (Hazan & Shaver,
1994)
-This universality suggests that belonging is a basic human
function; basic human need

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

where do research q come from

A

a)Personal experience
b) Social problems
c) Previous research
d) Theories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what kind of measue for resrach

A

Measurement challenges in relationship science
š Often studying abstract constructs
š Need to operationalize constructs in order to measure them

self report, observational, psysiological

17
Q

self report measures

A

Fixed or open-ended
Pros
š Allow us to “get inside people’s heads”
š Inexpensive and easy to obtain
Cons
š Difficulties in recall
š Social desirability

18
Q

social desireability

A

q like cheating would be bad

19
Q

observational measures

A

Gather data about relationship events
without having to ask people who are
experiencing those events directly
š Home-based observation
š In-lab observation
š Anywhere!

20
Q

observational; airport study

A

Romantic couples unobtrusively observed as they said
goodbye

Avoidant partners sought less physical contact, embraced and held hands less

Anxious partners expressed more fear and sadness

21
Q

psychological measures

A

Can give us insight into the body’s involuntary
reactions and ultimately how people feel and
react in romantic relationships
Heart rate, muscle tension, brain activity

22
Q

who do we study

A

convience sample, representative sample

23
Q

convience sample

A

Examples include:
š Undergraduate students
š Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (crowd sourcing)
š People recruited from Kijiji, Craigslist, etc.
Pro: Are easier to get
Con: May not be representative of
people in broader population

24
Q

representative

A

Examples include:
š General Social Survey
š Statistics Canada data
š Community samples recruited strategically
VERY difficult to get
Relationships researchers generally
use a combination of convenience
and more (though not totally)
representative samples

25
Q

issues of generalizability

A

Most studies have been conducted on people who are WEIRD
š Western
š Educated
š Industrialized
š Rich
š Democratic
75% of longitudinal research on marriage have involved primarily White, Protestant, and
middle-class participants (Karney & Bradbury, 1995)
An issue in social psychology more broadly

26
Q

volunterr bias in research

A

People who agree to participate in research may differ from those who refuse
One study found volunteers (compared to people who refused) were:
o Better educated
o Employed in higher-status jobs
o More likely to have lived together
o When two members of couple required to participate, more satisfied than if just one
member required

27
Q

controlling variables

A

Controlling” for alternative explanations
š You measure an alternative variable that might explain your effect, and you include it in your
analyses
š If your effect is just a proxy for something the control variable is doing, your effect will be wiped
out
E.g., When children eat more ice cream, they’re more likely to drown!
š Have you tried controlling for whether it’s summertime?
š Oh hey, the effect is gone. Nuts.

28
Q

experiment pro and con

A

Pros
šShowing cause and effect relationship
šIsolating the variables of interest
Cons
šLack of external validity: real-world significance?
šLimitations in terms of the types of processes we can study

29
Q

An important note on dyadic methods

A

In relationship science, we are often interested in
studying BOTH PARTNERS in a relationship
Actor partner interdependence model (APIM)

30
Q
A