conflict adn communication Flashcards
How We
Communicate
voice support vs. Text support
(Seltzer, 2012)
Daughters who heard
mom’s voice released
oxytocin
Reasons for couples’
communication (Coyne et al.
2011)
But…put phone away when having conversations (Przybylski
& Weinstein, 2013)
IV: phone present/absent
Meaningful/casual convo
DV: closeness, trust empath
finding - presence of phone = lower quality convo and less close adn less empathy and less trust
why phone bad
phons cues us to think of all of our other close relationships
couples who text abt serious stuff
lower relationship quality
frequent and long phone calls
low uncertainty
more love
more commitment
lower avoidance
*not relayed to texting
sexting
attachment anxiety
sext frequently
felt obligated to do so
just a new way for anxious ppl to be anxious ppl
language style matching
Pronouns, articles &
conjunctions (the words that usually fade into backgounf like “the”)
LSM in speed-dating
interactions => mutual
interest
LSM in dating couples’ texts
=> relationship longevity
shorthand being picked up by s/o
Nonverbals communcations
Nonverbal channels
o Kinesics (body movements)
o Vocalics/paralanguage (non-word vocal cues)
o Physical appearance
o Haptics (touch)
o Proxemics (distance)
o Chronemics (time)
o Artefacts (objects & environmental features)
Kinesics
Mimicry increases liking
when confederates mimincs participants behv then partiicpant likes them more
when partiicpant is tolf tontry and get the condeberate to like them, the partiicpant will ,i,ic behv
called behviorubal mimicry aka the chameleoeon effev
ppl said that when ppl mmic eachother it looks like a smoother interaction
Haptics
Touch can communicate distinct
emotions (Hertenstein et al., 2006)
Anger, fear, disgust, love, sympath
cannot communciate self focused langauge like envy and pride adn embarrassment
Proxemics
fearful of intimacy- less likely to lean forward (Guerrero, 1996)
Unrewarding person comes close, like them less (Burgoon et al., 1988
Physical appearance
When trying to attract mates (women):
Put their best face forward (make-up)
Dress to impress
When comfortable in relationship:
Groom less
Gain weight– mating market model (Meltzer et al., 2013)
does the nonverbal cues differentiate liking from frienfship
no
Signaling intimacy
Involvement (engaged & active) & positive affect
Proxemics
less distance, more forward lean, body
orientation, matching horizontal plane
Haptics
esp. vulnerable areas such as the face or neck
Kinesics
synchronized body movements, gestures, &
facial expressions
eye contact
Vocalics
matching vocal cues
more variation in pitch
Chronemics
time spent together
detecting communicatiin
Men who did well were in more
satisfied relationships.
Follow-up study to address
direction problem (Noller,
1981)
Detecting Communication: Gender Difference?
Empathic accuracy= The ability to
accurately infer the content of another
person’s thoughts and feeling (Ickes, 1993)
women are better at readings other’s feelings but onlt when cued into ehsg the task is assessing
Gender differences due to motivation, not
ability
Attachment and Empathic Accuracy
Secure:
Accurate when accuracy is beneficial (e.g. Simpson et al.,
2011)
High Anxiety:
Accurate when accuracy is NOT beneficial (Simpson, et
al., 1999)
High Avoidance:
NOT accurate when accuracy is beneficial (Maxwell et
al., in prep)
What are we fighting about?
Top 6 conflict topics:
Children
Chores
Communication
Leisure Time
Money
Work
“#1 thing couples fight about: Nothing!”
-John Gottman
