Unit 10 : Social Psychology Modules 74-80 Flashcards
Social psychology
Study of how people are influenced and relate to one another, less focus on self, and behavior is shaped by situations
Attribution theory
Explain someone’s behavior by crediting the situation or the persons despositions
Fundamental attribution error
Analyzing other and underestimating the impact of the situation and overestimating the impact if personal disposition
->impact our attitudes and how we treat them
Dispositional attribution
Explains behavior as a result of their personality/personal disposition
Situational attribution
Behavior influenced by situations,
-> with our selves we see the situation of behavior, but not with others
Self serving bias
Tend to see ourselves favorably
Peripheral route
Influenced by incidental, outside factors; celebrity endorsement (fast results)
Central route
Persuade using thoughts, evidence, arguments, challenge human thinking (more durable)
Foot-in-the-door
Tendency for people to agree to bigger requests after first agreeing to smaller requests
Door-in-the-face
Start off with mega risk request to soften the request that you initially want to ask.
Role playing
Philip Zimbardos and Stanford Prison Experiment
- > participants assigned to roles. : prisoner or guard
- > the more they act like the role, the more they adopted the attitudes of the role
Role
Set of norms and expectations about a position
Cognitive dissonance
Leon Fetinger
- > sometimes actions and attitudes do not match which causes discomfort
- > in order to reduce discomfort, change attitudes / our actions
Ex : best friend-views them as “good” —> “good” person does something you view as morally wrong
-> change attitude towards the person or change moral views
Chameleon effect
Humans unconsciously imitate others expressions, posture, and voice tone
Conformity study
Solomon Asch
Experiment with lines
Going against a group/social norm-discomfort-feel pressure to conform
More likely to conform when a group is in unison Feel insecure Admire group Group is at least 3 people or more Know we are being observed No prior commitment to an answer
Normative social influence
Conform to gain approval or avoid rejection/disapproval
Informative social influence
Conform due to willingness to accept another’s truth
Obedience Study
Stanley Milgram
- > inspired by WW2 and Nazi and how they were obedient even during Holocaust
- > experiment included teachers (shockers) and students (shocked) if wrong answers were given the student would get a shock and the voltage would increase
Obedience is more likely when
- > person giving orders is an authority figure
- > supported by prestigious institutions
- > victim is depersonalized / at a distance
- > no role models for defiance
Social facilitation
Improved performance on a simple / well-learned tasks in the presence of others, but more difficult tasks seem impossible (arouses)
Social loafing
People put in less effort when putting efforts together than when individually responsible (diminishes)
Deindividualism
Loss of self-awareness and self restraint occurring in. Group situations that foster arousal and anonymity
Group polarization
Arguments become more intense during discussion throughout the group
Groupthink
desire for harmony in a decision making group overrides a realistic appraisal of alternative thinking
Social control
Power of the situation
Personal control
Control of the individual
Minority influence
Power of one or two individuals that can sway majorities if they are firm