Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

WOP & SP DTI > SP lecture 5&6 > Flashcards

SP lecture 5&6 Flashcards

1
Q

ABC of attitudes-> tripartite model

A
  • affective = feelings about object
  • behaviour = actions towards object
  • cognitive = knowledge about object
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how do we evaluate attributions

A
  • consistency
  • primacy of negative info
  • accessibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

attitude objects

A

people, social groups, objects, ourself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

2 reasons why we form attitudes

A
  • mastery: knowledge simplication (bv Iphone = goed), instrumental value
  • connectedness: social identity, impression management
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

explicit attitude measurment (voorbeeld en - punten)

A
  • self report
  • social desirability, no introspection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

implicit associations test meet…

A

conceptually: mental distance between target and attitude. but it actually measures reaction time.

congruent = faster reaction time than incongruent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

implicit associations test - punten

A
  • noisy
  • need to find the right stimuli
  • need to contrast categories
  • meet niet goed eigenlijk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

facial electromyography

A

meet uncontrollable facial movements

maar:
-noisy
-cultural differences in muscle movement
-niet precise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

fMRI op amygdala: meten fear (-punten)

A
  • niet precies
  • we do not know the brain that well
  • expensive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

automatic vs controlled: which one is hot and cold>

A

automatic = hot
controlled = cold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

associative, heuristics and analytical: waar horen ze bij?

A

associative = mere exposure
heuristics = superficial
analytical = systematic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

subliminal priming experiment chinese signs:

A

like it better when a smiling woman occured, then butter, then angry woman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

andere naam voor heuristics

A

cognitive shortcuts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

attitude change or formation is influenced by

A

source - who
medium - how
message - what

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

the source: biases

A
  • expertise bias
  • attractiveness bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

the message: biases

A
  • meer info is meer geloven
  • availability heuristics
  • order effects:
    primacy effect vs recency effect
  • fear arousing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

when does fear arousing work

A
  • moderate levels of fear
  • compared with good solution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

systematic information processing theory

A

attention - understanding - elaboration (sterker maken!) - acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

when can we elaborate on attitudes?

A

If you are motivated
* Relevance of topic
* Mood
* Personality
* Need for cognition

geen motivatie als:
* you dont believe there is an issue
* you are not close to the topic
* happy people: less motivated

If you are capable
* Time pressure
* Distraction
* Lower resources in general

geen capable als:
* moeheid (representativeness heuristic: jess is a girl and jess likes taylor swift)
* scarcity mindset (luisteren naar sad music bij uncertain prime: minder boeken kopen, happy music juist meer. -> uncertain prime leidt dus tot de hele tijd twijfelen en attitude veranderen. bij certain prime bleef het hetzelfde)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

we dont change attitudes when we…

A

▪ Ignore
▪ Reinterpret
▪ Resist
Especially LESS likely to change when we …
▪ Know a persuasion attempt is happening
▪ Process systematically
▫ Motivation
▫ Capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

wanneer resistant to attitude change

A

van 18-25 minst resistent, na 25 resistant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

intelligence and attitude change

A

low iq = suggestible
high iq = less suggestible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Greenwald, Poehlman, Uhlmann, and Banaji (2009; GPUB hereafter) reported an average predictive
validity correlation of r .236 for Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures involving Black–White
racial attitudes and stereotypes. Oswald, Mitchell, Blanton, Jaccard, and Tetlock (2013; OMBJT)
reported a lower aggregate figure for correlations involving IAT measures (r .148). The difference
between the estimates of the 2 reviews was due mostly to their use of different policies for including
effect sizes. GPUB limited their study to findings that assessed theoretically expected attitude– behavior
and stereotype–judgment correlations along with others that the authors expected to show positive
correlations. OMBJT included a substantial minority of correlations for which there was no theoretical
expectation of a predictive relationship. Regardless of inclusion policy, both meta-analyses estimated
aggregate correlational effect sizes that were large enough to explain discriminatory impacts that are
societally significant either because they can affect many people simultaneously or because they can
repeatedly affect single persons.

A

oke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

self-perception theory

A

people observe themselves to know what their attitudes are

-> especially for attitude formation!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
self-perception and attitude 2 voorbeelden
- body movement (lichaam laat zien wat we ergens van vinden) - foot in the door
26
facial feedback hypothesis
facial expressions geven feedback -> hierdoor worden emoties nog sterker
27
voorbeeld experiment facial feedback hypothesis
pen in mond tussen tanden -> cartoon leuker vinden dan pen met mond er rondom heen
28
maar facial feedback hypothesis..
niet door science gesupport
29
when does foot in the door work
- first request meaningful en wel beetje effort - first request voluntary - limited cognitive processing = superficial!! - personal need for consistency
30
self-perception influences attitudes when...
internal cues are ambiguous/weak/uninterpretable weak attitudes
31
applications of self-perception on marketing
- free samples - writing slogan contest -> want: ik gebruik het, dus dan vind ik het leuk
32
change attitude after cognitive arousal when:
*Inconsistency is noticed *Personal responsibility is high *Unpleasant feeling(arousal) is present *Arousal is attributed to inconsistency *No alternative reduction strategy is presented
33
lapiere research attitude and behaviour
LaPiere (1934), travelled with a Chinese couple, They visited 67 hotels and 184 cafés and restaurants. *Afterwards LaPiere sent letters to these establishments to ask them whether they accepted Chinese as customers. all restaurants served them (behaviour) but almost all said in the mail they would not (attitude)
34
criticism la piere
*Were those receiving guests the same people as those answering the letters? *Time between attitudes and behaviour. *Attitude measure about Chinese people, behavioural measure about Caucasian man with two Chinese people. *“non-stereotypical”
35
accessible attitudes reduce alertness
oke
36
how do attitudes influence behaviour
via systematic processing! - cost-benefit trade off - intentions
37
when do attitudes influence behaviour
- self-awareness - milgrim paradigm (schokken geven)
38
carter mirror experiment
Subjects, who on questionnaires had indicated that they opposed or condoned the use of punishment, were given the opportunity to shock a male confederate in two (bogus) learning experiments. Each subject was instructed to use his own attitude in choosing shocks to punish incorrect responses. Self-awareness was increased among half the subjects by the presence of a mirror. In each experiment a Punitiveness by self-awareness interaction resulted: High Punitive-Mirror subjects shocked higher than Low Punitive-Mirror subjects, but their respective No Mirror controls did not differ from each other. dus mensen met mirror die een positieve attitude richting punishment hebben gaven hogere shocken dan mensen die negatieve attitude richting punishment hadden. mensen zonder spiegel: geen verschil
39
theory of planned behaviour
attitude + subjective norm + perceived behavioural control -> intention -> behaviour
40
birth control experiment
birth control: minder mensen een attitude voor dan 'the pill for the next 2 years' -> dus specificity matters
41
hoezo twee verschillende resultaten van meta analyses over IAT scores:
*Different studies and effects input Greenwald et al., only included were they ”expected effects” *Different statistical decisions Splitting samples *Missing moderators Correspondence Social sensitivity
42
media 2 factoren
- medium (how the message is conveyed) - message (content)
43
but ... the medium is the message!
want medium heeft evenveel invloed op message als de content. tv = hot medium, heeft het hele plaatje radio = cold, zelf dingen bij inbeelden
44
wat zei mcluhan
media is not a communication channel, but an extension of the body -> net als streetlight, we kunnen nu veel meer met ons lichaam dan vroeger
45
invloed van google op knowledge
misattribution of knowledge and overconfidence
46
social perception 2 factoren verschillend
- assimilation: judgement of the behaviour = standard - contrast: judgement of the behaviour = different
47
self-discrepancy theory
difference between actual self and ideal & ought self
48
hoe is self-regulation gerelateerd aan de self-discrepancy theory
door discrepancy tussen ideal and ought -> self regulation increases
49
Effect of female-objectivating videos on ideal body weight and actual-ideal discrepancy
occured only in women who score low on self-esteem
50
how do we go against these self-discrepancy effects
- more awareness (evolution video) - maar geen warnings, deze helpen juist tegen
51
agenda setting effect
hoe meer exposure in media, hoe relevanter je het vind
52
the news filter
if it bleeds it leads
53
framing
fetus vs baby, associations met negatieve dingen
54
positief effect van media =
persuasion knowledge (we weten dat veel nep is)
55
meer entrophy leidt niet tot ..
meer usage, want limited capacity
56
propoganda doel
verwarring creeren, what is the truth?
57
fake news heuristics
- familiarity - source - emotion
58
active roles in media
- denier - conspiracy theorist - alarmist - clickbait monger
59
mcguires innoculation theory
exposure to a weakened version of persuasion leads to resistance for persuasion in the future
60
why does innoculation work
- threat (alarmbellen gaan af) - refutational preemption (provide arguments to help with refutation) -> may lead to umbrella effect, for both refutation-same and refutation-different messages
61
gamified exposure to persuasion
is minder geloven
62
filter bubbles
alleen info te zien krijgen die consistent is met pre-existing attitudees - individual (confirmation bias: cognitive and motivational principles) -social (groep waar je in zit) -technological (algorithms)
63
degree of transportation leads to
less counter arguments = suspension of belief

WOP & SP DTI (17 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions