SOCIAL social identity theory Flashcards
explain the term social identity
refers to an individual’s self-concept and comes from how people see themselves in relation to members of their social group
what is self-concept
having a sense of who we are and consists of many social identities
what is in-group favouritism
preference for people who identify to your in-group - this results in giving advantage to in-group members
who created the theory and when
Tajfel and Turner 1979
explain the theory
- we have a strong desire to belong and we derive from self-esteem by acceptance from others
- social behaviour is driven by motivation to maintain a position as a valued member of the group
- claims that prejudice is a natural outcome to social grouping
- competition is not necessary
what are the 3 processes
social categorisation, social identification, social comparison
explain the process of social categorisation
- we see ourselves as belonging to a group, and see other groups as the out-groups
- this process involves stereotyping
explain the process of social identification
- the process of taking on aspects of our in-group identity as our own
- e.g. group norms, clothing
- shared norms lead to a strong group identity
explain the process of social comparison
- when people see their in-group as better than the out-groups
- develop in-group favouritism which boosts our self-esteem
- prejudice and discrimination may arise
what factors influence in-group favouritism
- the extent to which the individuals identify with the in-group
- the extent to which there are grounds for making comparisons with the out-group
positives of the theory
- supporting evidence from Tajfel (1970) - boys who behaved similarly (in-group) and not (out-group) - social categorisation triggers in-group favouritism
- useful application of radicalisation - moulded into extremes of a group - help people who are vulnerable to radicalisation
- useful application - Gaertner’s common in-group identity model - create new groups to include everyone - reduce inter-racial tension
negatives of the study
- refuting evidence by Sherif (1954) - two groups became aggressive when manipulated to compete for zero-sum resources - competition must be introduced
- ignores idea that personality may play a role in development - Adorno = authoritarian personality - overlooks individual differences as personality - lowers credibility
- isolates membership of groups - ignores upbringing/ history between groups - reductionist