SOCIAL Milgram's studies Flashcards
define obedience
how much an individual follows orders from higher authority figures
when was Milgram’s classic study
1963
what was the aim of Milgram’s
to investigate levels of obedience when ordered by higher authority to electrocute someone
what was the sample of Milgram’s
- 40 males - 20-50 years old
- took place at Yale University
- volunteer sample - adverts in newspaper and direct mail
what was the procedure of Milgram’s
- introduced to Mr Wallace, biased names in a hat to see who would play who - Mr W always the learner
- Mr W strapped in to chair in front of participant
- told administer a memory test , if answers are wrong, electrocute Mr W
- intervals of 15 v up to 450 v (enough to kill)
- signs of moral strain was shown
what were the results of Milgram’s
65% went to 450 v
all showed signs of moral strain
what was the conclusion of Milgram’s
the situation is the main factor of obedience (Yale = very prestigious)
Positive evaluation points of Milgram’s
- volunteer sample = quick and easy
- standardised procedure (all had the names out the hat) = reliable
- Benefits to society = can relate to German soldiers - why did they listen to the higher authority?
negative evaluation points of Milgram’s
- ethnocentric/ androcentric = not representative
- lab experiment = not ecologically valid
- ETHICS (deception = thought it was a memory test) (protection from harm = moral strain- seizures)
what was Milgram’s experiment 7 and the aim
telephone instructions - to see if distance effected levels of obedience
how many participants went up to 450 volts in experiment 7
22.5%
explain Milgram’s experiment 10 and describe the aim
rundown office block - downtown shopping centre, Connecticut
- to see if the situation effected obedience
how many participants went to 450 v n experiment 10
47.5%
explain Milgram’s experiment 13
Ordinary man
- experimenter went out at the beginning of the experiment and was replaced by an ordinary man
what happened in Milgram’s 13a and what was the participant’s response
ordinary man offered to take over for the participant
- all rejected the offer