BIOLOGICAL Brendgen Et Al Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

when did the study take place

A

2005

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

why are twin studies used

A

establish the extent to which behaviours are the result of nature and nurture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the aim of the study

A

to study the contribution of genes and environment to social and physical aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the definition of social aggression

A

damaging someone’s relationships or social status

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was the sample used

A
  • secondary data from the longitudinal twin study from Canada
  • 234 pairs of 6 year old twins
  • 175 pairs from different classes
  • mixture of MZ and DZ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how was data collected

A
  • peer ratings from sociometric data for levels of aggression
  • photos and behavioural descriptors used
  • responses were given on a 3-point scale
  • all responses added to get a total social and physical aggression score
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

who approved the research questions

A

institutional review board

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how was the data analysed

A

MZ ratings were compared with the same sex DZ ratings (a control)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what were the results

A
  • MZ correlations twice as high as DZ for physical aggression - genetics
  • MZ and DZ correlations for social aggression were similar - environmental
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what was the conclusion

A
  • social aggression due to environmental factors
  • physical aggression due to genetic factors
  • child who shows physical aggression when young = more likely to show social aggression as they mature
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

positives of Brendgen

A
  • ethical - did not directly manipulate the children (secondary data) - principle of responsibility
  • inter-rater reliability - both teachers and peers had high level of agreement - consistency
  • same sex DZ twins macthed with MZ twins - similar as possible - internal validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

negatives of Brendgen

A
  • secondary data - lowers validity - no way of checking data - own research may be flawed
  • ratings of aggression based on memory recalls - may not match reality - not a valid way of measuring
  • only data from 6 year old twins from Canada - cannot generalise - aggression influenced by cultural norms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly