social influence - milgram and obedience to authority Flashcards
Define obedience to authority
- where somebody acts in response to a direct order
- from figure with perceived authority
Milgram’s study AO1
Aim
- to investigate if individuals would obey authority figure
- even if it led to negative consequences
Milgram’s study AO1
Method
Laboratory experiment at Yale University
Milgram’s study AO1
Sample
40 American males aged 20-50
Milgram’s study AO1
Procedure
- experimenter placed advert in newspaper seeking volunteers for ‘memory experiment’
- ppts were paid $4.50
- ppt introduced to another ppt (confederate)
- ppt = teacher
- confederate = student
- teachers role = take part in learning task
- if question answered wrong then electric shocks delivered to learner (in another room)
- volts 15V - 450V increments of 15V
- if ppt refused, experimenter prompted
- e.g. “please continue”
- “it is absolutely essential you continue”
Milgram’s study AO1
Findings
- all ppts went to 300V
- 12.5% stopped at 300V
- 65% went to 450V
- showing high obedience levels
Milgram’s study AO1
Conclusion
- ordinary people obedient to authority figures
- even when asked to behave in inhumane way
- not necessarily evil people who commit evil crimes
- ordinary people just obeying orders
Milgram’s study AO3
weakness - demand characteristics
P - prone to demand characteristics
- lab experiment
- ppts knew they were taking part in experiment
E - may have changed their natural behaviour
- they believed this is what was required of them by researcher
- instead of actually obeying authority figure
E - ppts were paid
- further influencing this
L - reduces internal validity
- milgram not measuring what he intended to measure
Milgram’s study AO3
research to support - Hofling
P - research to support
- comes from Hofling
E - study with nurses on hospital ward
- asked unknown doctor to tell them to give dangerous dose of drug to patients
- via telephone
E - 21/22 nurses agreed
- knowing not to take telephone orders
- stopped before they actually gave it
L - support obedience to authority (doctor)
- good external validity
- can be generalised to other settings
Milgram’s study AO3
weakness - gender bias
DISCUSSION POINT
P - gender bias
- male only sample
E - difficult to generalise to females
- females may be more submissive due to gender roles
E - Sheridan and kings study further supports this
- ppts ordered to give real electric shocks to puppy
- 100% females obeyed
- 54% males obeyed
L - weakens external validity
DISCUSSION
- could argue milgram was trying to explain behaviour in German nazi soldiers
- mostly male
- so male only sample used
Milgram’s study AO3
weakness - ethical issues
DISCUSSION
P - major ethical issues
E - lack of informed consent
- deception
- lack of right to withdraw
E - ppts believed the were taking part on ‘memory’ study
- ppts believed shocks were real
- when ppt refused they were prompted by experimenter to continue
L - limits milligrams research into obedience
DISCUSSION
- ppts said they were happy to take part as they learned alot about themselves
- lack of informed consent and deception necessary to avoid demand characteristics
- which may have helped/hindered research
4 AO3 points
- demand characteristics
- research to support by hofling
- gender bias
- ethical issues