attachment - bowlbys monotropic theory Flashcards
adaptive - AO1
- bowlby suggets attachment is innate
- inherited as survival advantages so it is ‘adaptive’
- infants and parents both programmed to attach
social releasers - AO1
- infants have ‘social releasers’ e.g. crying/smiling/looking ‘cute’
- triggers response by caregiver
- ensures interaction takes place
monotropy - AO1
- bowlby places great emphasis on infants attaching to one attachment figure
- most cases mother, but not biological mother
- most important in childs development
- law of continuity = best quality of attachment when child receives consistent and predictable care
- law of accumulated separation = poor quality of attachment when substantial periods of separation from monotropy
internal working model - AO1
- IWM = ‘mental representation’ of what relationship is like with primary caregiver
- acts as a model/template for what future relationships are like
- child uses attachment relationship with caregiver as expectation of future relationships
- powerful impact on future relationships with peers/romantic relationships/own children they MIRROR childhood attachments
- passed on through generations
- people base own parenting on how they were parented
research to support - AO3
Lorenz
COUNTER ARGUEMENT
P - RTS
- comes from Lorenz
E - lorenz found goslings have critical period of 12-17 hours after hatching where they must imprint
- or may not attach at all
E - supports bowlbys idea of critical period
- first 2.5 years of life
- or infant may not attach at all
L - strengthens bowlbys idea of critical period
COUNTER ARGUEMENT
- research conducted on goslings
- human behaviour = more complex
- may not be representative of human attachment behaviour
Research to contradict - AO3
Shaffer and emerson
DISCUSSION
P - RTC
- schaffer and Emerson
E - schaffer and Emerson found multiple attachments
- beneficial for infants social, emotional and cognitive development
E - contradicts monotropic theory
- idea that there infants attach to one attachment figure
L - limiting monotropic theory
DISCUSSION
- schaffer and Emerson suggested specific attachment forms before multiple attachments
- in 65% cases with mother
- somewhat supports idea of monotropy
Weakness - AO3
alternative explanation
P - alternative explanation
- learning theory
E - suggets attachment due to stimuli, response, associations
E - not attachment being innate
- and triggering caring response in caregivers
L - weakens bowlbys explanation
- not the only explanation
critical period - AO1
- biological period
- if attachment does not take place in first 2.5 years of life
- may not take place at all