attachment - effects of institutionalisation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

define institutionalisation

A
  • children spending a long time away from family home within an institution e.g. orphanage (1 MARK)
  • results in loss of personal identity and children adopting rules and norms of institution (2 MARRKS)
  • impairs cognitive functioning (3 MARKS)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 effects of institutionalisation

A
  • reactive attachment disorder
  • disinhibited attachment
  • cognitive impairment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

reactive attachment disorder - AO1
2 MARKS

A
  • caused by lack of sensitive responsiveness during early childhood
  • results in child growing up unable to love/trust others
    (1 MARK)
  • become isolated, very selfish
  • unable to understand others
  • sociopathic without conscience
  • lacks remorse
    (2 MARKS)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

disinhibited attachment - AO1
2 MARKS

A
  • when children indiscriminately select attachment figures
  • behave in overly familiar fashion to complete strangers e.g. overly affectionate
    (1 MARK)
  • caused by institutionalised care
  • children adapt to multiple caregivers in critical period
  • can display other behavioural disorders e.g. attention seeking (Zeenah et al)
    (2 MARKS)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

cognitive impairment - AO1

A
  • cognitive impairment = intellectual delay
    (1 MARK)
  • low IQ and concentration problems (Rutter et al)
  • difficulty learning new concepts and behaviours
    (2 MARKS)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

rutter et al - AO1
aim

A

to investigate if loving and nurturing care could overturn effects of institutionalisation children suffered in Romanian orphanages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

rutter et al - AO1
sample

A

111 romanian orphans adopted into British families

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

rutter et al - AO1
procedure

A
  • longitudinal study started in 1998
  • assessed physical, emotional and cognitive development in children at ages 4,6,11,15
  • age of adoption = naturally occurring IV
  • cognitive and emotional development = DV
  • rutter studied 3 groups
    1) adopted before 6 months
    2) adopted between 6 months - 2 years
    3) adopted after 2+ years (after critical period)
  • compared to control group of 52 British adopted children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

rutter et al - AO1
findings

A
  • at initial assessment 50% of Romanian children had cognitive impairment and severely undernourished
  • by 4 years lots of good recoveries
  • late adoptees = higher level of disinhibited attachment
  • early adoptees (before 6 months) seen to be doing as well as control group
  • by 11 years late adoptees = low IQ
  • adopted before 6 months = normal IQ
  • shows signs of cognitive impairment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

rutter et al - AO1
conclusion

A
  • effects of institutionalisation can be overturned by sensitive, nurturing care
  • more so if adoption was earlier
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

zeanah et al - AO1
procedure

A
  • compared 95 romanian orphans aged 12-31 months who spent 90% lives in institution
  • to control group of romanian children who had never been institutionalised
  • assessed using strange situation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

zeanah et al - AO1
findings

A
  • 44% of institutionalised children showed signs of disinhibited attachment
  • compared to less than 20% of control group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

zeanah et al - AO1
conclusion

A

institutionalisation can have negative effects on psychological development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Strength - AO3
practical applications

A

P - strength
- practical applications
- led to improved conditions surrounding institutions/upbringing of children outside family home

E - e.g. instead of multiple caregivers, children given 1/2 key workers who play central role in childs emotional care

E - institutionalisation = undesireable
- more effort made to foster/adopt
- reduces negative consequences e.g. disinhibited attachments
- children more likely to form bonds with carers if time spent with them

L - important part of applied psych
- improved understanding of effects of institutionalisation
- prevents worst effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

strength - AO3
high control over extraneous variables

A

P - strength
- high control over extraneous variables

E - previous orphan studies = children previously had trauma/neglected
- difficult to tell if long lasting effects were due to institutionalisation

E - rutters research = previously had loving parents who could not afford to keep them
- so not a confounding variable

L - increases internal validity of rutters research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

high control over extraneous variables - AO3

COUNTER ARGUEMENT

A

P - may have introduced other confounding variables

E - romanian orphanages = poor quality of care

E - no intellectual comfort/stimulation

L - may be due to poor institutionalised care not representative of institutions as a whole

17
Q

weakness - AO3
no random allocation

A

P - weakness
- naturally occurring IV of age of adoption
- before 6 months, between 6 months - 2 years, after 2 years

E - would have been unethical to randomly assign to conditions

E - earlier adopted children before 6 months may have been more sociable
- hence why chosent by adoptive parents
- less development issues

L - weakens internal validity
- acts as a confounding variable