Sex Ratios and Evolution Flashcards
Fishers principle
an evolutionary model that explains why the sex ratio of most species that produce offspring through sexual reproduction is approximately 1:1 between males and female
‘more females should be produced as one male can foster multiple offspring’ BUT:
a. if male birhts < female births then a new born male has better mating prospects and produces more ofspring
b. so mothers produce more males as ‘male producing gene’ increases
c. thus more males than females exist= need for females to meet demand
= results in an equillibrium (and challenges group selection! as individual selection)
“Selfish” gene theory:
A model of evolution, a gene’s eye view of natural selection.
Genes are replicators, individuals are their vehicles.
Replicators make copies of themselves. Successful replicators make more copies than unsuccessful replicators. Improved vehicles (bodies) promote their success.
Group selection:
(Wyrne-Edwards 1960s) A model of evolution. Some researchers believe that natural selection can favor traits benefiting groups to the disadvantage of individuals.
Selection at the group level is expected to be weaker than selection at the individual level because groups do not reproduce as quickly as individuals and because group altruism can not resist the introduction of “selfish individuals.”
trivers willards 1973 hypothesies
Female mammals are able to adjust offspring sex ratio in response to their maternal condition
–> sex is favoured that advantages females more
i.e. if youre powerful= you should give more birth to sons (So high ranking females produce more sons; low ranking females produce more daughters)
local resource competition (silk 1981) hypothesis
ffemales benefit from having a adaughter if rank is inhiereted in philopatric matrillines
so HRF= more daughters
LR= more sons
Local Resource Competition Intensity (Vanshai and Hrdy 1991)
dynamics between maternal rank and secondary sexy ratio vary in local conditions:
- HRF overproduce sons when populations grow and Local resource competition is relaxed
- HRF overproduce DAUGHTERS when population shrinks and local resource competition is intense (due to threat of sons)
violations of fishers 1:1 SSR principle (in humans)
us african americans produce more girls than boys
but on average; its 100 girls to 105 boys in human population
why are more boys born than girls
- boys more fragile and exposed to trauma/ilness/fightinng = more liklely to die
- repaire mechanisms cant be selected for as this would mean low reproductive success
sex ratios
primary= at conception secondary= at birth (SSR)
hypergyny
to marry ‘up
Trivers-Willards Hypothesis Evidence: Rajasthan
high social status= prefer sons
low status= prefer daughters
girls experience infanticide in HR
girl sin LR experience hypergyny (marry up)
Trivers-Willards Hypothesis Evidence: Germany
high status= prefer sons
low rank= prefer daughters
due to hypergyny
example of Silks LRC theory in primates
in macaques: mothers + grandmothers stick together when males leave (female philopatry and male dispersal): daughter stays to help mom= hence daughters help mothers if sons leave
facultative sex ratio adjustment: why is conception the best time to manipulate sex ratios?
post natallay- infanticide and differential investment
pre-natally= abortion
at conception= manipulation of sex ratio of fertilized ovum (more economical than other two)
“X vs Y Sperm” hypothesis
x sperm= slower but long life
y sperm= faster but short lie
hence females mate during ovulation if they want a son, and before ovulation if they want a daughter
SSR: mechanism
timing ofovulation
differential sperm speed
SSR function
a particular sex has better fitness returns
why are there more boys at the end of a war?
–> selection acts on INDIVIDUALS
sex= post war triggers sex at ovulation as more males have been lost (supports fishers principle)
Females= shoratege of men= advatnages to produce boys!
issues with group selection
‘free-rider problem’: genes that produce selfishness would outcompoete altruists
so ‘girl producing moms’ would be selected against
paradigm of group selection; alternative?
selection acts on INDIVIDUALS not groups
example of SSR + maternal rank…
cercopithecine monkeys; support trivers willard
i.e. barbaracy macaques:
if high female rank= 58% of ifnants are male
if low female rank= 43% of species are male