Research Methods AS L9 - 12 Flashcards
What do most research institutions have, who do they consist of and what do they do?
- Ethical committees
- Psychologists, staff, members of public, people from other disciplines & subject areas
- Approve all research by checking for ethical issues
- Cost-benefit analysis to determine if research should be carried out
Cost-benefit analysis:
Potential harm of doing research is weighed up against potential gains
What did BPS publish, how many ethical guidelines are there and what are the most important ones?
Code of ethics:
- Fully informed consent
- Deception
- Debriefing
- Right to withdraw
- Confidentiality
- Protection of pps from psychological harm
Definition of informed consent:
- Right of the pps to provide voluntary info
- Should be informed about what will be required of them, the purpose of research, their right to withdraw
What should informed consent do?
Inform pps of investigation objective
Which individuals cannot give consent themselves and who gives consent on behalf of them in these situations?
- Children below 16 –> parental consent
- People w/ mental disorders/severe learning difficulties & others –> fam/immediate kin
Why is informed consent sometimes not gained?
It causes pps to alter their behaviour
Types of informed consent:
1) Presumptive consent
2) Prior general consent
3) Retrospective consent
Presumptive consent:
People of similar background are asked if they would be willing to participate in the study despite the deception if it was them
Prior general consent (+evaluation):
- Pps agree to be deceived w/out knowing when or how this will occur
- However, knowing this could affect their behaviour
Retrospective consent (+evaluation):
- Asking consent after participating in study
- However, if they do not consent, data has to be destroyed
Protection from harm (physical + psychological):
- Risk should be no greater than that of ordinary life
- Study should be stopped if there is suspicion that a pp may be harmed
- Pp should leave research in same condition they entered
Right to withdraw:
All pps must be made aware that:
- They can leave study at any time, regardless of payments & incentives, w/our having to explain
- They can withdraw their data at any point in future
If a pp appears distressed, they should be reminded of their right to withdraw
Confidentiality:
Data can be traced back to a name but should not be shared with others
Anonymity:
Data cannot be traced back to a name as pps have not provided their name
Who can participants’ data be disclosed to and in what circumstances does this change?
- Confidential and cannot be disclosed to anyone
- Unless agreed in advance
If research is publicised, what should be used instead of what and why?
- Numbers and letters instead of names
- Help protect pp’s identity
What is unacceptable in a study?
Withholding of info or misleading pps (deception)
What are the rules around intentional deception?
- Avoided whenever possible
- Should not be done w/out scientific/medical justification
- Unavoidable if pps would change behaviour knowing true nature of research
What needs to be explained to pps after study if deception is used?
- Real purpose
- What happened in other conditions
- Why deception was necessary
- Reminded of right to withdraw, right to confidentiality and need to show respect to other pps
- Opportunity for pps to ask qs about research
How is new knowledge validated in psychology?
- Proposal of research study sent to number of experts
- Research councils and funding agencies only support well-designed research
- Research ethics committee will scrutinise it
What is the only way for other researchers to have access to research, how often is this done and what process is used to check the quality of work?
- Publishing in print
- Only published in scientific journals few times a yr
- Peer review
Process of peer review:
1) University sends completed research to another psychologist working in similar field
2) Considered for publishing in psychological journal if high enough quality (standards dependent on journal eg. Nature and Science is very prestigious so more challenging to meet)
3) Research panel considers peer reviewers’ views
4) Poor quality researcg returned to researcher for modification
What type of peer review usually occurs, what is this and what is the advantage of this?
- Double blind peer review
- Expert psychologist carrying out peer review is anonymous so neither them nor the one who wrote the research know who each other are
- Bias is limited
What is one disadvantage of academic journals and how is this problem overcome?
- Physical copies + online subscriptions are expensive (many unis only buy few physical copies a yr)
- General public/Less well-off unis may not have access
- Process called ‘Open access’
What is Open Access and how does it work?
Open Access = New knowledge can be viewed online by scientific community and general of public
1) Good quality work is published
2) Readers decide its validity, leave comments/ rate articles/ ranked by peer review