🧠 psychology - perry et al Flashcards

1
Q

What was the prediction in Perry et al?

A

Highly empathic individuals would prefer closer distances following OT administration, whilst less empathic individuals would show the opposite effect and prefer to maintain greater distances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the sample of Perry et al?

A

54 male participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Where were participants for Perry et al sampled from?

A

The University of Hafia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the age range of the participants of Perry et al?

A

19 to 32 years old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the mean age of participants of Perry et al?

A

25.29 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How many participants of Perry et al were left handed?

A

5 participants were left handed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What reward were participants of Perry et al given for participation?

A

Course credits or payment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the participants of Perrry et al’s backgrounds

A
  • No history of psychological illness
  • Normal vision
  • No neurological disorders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the two groups the participants of Perry et al were divided into?

A
  • High IRI score: IRI>=40
  • Low IRI Score: IRI<=33
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What institutes gave ethical approval for Perry et al?

A
  • The Hasassah Medical Center’s Ethics Committee
  • The Ethics Committee of the University of Hafia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How was OT administered?

A

Participants came twice, one week apart, on the same day and at the same time, signing an informed consent form and self administering a solution of 24 international units in 250ml of either OT or the placebo - with a medicine dropper, three in each nostril.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did the placebo consist of?

A

The salt solution the hormone was dissolved in but not the hormone itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How were the IRI scores found?

A

An online questionnaire of the IRI test - a 28 item self-report measure consisting of four 7 item subscales tapping a different aspect of the global concept of empathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How long did the participant have to wait after completing the IRI questionnaire?

Why?

A

45 minutes

To ensure OT levels in CNS reached a plateau

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How were participants occupied when waiting for the experiment to start?

A

They were given 3 issues of a popular Israeli nature magazine in order to keep social interaction to a minimum

16
Q

Was counterbalancing used in Perry et al?

A

👍👍

17
Q

In Experiment 1 (CID), describe the computerised animation of the CID test.

A
  1. Participant shown name of approaching figure for 1s
  2. Shown fixation point for 0.5s
  3. Shown still picture of circular room with a figure at the center and an approaching figure at one of eight entrances
  4. 3s animation showing the figure approaching the center of the circle

Animation stops either when figure collides or when participant presses spacebar

18
Q

How many trials were there for each figure in Experiment 1 (CID)?

A

24 trials

19
Q

How many trials overall were there in Experiment 1 (CID) per participant?

A

96 trials in total

20
Q

How were responses computed in experiment 1 (CID)?

A

Percentage of remaining distance from total distance - with 0 representing approaching figure reaching inner figure and 100 representing being stopped immediately

21
Q

What were the different names of figures in Experiment 1?

A

Close friend, stranger, authority figure (boss / teacher), ball

22
Q

How were participants decieved during experiment 2?

A

They were told that the rooms they were choosing would decide the room they sit with another participant in to discuss personal topics after 2 weeks of experiments

23
Q

What were the variables in experiment 2?

A
  • Angle of table / plant
  • Angle of chairs
  • Distance between table and plant
  • Distance between chairs
24
Q
A
25
Q

Mean distance for stranger cos friend (vs ball)

A

Stranger: 39.82%
Ball: 20.20%
Friend: 12.46%

26
Q

OT | Control group

High empathy

Low empathy

A

23.29% 26.11%
30.20% 25.98%