Psychology 111- Chapter 14 Flashcards

1
Q

Social Comparison Theory

A

a lot of how we interact socially is how we compare ourselves to others (usually similar others)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

upward comparison

A

comparing ourselves to someone doing better than us-> negative emotionality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

downward comparison

A

comparing ourselves to someone doing worse than us-> positive emotionality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

enlightenment effect

A

where we change our behavior after learning about a physiological concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

halo effect

A

when someone has one good quality, we assume they have many other good qualities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

A

because we think we will act a certain way, that is how we act
- usually in more negative ways (ex: if we think we can’t complete something, we create barriers for that)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

affective component

A

how does it make you feel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

behavioral component

A

not necessarily actual behavior, but how you want to respond (how you want to respond vs. how you actually respond)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

cognitive component

A

what you think about it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

strength

A

how strong is your attitude toward the item (weak attitudes are more flexible/changeable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

accessibility

A

how accessible/available the attitude is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ambivalence

A

two different attitudes toward an item (negative and positive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

source

A

the person trying to convince you/get you to change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

receiver

A

person being persuaded/looking to see attitude change in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

message

A

what is being said/done to create the attitude change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

channel

A

delivery component of message/how the message is getting to the receiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

cognitive dissonance

A

have 2 opinions in your head or have opinion and behavior that are at odds (makes us uncomfortable so we change something)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

self-perception theory

A

we don’t actually have a good grasp on what our attitudes are and build them by looking at our behaviors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

impression management theory

A

our behaviors, attitudes, and presentation are strategic, so others think of you in the way you want them to think of you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

central route

A
  • part of elaboration likelihood model
    = meaning behind your message, harder but creates more lasting change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

peripheral route

A
  • part of elaboration likelihood model
    = trying to cause attitude change by distracting you from the meaning of the message
  • easier, but more temporary change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Foot in the Door

A

starting small and getting bigger and bigger (starts with small request then builds on it until they get to the attitude they want to change)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Door in the face

A
  • starts big and goes smaller to the attitude they want to change
  • expect a no from first question, follow up with more reasonable question we are more likely to say yes to
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

attribution

A

how we explain an event or behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

stable explanation

A

explanation is not likely to change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

unstable explanation

A

explanation is likely to change/the circumstances leading to an event are likely to change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

internal attribution

A

an aspect of the person is causing the behavior/event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

external attribution

A

because of situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

individualism vs. collectivism

A

in more individualist cultures, more likely to make internal attributions; in collectivist more likely to make external attributions

30
Q

fundamental attribution error

A

generally, make internal attributions for others and external for ourselves

31
Q

defense attribution error (self-serving bias)

A

we make internal attributions for our successes and external for our failures

32
Q

stereotypes

A
  • people schemas
  • neither good/bad, shortcut for the brain to process info faster
  • stereotypes for groups you are a part of tend to be more positive, and other groups tend to be more negative
33
Q

subtyping

A

creating smaller, more specific stereotypes so you don’t have to abandon the larger stereotype

34
Q

perceptual confirmation

A

process ambiguous info so it fits with your stereotype (you want to see what you are expecting to see)

35
Q

illusory correlation

A

you believe you have encountered more situations that support your stereotype than you actually have

36
Q

adaptive conservatism

A

it is better to be safe than sorry (better to distrust the outgroup until you know more about the situation), want to protect ourselves and your ingroup

37
Q

outgroup homogeneity

A

you think out group is more similar than they actually are

38
Q

contact hypothesis

A

the more you interact with outgroup members, the less likely you are to prejudice/discriminate against them

39
Q

superordinate goals

A

a way to reduce prejudice/discrimination, working together to take down common enemy, shared goals among different outgroups

40
Q

common knowledge effect

A

when info shared by everyone is group is more powerful than info that an individual brings in decision making

41
Q

social loafing

A

the presence of others makes an individual withdraw some of their effort

42
Q

group polarization

A

individuals in a group shift toward extreme opinions

43
Q

groupthink

A

when individuals sacrifice their own thinking/opinion to fit with the group

44
Q

deindividuation

A

when social norms of the group outweigh a person’s individuality

45
Q

conformity

A

yielding to social/group pressure (don’t want to stand out)

46
Q

compliance

A

yielding to specific requests/demands

47
Q

obedience

A

pressure comes from a perceived authority figure (form of compliance)

48
Q

informational influence

A

conforming to others behavior because you see them as a source of info

49
Q

normative influence

A

going along with a behavior because you want to be accepted by a group

50
Q

unanimity

A

the extent to which other group members agree with each other, more unanimity leads to more conformity

51
Q

co-conspirator

A

people who don’t give into the conformity (you are more likely not to conform if someone else shared your opinions)

52
Q

group size

A

more people in a group=more conformity

53
Q

anonymity

A

being anonymous= less likely to conform

54
Q

closeness

A

the closer to you the authority figure is, the more likely you are to be obedient

55
Q

legitimate authority

A

how legit a person views the authority figure is

56
Q

prestige

A

if authority figure/institution is perceived as prestigious, the more likely to obey what they are saying

57
Q

depersonalized victim

A

person has weaker sense of self, so they are more likely to be obedient

58
Q

defiant models

A

someone in the group that does not obey the authority (if someone else does this, then other people are more likely to break from that obedience as well)

59
Q

Sternberg’s triangle theory of love

A

-intimacy= feelings of a bond
-passion= physical attraction
-commitment= conscious decision to be in a relationship with someone

60
Q

matching hypothesis

A

we are more likely to be attracted to people who have similar level of social desirability

61
Q

facial symmetry

A

we consider people to be more attractive if they have this

62
Q

attitude alignment

A

when we are in a relationship, and you change your attitudes to align yourself with that person (smaller, less significant attitudes)

63
Q

proximity

A

more likely to be in a relationship with someone who is physically close to you (distance)

64
Q

relational aggression

A

intentionally harming someone’s reputation, relationships, or social status (more likely among women)

65
Q

hostile aggression

A

driven by anger in response to threat/insult with goal to inflict pain due to that

66
Q

instrumental aggression

A

aggression without goal of inflicting pain but pain is often inflicted (es: hockey)

67
Q

altruism

A

unselfish behavior to benefit others without benefits to yourself

68
Q

reciprocal altruism

A

we are altruistic to others in the hope that good things/people will act altruistic back to us

69
Q

kin selection

A

variance of natural selection, favors behavior that increases chance of survival for kin

70
Q

empathy-altruism hypothesis

A

hypothesis of why we act altruistic toward others-> we have empathy toward them (we feel empathy for others in distress, so we act altruistically to make ourselves feel better)

71
Q

bystander effect

A

the more people that witness an emergency, the less likely someone is to say something about it

72
Q

social responsibility norm

A

we are likely to help other people