Psychology 111- Chapter 14 Flashcards

1
Q

Social Comparison Theory

A

a lot of how we interact socially is how we compare ourselves to others (usually similar others)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

upward comparison

A

comparing ourselves to someone doing better than us-> negative emotionality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

downward comparison

A

comparing ourselves to someone doing worse than us-> positive emotionality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

enlightenment effect

A

where we change our behavior after learning about a physiological concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

halo effect

A

when someone has one good quality, we assume they have many other good qualities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

A

because we think we will act a certain way, that is how we act
- usually in more negative ways (ex: if we think we can’t complete something, we create barriers for that)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

affective component

A

how does it make you feel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

behavioral component

A

not necessarily actual behavior, but how you want to respond (how you want to respond vs. how you actually respond)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

cognitive component

A

what you think about it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

strength

A

how strong is your attitude toward the item (weak attitudes are more flexible/changeable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

accessibility

A

how accessible/available the attitude is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ambivalence

A

two different attitudes toward an item (negative and positive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

source

A

the person trying to convince you/get you to change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

receiver

A

person being persuaded/looking to see attitude change in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

message

A

what is being said/done to create the attitude change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

channel

A

delivery component of message/how the message is getting to the receiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

cognitive dissonance

A

have 2 opinions in your head or have opinion and behavior that are at odds (makes us uncomfortable so we change something)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

self-perception theory

A

we don’t actually have a good grasp on what our attitudes are and build them by looking at our behaviors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

impression management theory

A

our behaviors, attitudes, and presentation are strategic, so others think of you in the way you want them to think of you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

central route

A
  • part of elaboration likelihood model
    = meaning behind your message, harder but creates more lasting change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

peripheral route

A
  • part of elaboration likelihood model
    = trying to cause attitude change by distracting you from the meaning of the message
  • easier, but more temporary change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Foot in the Door

A

starting small and getting bigger and bigger (starts with small request then builds on it until they get to the attitude they want to change)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Door in the face

A
  • starts big and goes smaller to the attitude they want to change
  • expect a no from first question, follow up with more reasonable question we are more likely to say yes to
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

attribution

A

how we explain an event or behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
stable explanation
explanation is not likely to change
26
unstable explanation
explanation is likely to change/the circumstances leading to an event are likely to change
27
internal attribution
an aspect of the person is causing the behavior/event
28
external attribution
because of situation
29
individualism vs. collectivism
in more individualist cultures, more likely to make internal attributions; in collectivist more likely to make external attributions
30
fundamental attribution error
generally, make internal attributions for others and external for ourselves
31
defense attribution error (self-serving bias)
we make internal attributions for our successes and external for our failures
32
stereotypes
- people schemas - neither good/bad, shortcut for the brain to process info faster - stereotypes for groups you are a part of tend to be more positive, and other groups tend to be more negative
33
subtyping
creating smaller, more specific stereotypes so you don't have to abandon the larger stereotype
34
perceptual confirmation
process ambiguous info so it fits with your stereotype (you want to see what you are expecting to see)
35
illusory correlation
you believe you have encountered more situations that support your stereotype than you actually have
36
adaptive conservatism
it is better to be safe than sorry (better to distrust the outgroup until you know more about the situation), want to protect ourselves and your ingroup
37
outgroup homogeneity
you think out group is more similar than they actually are
38
contact hypothesis
the more you interact with outgroup members, the less likely you are to prejudice/discriminate against them
39
superordinate goals
a way to reduce prejudice/discrimination, working together to take down common enemy, shared goals among different outgroups
40
common knowledge effect
when info shared by everyone is group is more powerful than info that an individual brings in decision making
41
social loafing
the presence of others makes an individual withdraw some of their effort
42
group polarization
individuals in a group shift toward extreme opinions
43
groupthink
when individuals sacrifice their own thinking/opinion to fit with the group
44
deindividuation
when social norms of the group outweigh a person's individuality
45
conformity
yielding to social/group pressure (don't want to stand out)
46
compliance
yielding to specific requests/demands
47
obedience
pressure comes from a perceived authority figure (form of compliance)
48
informational influence
conforming to others behavior because you see them as a source of info
49
normative influence
going along with a behavior because you want to be accepted by a group
50
unanimity
the extent to which other group members agree with each other, more unanimity leads to more conformity
51
co-conspirator
people who don't give into the conformity (you are more likely not to conform if someone else shared your opinions)
52
group size
more people in a group=more conformity
53
anonymity
being anonymous= less likely to conform
54
closeness
the closer to you the authority figure is, the more likely you are to be obedient
55
legitimate authority
how legit a person views the authority figure is
56
prestige
if authority figure/institution is perceived as prestigious, the more likely to obey what they are saying
57
depersonalized victim
person has weaker sense of self, so they are more likely to be obedient
58
defiant models
someone in the group that does not obey the authority (if someone else does this, then other people are more likely to break from that obedience as well)
59
Sternberg's triangle theory of love
-intimacy= feelings of a bond -passion= physical attraction -commitment= conscious decision to be in a relationship with someone
60
matching hypothesis
we are more likely to be attracted to people who have similar level of social desirability
61
facial symmetry
we consider people to be more attractive if they have this
62
attitude alignment
when we are in a relationship, and you change your attitudes to align yourself with that person (smaller, less significant attitudes)
63
proximity
more likely to be in a relationship with someone who is physically close to you (distance)
64
relational aggression
intentionally harming someone's reputation, relationships, or social status (more likely among women)
65
hostile aggression
driven by anger in response to threat/insult with goal to inflict pain due to that
66
instrumental aggression
aggression without goal of inflicting pain but pain is often inflicted (es: hockey)
67
altruism
unselfish behavior to benefit others without benefits to yourself
68
reciprocal altruism
we are altruistic to others in the hope that good things/people will act altruistic back to us
69
kin selection
variance of natural selection, favors behavior that increases chance of survival for kin
70
empathy-altruism hypothesis
hypothesis of why we act altruistic toward others-> we have empathy toward them (we feel empathy for others in distress, so we act altruistically to make ourselves feel better)
71
bystander effect
the more people that witness an emergency, the less likely someone is to say something about it
72
social responsibility norm
we are likely to help other people